Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T07:24:39.592Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘The Stubborn Light of Things’. Landscape, Relational Agency, and Linear Earthworks in Later Prehistoric Britain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Adrian M. Chadwick
Adrian M. Chadwick*
Affiliation:
School of Archaeology and Ancient History, University of Leicester, UK
*
[Email: [email protected]]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Several regions in Britain saw the construction of large, linear earthworks of banks and ditches during the later Bronze Age and in the Iron Age, often extending for many kilometres. In the light of recent theoretical discussions of materiality and relational agency within archaeology and other social sciences, and through an avowedly discursive poetics of place, examples of these earthworks are re-assessed as actants, capable of affecting and directing the lives of people, animals, and plants. These linear earthworks were not static monuments, but were active assemblages or meshworks of materiality, movement, and memory.

De grands ouvrages de terre linéaires furent construits dans plusieurs régions de Grande-Bretagne vers la fin de l’âge du Bronze et pendant l’âge du Fer; il ‘s'agit de talus et de fossés atteignant souvent une longueur de plusieurs kilomètres. En prenant les débats théoriques récents sur la matérialité et l'agentivité relationnelle en archéologie et dans les sciences sociales comme point de départ, et en suivant une approche délibérément axée sur la poésie des lieux, cet article réexamine ces levées de terre en tant qu'acteurs capables d'influencer et d'orienter la vie des gens, des animaux et des plantes. Les ouvrages de terre n’étaient pas des monuments statiques; au contraire ils avaient le potentiel d'agir comme un ensemble actif, ou trame de matérialité, de mouvement et de mémoire. Translation by Madeleine Hummler.

Große, geradlinige Erdwerke, d.h. Wälle und Gräben die sich auf mehreren Kilometern erstreckten, wurden in der späten Bronzezeit und Eisenzeit in mehreren Gegenden von Großbritannien gebaut. In Zusammenhang mit der Anwendung von neueren Theorien über Materialität und relationale Handlungsfähigkeit in der Archäologie und den Sozialwissenschaften, und durch eine absichtlich diskursive Einstellung gegenüber die Poetik von Landschaften, werden hier Erdwerke als aktive Teilnehmer, die das Leben von Menschen, Tieren und Pflanzen beeinflussen können, neu betrachtet. Die Erdwerke waren nicht passive Denkmäler, sondern aktive Komplexe oder Netzwerke, in welchen Materialität, Bewegung und Erinnerung tätig waren. Translation by Madeleine Hummler.

Keywords

landscapeagencylinear earthworksmeshworksassemblagespaysageagentivitéouvrages de terre linéairestrameensembles archéologiquesLandschaftHandlungsfähigkeitlineare ErdwerkeNetzwerkeBefunde
Type
Articles
Information
European Journal of Archaeology , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , 2016 , pp. 245 - 278
Copyright
Copyright © European Association of Archaeologists 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Addy, S.O. 1893. The Hall of Waltheof: Or the Early Condition and Settlement of Hallamshire. London: David Nutt.Google Scholar
Alberti, B. & Bray, T. 2009. Animating Archaeology: Of Subjects, Objects and Alternative Ontologies. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 19 (3):337–43.Google Scholar
Alcock, L. 1954. Aberford Dykes: The First Defence of the Brigantes? Antiquity, 28:147–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldred, A. 2014. Past Movements, Tomorrow's Anchors. On the Relational Entanglements between Archaeological Mobilities. In: Leary, J., ed. Past Mobilities: Archaeological Approaches to Movement and Mobility. Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 21–47.Google Scholar
Aldred, A. & Sekedat, B. 2010–11. Moving on to Mobility: Archaeological Ambulations on the Mobile World. Archaeolog. <http://traumwerk.stanford.edu/archaeolog/2010/12/moving_on_to_mobility_archaeol.html#more> [accessed October 2013].Google Scholar
Argent, G. 2010. Do the Clothes Make the Horse? Relationality, Roles and Statuses in Iron Age Inner Asia. World Archaeology, 42 (2):157–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashbee, P. 1957. Excavation on the Roman Rigg near Wentworth. Transactions of the Hunter Archaeological Society, 7:256–65.Google Scholar
Atkinson, S. 1994. Archaeological Survey and Excavation in Advance of the Construction of the Rotherham to Stocksbridge Gas Pipeline. In: Whiteley, S.P. & Cumberpatch, C.G., eds. Archaeology in South Yorkshire 1993–1994. Sheffield: SYAS, pp. 45–50.Google Scholar
Atkinson, S., Latham, I.D. & Sydes, R.E. 1992. Investigations at Caesar's Camp, Scholes Coppice. In: Francis, M.J., Cumberpatch, C.G. & Whiteley, S.P., eds. Archaeology in South Yorkshire 1991–1992. Sheffield: SYAS, pp. 31–40.Google Scholar
Barad, K. 2003. Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of how Matter Comes to Matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28 (3):801–31.Google Scholar
Barrett, J.C. 2000. A Thesis on Agency. In: Dobres, M.-A. & Robb, J., eds. Agency in Archaeology. London: Routledge, pp. 61–68.Google Scholar
Barrett, J.C. 2001. Agency, the Duality of Structure, and the Problem of the Archaeological Record. In: Hodder, I., ed. Archaeological Theory Today. Cambridge: Polity, pp. 141–64.Google Scholar
Barrett, J.C., Bradley, R. & Green, M. 1991. Landscape, Monuments and Society. The Prehistory of Cranborne Chase. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bartlett, J.E. & Mackey, R.W. 1972. Walkington Wold Excavations. East Riding Archaeologist, 1 (2):1–100.Google Scholar
Basso, K. 1996. Wisdom Sits in Places: Landscape and Language Among the Western Apache. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Bender, B., Hamilton, S. & Tilley, C. 2007. Stone Worlds: Narrative and Reflexivity in Landscape Archaeology. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, J. 2010. Vibrant Matter: a Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Bevan, B. 1997. Bounding the Landscape: Place and Identity during the Yorkshire Wolds Iron Age. In: Gwilt, A. & Haselgrove, C., eds. Reconstructing Iron Age Societies. Oxford: Oxbow, pp. 181–91.Google Scholar
Boldrini, N. 1999a. Creating Space: A Re-examination of the Roman Ridge. Transactions of the Hunter Archaeological Society, 20:24–30.Google Scholar
Boldrini, N. 1999b. When is a Border not a Border? The Roman Ridge Re-evaluated. In: Cumberpatch, C.G., McNeil, J. & Whiteley, S., eds. Archaeology in South Yorkshire 1996–1998. Sheffield: SYAS, pp. 101–04.Google Scholar
Boucher, A. & Webb, A. 1994. M1-A1 Link Road, Site 21, Aberford. Geophysical and Topographic Survey. Unpublished report, Leeds: Archaeological Services WYAS.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1992. The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bowen, H.C. 1978. ‘Celtic’ Fields and ‘Ranch’ Boundaries in Wessex. In Limbrey, S. & Evans, J.G., eds. The Effect of Man on the Landscape: the Lowland Zone. CBA Research Report 21. London: Council for British Archaeology, pp. 115–23.Google Scholar
Bowen, H.C. 1990. The Archaeology of Bokerley Dyke. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Brackenbury, A. 1995. 1829. Manchester: Carcanet.Google Scholar
Bradley, R. 1987. Time Regained – The Creation of Continuity. Journal of the British Archaeological Association, 140:1–17.Google Scholar
Bradley, R. 2000. An Archaeology of Natural Places. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bradley, R., Entwistle, R. & Raymond, F. 1994. Prehistoric Land Divisions on Salisbury Plain. The Work of the Wessex Linear Ditches Project. London: English Heritage.Google Scholar
Bristow, T. 2015. The Anthropocene Lyric: An Affective Geography of Poetry, Person, Place. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broderick, L. 2012. Ritualisation (or the Four Fully Articulated Ungulates of the Apocalypse). In: Pluskowski, A., ed. The Ritual Killing and Burial of Animals: European Perspectives. Oxford: Oxbow, pp. 22–32.Google Scholar
Brooks, R.T. 1967. Becca Banks – near Aberford, Yorkshire, West Riding. Yorkshire Archaeological Journal, 42:12–14.Google Scholar
Brown, K. 1995. Hollins Moor, Colton. Archaeological Evaluation. Unpublished report, Leeds: Archaeological Services WYAS.Google Scholar
Brück, J. 2001. Monuments, Power and Personhood in the British Neolithic. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, N.S. 7:649–67.Google Scholar
Brück, J. 2004. Material Metaphors: The Relational Construction of Identity in Early Bronze Age Burials in Ireland and Britain. Journal of Social Archaeology, 4 (3):307–33.Google Scholar
Buller, H. 2014. Animal Geographies I. Progress in Human Geography, 38 (2):308–18.Google Scholar
Bunting, M. 2009. The Plot: A Biography of an English Acre. London: Granta.Google Scholar
Burström, M. 2012. If We Are Quiet, Will Things Cry Out? Current Swedish Archaeology, 20:41–45.Google Scholar
Busby, C. 1997. Permeable and Partible Persons: A Comparative Analysis of Gender and the Body in South India and Melanesia. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 3 (2):261–78.Google Scholar
Campbell, B. 2005. On ‘Loving your Water Buffalo more than your own Mother’: Relationships of Animal and Human Care in Nepal. In: Knight, J., ed. Animals in Person: Cultural Perspectives on Human–Animal Intimacies. Oxford: Berg, pp. 79–100.Google Scholar
Carter, S., Bunting, J. & Tipping, R. 2001. Grim's Ditch North. The Analysis of the Buried Soil and Ditch Sediments. In: Roberts, I., Burgess, A. & Berg, D., eds. A New Link to the Past. The Archaeological Landscape of the M1-A1 Link Road. Yorkshire Archaeology 7. Leeds: West Yorkshire Archaeology Service, pp. 230–33.Google Scholar
Casella, E. & Croucher, K. 2011. Beyond Human: The Materiality of Personhood. Feminist Theory, 12 (2):209–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chadwick, A.M. 2004. ‘Geographies of Sentience’ – An Introduction to Space, Place and Time. In: Chadwick, A.M., ed. Stories from the Landscape: Archaeologies of Inhabitation. British Archaeological Reports International Series S1238. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 1–31.Google Scholar
Chadwick, A.M. 2007. Trackways, Hooves and Memory-Days – Human and Animal Memories and Movements around Iron Age and Romano-British Rural Landscapes. In: Cummings, V. & Johnston, R., eds. Prehistoric Journeys. Oxford: Oxbow, pp. 131–52.Google Scholar
Chadwick, A.M. 2010. The Gray Hill Landscape Research Project, Llanfair Discoed, Monmouthshire, Wales. In: Lewis, H. & Semple, S., eds. Perspectives in Landscape Archaeology: Papers Presented at Oxford 2003–5. British Archaeological Reports International Series S2103. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 94–106.Google Scholar
Chadwick, A.M. 2012. Routine Magic, Mundane Ritual – Towards a Unified Notion of Depositional Practice. Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 31 (3):283–315.Google Scholar
Chadwick, A.M. forthcoming. Foot-fall and Hoof-hit. Agencies, Movements, and Materialities; and Later Prehistoric and Romano-British Trackways. Cambridge Archaeological Journal.Google Scholar
Chadwick, A.M. & Gibson, C.D. 2013. ‘Do you Remember the First Time?’ A Preamble through Memory, Myth and Place. In: Chadwick, A.M. & Gibson, C.D., eds. Memory, Myth and Long-term Landscape Inhabitation. Oxford: Oxbow, pp. 1–30.Google Scholar
Chadwick, A.M., Martin, L. & Richardson, J. 2013. The Significance of Goats and Chickens? Iron Age and Roman Faunal Assemblages, Deposition and Memory Work at Wattle Syke, West Yorkshire. In: Chadwick, A.M. & Gibson, C.D., eds. Memory, Myth and Long-term Landscape Inhabitation. Oxford: Oxbow, pp. 165–88.Google Scholar
Chakrabarty, D. 2000. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, A. 2008. Where Brain, Body and World Collide. In: Knappett, C. & Malafouris, L., eds. Material Agency: Towards a Non-anthropocentric Approach. New York: Springer, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
Codrington, T. 1918. Roman Roads in Britain, 3rd ed. London: Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge.Google Scholar
Connerton, P. 1989. How Societies Remember. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cook, A.M. & Dacre, M.W. 1985. Excavations at Portway, Andover 1973–1975. Anglo-Saxon Cemetery, Bronze Age Barrow and Linear Ditch. Oxford University Committee for Archaeology Monograph 4. Oxford: Institute of Archaeology.Google Scholar
Cooper, A. & Edmonds, M. 2007. Past and Present. Excavations at Broom, Bedfordshire 1996–2005. Cambridge: Cambridge Archaeological Unit.Google Scholar
Coutts, C. 1999. An Archaeological and Archival Study of Ancient Woodland in Sheffield. In: Cumberpatch, C., McNeil, J. & Whiteley, S., eds. Archaeology in South Yorkshire 1996–1998. Sheffield: South Yorkshire Archaeology Service, pp. 72–79.Google Scholar
Crawford, O.G.S. 1935. Arthur and his Battles. Antiquity, 9:277–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cresswell, T. & Merriman, P. eds. 2011. Geographies of Mobilities: Practices, Spaces, Subjects. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Cronk, K.A. 2004. South-West Yorkshire's Roman Ridge. A ‘Who-Dug-It?’ Mystery. Rotherham: Clifton and Wellgate Local History Group.Google Scholar
Crummy, P. 2011. In the Days Before Banks. The Colchester Archaeologist, 24:1–2.Google Scholar
Cumberpatch, C. & Roberts, H. 2011. Life in the Archaeological Marketplace. In: Rockman, M. & Flatman, J., eds. Archaeology in Society: Its Relevance in the Modern World. New York: Springer, pp. 23–44.Google Scholar
Cunliffe, B. 1990. Before Hillforts. Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 9:323–36.Google Scholar
Cunliffe, B. 2003. Danebury Hillfort. Stroud: Tempus.Google Scholar
Cunliffe, B. 2004. Wessex Cowboys? Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 23 (1):61–81.Google Scholar
Daniel, P. & Noon, S. 2007. Asselby to Pannal Natural Gas Pipeline. The Aberford Dykes Complex: The South Dyke (Scheduled Monument No. 31520). Preliminary Excavation Report. Unpublished report, Lincoln: Network Archaeology Ltd.Google Scholar
De Jaegher, H. & Froese, T. 2009. On the Role of Social Interaction in Individual Human Agency. Adaptive Behavior, 17:444–60.Google Scholar
Deegan, A. 2001. Aerial Photographs. In: Roberts, I., Burgess, A. & Berg, D., eds. A New Link to the Past. The Archaeological Landscape of the M1-A1 Link Road. Yorkshire Archaeology 7. Leeds: West Yorkshire Archaeology Service, pp. 13–35.Google Scholar
Deegan, A. & Foard, G. 2007. Mapping Ancient Landscapes in Northamptonshire. Swindon: English Heritage.Google Scholar
DeLanda, M. 2006. A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia (trans. Massumi, B. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Dobres, M.-A. & Robb, J. 2000. Agency in Archaeology. Paradigm or Platitude? In: Dobres, M.-A. & Robb, J., eds. Agency in Archaeology. London: Routledge, pp. 3–17.Google Scholar
Dwyer, P.D. & Minnegal, M. 2005. Person, Place or Pig: Animal Attachments and Human Transactions in New Guinea. In: Knight, J., ed. Animals in Person: Cultural Perspectives on Human–Animal Intimacies. Oxford: Berg, pp. 37–60.Google Scholar
Edmonds, M. 2004. The Langdales: Landscape and Prehistory in a Lakeland Valley. Stroud: Tempus.Google Scholar
Evans, J.G. 2003. Environmental Archaeology and the Social Order. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Faull, M.L. 1981. The Roman Period. In: Faull, M.L. & Moorhouse, S.A., eds. West Yorkshire: An Archaeological Survey to AD 1500. Leeds: University of Leeds, pp. 141–70.Google Scholar
Faye, B. 1996. Relations homme-animal dans les élevages laitiers intensifs de Bretagne (France). Anthropozoologica, 22:17–22.Google Scholar
Fenton-Thomas, C. 2003. Late Prehistoric and Early Historic Landscapes on the Yorkshire Chalk. British Archaeological Reports British Series 350. Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Fenton-Thomas, C. 2005. Forgotten Landscapes of the Yorkshire Wolds. Stroud: Tempus.Google Scholar
Fenton-Thomas, C. 2006. Consultants in Archaeology: Some Observations from the Field. Rescue News, 99:7.Google Scholar
Fenton-Thomas, C. 2008. Mobile and Enclosed Landscapes on the Yorkshire Worlds. In: Chadwick, A.M., ed. Recent Approaches to the Archaeology of Land Allotment. British Archaeological Reports International Series S1875. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 266–87.Google Scholar
Fenton-Thomas, C. 2011. Where Sky and Yorkshire and Water Meet: the Story of the Melton Landscape from Prehistory to the Present. On-Site Archaeology Monographs 2. York: On-Site Archaeology.Google Scholar
Fenton-Thomas, C. 2013. Granny's Old Sheep Bones and Other Stories from the Melton Landscape. In: Chadwick, A.M. & Gibson, C.D., eds. Memory, Myth and Long-term Landscape Inhabitation. Oxford: Oxbow, pp. 315–33.Google Scholar
Fijn, N. 2011. Living with Herds: Human–Animal Coexistence in Mongolia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fioccoprile, E. 2014. A Tale of two Earthworks: Exploring Variation in the Linear Earthwork Landscapes of Huggate Dykes and Wetwang-Garton Slack. Paper presented at the 17th Iron Age Research Student Symposium (IARSS), University of Edinburgh, May 2014.Google Scholar
Fowler, C. 2004. The Archaeology of Personhood. An Anthropological Approach. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fowler, C. 2013. The Emergent Past: A Relational Realist Archaeology of Early Bronze Age Mortuary Practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Garrow, D. 2012. Odd Deposits and Average Practice. A Critical History of the Concept of Structured Deposition. Archaeological Dialogues, 19 (2):85–115.Google Scholar
Gibson, C.D. 2013. Out of Time but not out of Place. Tempo, Rhythm and Dynamics of Inhabitation in Southern England. In: Chadwick, A.M. & Gibson, C.D., eds. Memory, Myth and Long-term Landscape Inhabitation. Oxford: Oxbow, pp. 99–123.Google Scholar
Gibson, E. 2015. Movement, Power and Place: The Biography of a Wagon Road in a Contested First Nations Landscape. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 25 (2):417–34.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Giles, M. 2007a. Refiguring Rights in the Early Iron Age Landscapes of East Yorkshire. In: Haselgrove, C. & Pope, R., eds. The Earlier Iron Age in Britain and the Near Continent. Oxford: Oxbow, pp. 103–19.Google Scholar
Giles, M. 2007b. Good Fences Make Good Neighbours? Exploring the Ladder Enclosures of Late Iron Age East Yorkshire. In: Haselgrove, C. & Moore, T., eds. The Later Iron Age in Britain and Beyond. Oxford: Oxbow, pp. 235–50.Google Scholar
Giles, M. 2012. A Forged Glamour: Landscape, Identity and Material Culture in the Iron Age. Oxford: Windgather Press.Google Scholar
Gillings, M. 2012. Landscape Phenomenology, GIS and the Role of Affordance. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 19:601–11.Google Scholar
Gingell, R. 1992. The Marlborough Downs: A Later Bronze Age Landscape and its Origins. Wiltshire Archaeology and Natural History Society Monograph 1. Salisbury: Wessex Archaeology.Google Scholar
Gooch, P. 2008. Feet Following Hooves. In: Ingold, T. & Vergunst, J.L., eds. Ways of Walking: Ethnography and Practice on Foot. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 67–80.Google Scholar
Gosden, C. 2005. What do Objects Want? Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 12 (3):193–211.Google Scholar
Grantham, C. & Grantham, E. 1965. An Earthwork and Anglian Cemetery at Garton-on-the-Wolds, East Yorkshire. Yorkshire Archaeological Journal, 41:355–60.Google Scholar
Gray, J. 1999. Open Spaces and Dwelling Places: Being at Home on Hill Farms in the Scottish Borders. American Ethnologist, 26 (2):440–60.Google Scholar
Greene, D. 1950. ‘The Roman Ridge,’ Hill Top, Kimberworth, near Rotherham. Transactions of the Hunter Archaeological Society, 6:95–98.Google Scholar
Greene, D. & Preston, F.L. 1957. Two Excavations in the ‘Roman Ridge’ Dyke. Transactions of the Hunter Archaeological Society, 7:20–25.Google Scholar
Gregory, R.A. & Daniel, P. 2013a. Landscape 2 East: Sherburn in Elmet to the Cock Beck. In: Gregory, R.A., Daniel, P. & Brown, F., eds. Early Landscapes of West and North Yorkshire: Archaeological Investigations along the Asselby to Pannal Natural Gas Pipeline 2007–8. Lancaster: Oxford Archaeology North, pp. 67–153.Google Scholar
Gregory, R.A. & Daniel, P. 2013b. Discussion. In: Gregory, R.A., Daniel, P. & Brown, F., eds. Early Landscapes of West and North Yorkshire: Archaeological Investigations along the Asselby to Pannal Natural Gas Pipeline 2007–8. Lancaster: Oxford Archaeology North, pp. 233–72.Google Scholar
Hacıgüzeller, P. 2012. GIS, Critique, Representation, and Beyond. Journal of Social Archaeology, 12 (2):245–63.Google Scholar
Halliday, S. 2014. Lost in Plain Sight. Paper presented at the IFA Conference and Training Event: Research in Practice, Glasgow, April 2014.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. 2008. When Species Meet. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Harris, G.G. 1989. Concepts of Individual, Self, and Person in Description and Analysis. American Anthropologist, 91:599–612.Google Scholar
Harris, O.J.T. 2013. Relational Communities in Prehistoric Britain. In: Watts, C., ed. Relational Archaeologies: Humans, Animals, Things. London: Routledge, pp. 173–89.Google Scholar
Harris, O.J.T. & Robb, J. 2012. Multiple Ontologies and the Problem of the Body in History. American Anthropologist, 114 (4):668–79.Google Scholar
Helms, M. 1988. Ulysses’ Sail. An Ethnographic Odyssey of Power, Knowledge and Geographic Distance. Princeton, NJ: New Jersey Press.Google Scholar
Henare, A., Holbraad, M. & Wastell, S. eds. 2007. Thinking through Things. Theorising Artefacts Ethnographically. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hirsch, E. 2006. Landscape, Myth and Time. Journal of Material Culture, 11:151–65.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1982. Symbols in Action: Ethnoarchaeological Studies of Material Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 2000. Agency and Individuals in Long-term Processes. In: Dobres, M.-A. & Robb, J., eds. Agency in Archaeology. London: Routledge, pp. 21–33.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 2012. Entangled: An Archaeology of the Relationships between Humans and Things. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 2014. The Entanglements of Humans and Things: A Long-term View. New Literary History, 45:19–36.Google Scholar
Hofmann, D. 2013. Intimate Connection: Bodies and Substances in Flux in the Early Neolithic of Central Europe. In: Watts, C., ed. Relational Archaeologies: Humans, Animals, Things. London: Routledge, pp. 154–72.Google Scholar
Hood, A. 2013. King's Park, King Harry Lane, St Albans, Hertfordshire. Archaeological Monitoring and Excavation Phase 2: Post-Excavation Assessment. Unpublished report, Swindon: Foundations Archaeology.Google Scholar
Hoskins, J. 1998. Biographical Objects. How Things Tell the Stories of People's Lives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hunter, J. 1819. Hallamshire. London: Lackington, Hughes, Harding, Mavor & Jones.Google Scholar
Hurst, J. 1976. Wharram Percy: A Case Study in Microtopography. In: Sawyer, P., ed. Medieval Settlement: Continuity and Change. London: Arnold, pp. 114–44.Google Scholar
Impey, A. 2013. Songs of Mobility and Belonging. Interventions: International Journal of Postcolonial Studies, 15 (2):255–71.Google Scholar
Ingold, T. 1993. The Temporality of the Landscape. World Archaeology, 25 (2):152–74.Google Scholar
Ingold, T. 2000. The Perception of the Environment. Essays in Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ingold, T. 2004. Culture on the Ground: The World Perceived through the Feet. Journal of Material Culture, 9 (3):315–40.Google Scholar
Ingold, T. 2007. Materials against Materiality. Archaeological Dialogues, 14 (1):1–16.Google Scholar
Ingold, T. 2008. When ANT Meets SPIDER: Social Theory for Arthropods. In: Knappett, C. & Malafouris, L., eds. Material Agency: Towards a Non-Anthropocentric Approach. New York: Springer, pp. 209–15.Google Scholar
Ingold, T. 2010. The Round Mound is not a Monument. In: Leary, J., Darvill, T. & Field, D., eds. Round Mounds and Monumentality in the British Neolithic and Beyond. Oxford: Oxbow, pp. 253–60.Google Scholar
Ingold, T. 2011. Being Alive: Essays on Movement, Knowledge and Description. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ingold, T. & Jones, A. 2002. From the Perception of Archaeology to the Anthropology of Perception. An Interview with Tim Ingold. Journal of Social Archaeology, 3 (1):5–22.Google Scholar
Jackson, M. & Karp, I. eds. 1990. Personhood and Agency: The Experience of Self and Other in African Cultures. Uppsala Studies in Anthropology 14. Uppsala: University of Uppsala.Google Scholar
Johnson, M.H. 1989. Conceptions of Agency in Archaeological Interpretation. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 8:189–211.Google Scholar
Johnston, C. 2008. Beyond the Clearing: Towards a Dwelt Animal Geography. Progress in Human Geography, 32 (5):633–49.Google Scholar
Johnston, R. 2008. The Place and Materiality of an Upland Field System at Cwm Ffydlas, North Wales. In: Chadwick, A.M., ed. Recent Approaches to the Archaeology of Land Allotment. British Archaeological Reports International Series S1875. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 111–20.Google Scholar
Jones, A.M. 2002. Archaeological Theory and Scientific Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, A.M. 2012. Prehistoric Materialities: Becoming Material in Prehistoric Britain and Ireland. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, A.M. & MacGregor, G. eds. 2002. Colouring the Past: the Significance of Colour in Archaeological Research. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Jones, O. & Cloke, P. 2008. Non-human Agencies: Trees, Relationality, Time and Place. In: Knappett, C. & Malafouris, L., eds. Material Agency: Towards a Non-anthropocentric Approach. New York: Springer, pp. 79–96.Google Scholar
Joy, J. 2009. Reinvigorating Object Biography: Reproducing the Drama of Object Lives. World Archaeology, 41 (4):540–56.Google Scholar
Joyce, R.A. 2008. Practice in and as Deposition. In: Mills, B.J. & Walker, W.H., eds. Memory Work: Archaeologies of Material Practices. Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press, pp. 25–39.Google Scholar
Kavari, J.U. & Bleckmann, L.E. 2009. Otjiherero Praises of Places: Collective Memory Embedded in Landscape and the Aesthetic Sense of a Pastoral People. In: Bollig, M. & Bubenzer, O., eds. African Landscapes: Interdisciplinary Approaches. New York: Springer, pp. 473–500.Google Scholar
Kopytoff, I. 1986. The Cultural Biography of Things: Commoditization as a Process. In: Appadurai, A., ed. The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 64–91.Google Scholar
Latham, I.D. 1995. A Topographic Survey of the Roman Ridge at Wath Wood, Rotherham. In: Cumberpatch, C.G., McNeil, J. & Whiteley, S.P., eds. Archaeology in South Yorkshire 1994–1995. Sheffield: South Yorkshire Archaeological Service, pp. 60–62.Google Scholar
Latour, B. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester/Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Law, J. & Hassard, J. eds. 1999. Actor Network Theory and After. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Law, J. & Mol, A. 2008. The Actor-Enacted: Cumbrian Sheep in 2001. In: Knappett, C. & Malafouris, L., eds. Material Agency: Towards a Non-anthropocentric Approach. New York: Springer, pp. 57–77.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, H. 1991 [1974]. The Production of Space, trans. by Nicolson-Smith, D. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, H. 2004. Rhythmanalysis: Space, Time and Everyday Life, trans. by Elden, S. & Moore, G. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Lingis, A. 1998. The Imperative. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
LiPuma, E. 1998. Modernity and Forms of Personhood in Melanesia. In: Lambek, M. & Strathern, A., eds. Bodies and Persons: Comparative Views from Africa and Melanesia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 53–79.Google Scholar
Lorimer, H. 2006. Herding Memories of Humans and Animals. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 24:497–518.Google Scholar
Lorimer, J. 2010. Moving Image Methodologies for More-than-Human Geographies. Cultural Geographies, 17 (2):237–58.Google Scholar
Lucas, G. 2012. Understanding the Archaeological Record. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lucas, G. 2013. Afterword: Archaeology and the Science of New Objects. In: Alberti, B., Jones, A.M. & Pollard, J., eds. Archaeology after Interpretation: Returning Materials to Archaeological Theory. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press, pp. 369–80.Google Scholar
Lucy, S. 1998. The Early Anglo-Saxon Cemeteries of East Yorkshire: An Analysis and Reinterpretation. British Archaeological Reports British Series 272. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.Google Scholar
Macnaghten, P. & Urry, J. 1998. Contested Natures. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Margary, I.D. 1973. Roman Roads in Britain, 3rd ed. London: John Baker.Google Scholar
McFadyen, L. 2006. Landscape. In: Conneller, C. & Warren, G., eds. Mesolithic Britain and Ireland: New Approaches. Stroud: Tempus, pp. 121–38.Google Scholar
McFadyen, L. 2007. Neolithic Architecture and Participation: Practices of Making at Long Barrow Sites in Southern Britain. In: Last, J., ed. Beyond the Grave: New Perspectives on Barrows. Oxford: Oxbow, pp. 22–29.Google Scholar
McFadyen, L. 2013. Designing with Living: A Contextual Archaeology of Dependent Architecture. In: Alberti, B., Jones, A.M. & Pollard, J., eds. Archaeology after Interpretation: Returning Materials to Archaeological Theory. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press, pp. 135–50.Google Scholar
McOmish, D., Field, D. & Brown, G. 2002. The Field Archaeology of the Salisbury Plain Training Area. Swindon: English Heritage.Google Scholar
Miller, D. 2007. Stone Age or Plastic Age? Archaeological Dialogues, 14 (1):23–27.Google Scholar
Mlekuž, D. 2013. The Birth of the Herd. Society and Animals, 21:150–61.Google Scholar
Moore, H.L. 1994. A Passion for Difference. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Morris, C. 1999. Grim's Ditch, Thorpe Park, Austhorpe, Leeds, West Yorkshire. Archaeological Excavation. Unpublished report, Leeds: Archaeological Services WYAS.Google Scholar
Morris, J. 2008. Associated Bone Groups: One Archaeologist's Rubbish is Another's Ritual Deposition. In: Davis, O., Waddington, K. & Sharples, N., eds. Changing Perspectives on the First Millennium BC. Proceedings of the Iron Age Research Student Seminar 2006. Oxford: Oxbow, pp. 83–98.Google Scholar
Murdoch, J. 1997. Inhuman/Nonhuman/Human: Actor-Network Theory and the Potential for a Non-dualistic and Symmetrical Perspective on Nature and Society. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 15:731–56.Google Scholar
Myers, F.M. 1991. Pintupi Country, Pintupi Self: Sentiment, Place, and Politics among Western Desert Aborigines. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Olsen, B. 2010. In Defense of Things: Archaeology and the Ontology of Objects. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
Olsen, B. 2012. After Interpretation: Remembering Archaeology. Current Swedish Archaeology, 20:11–34.Google Scholar
Osgood, R. 2006. The Dead of Tormarton: Bronze Age Combat Victims? In Otto, T., Thrane, H. & Vankilde, H., eds. Warfare and Society: Archaeological and Social Anthropological Perspectives. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press, pp. 331–40.Google Scholar
Oswald, A. 2011. Prehistoric Linear Boundary Earthworks. Swindon: Historic England.Google Scholar
Overing, J. & Passes, A. eds. 2000. The Anthropology of Love and Anger: The Aesthetics of Conviviality in Native Amazonia. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Owoc, M.A. 2005. From the Ground up: Agency, Practice, and Community in the Southwestern British Bronze Age. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 12 (4):257–81.Google Scholar
Parker Pearson, M. 2004. Earth, Chalk, Wood and Stone: Materiality and Stonehenge. In: Boivin, N. & Owoc, M.A., eds. Soils, Stones and Symbols: Cultural Perceptions on the Mineral World. London: UCL Press, pp. 71–90.Google Scholar
Pearson, M. 2007. ‘In Comes I’: Performance, Memory and Landscape. Exeter: Exeter University Press.Google Scholar
Pollard, J. 2013. From Ahu to Avebury: Monumentality, the Social, and Relational Ontologies. In: Alberti, B., Jones, A.M. & Pollard, J., eds. Archaeology after Interpretation: Returning Materials to Archaeological Theory. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press, pp. 177–96.Google Scholar
Poole, F.J.P. 1994. Socialization, Enculturation and the Development of Personal Identity. In: Ingold, T., ed. Companion Encyclopaedia of Anthropology. London: Routledge, pp. 831–60.Google Scholar
Preston, F.L. 1950. A Field Survey of the ‘Roman Rig’ Dyke, in South-West Yorkshire. Transactions of the Hunter Archaeological Society, 8:285–309.Google Scholar
Probyn, E. 2000. Carnal Appetites. FoodSexIdentities. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Richards, J.C. 1978. The Archaeology of the Berkshire Downs: An Introductory Survey. Reading: Berkshire Archaeological Committee.Google Scholar
Riley, D.N. 1957. Investigation of Entrance through the ‘Roman Ridge’ in Shepherd's Plantation, Greasebrough, nr. Rotherham. Transactions of the Hunter Archaeological Society, 7:18–19.Google Scholar
Robb, J. 2004. The Extended Artefact and the Monumental Economy: A Methodology for Material Agency. In: Demarrais, E., Gosden, C. & Renfrew, C., eds. Rethinking Materiality: The Engagement of Mind with the Material World. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, pp. 131–39.Google Scholar
Roberts, I., Deegan, A. & Berg, D. 2010. Understanding the Cropmark Landscapes of the Magnesian Limestone. Leeds: Archaeological Services WYAS/English Heritage.Google Scholar
Sauer, E.W. 2005. Linear Earthwork, Tribal Boundary and Ritual Beheading: Aves Ditch from the Iron Age to the Early Middle Ages. British Archaeological Reports British Series 402. Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Sharples, N. 2010. Social Relations in Later Prehistory: Wessex in the First Millennium BC. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sheller, M. & Urry, J. 2006. The New Mobilities Paradigm. Environment and Planning A, 38:207–26.Google Scholar
Spratt, D.A. 1989. Linear Earthworks of the Tabular Hills of Northeast Yorkshire. Sheffield: Department of Archaeology and Prehistory.Google Scholar
Stenton, M. 2011. Wincobank Hill, Sheffield. Desk-based Assessment. Unpublished report, Sheffield: ArcHeritage.Google Scholar
Stoertz, C. 1997. Ancient Landscapes of the Yorkshire Wolds. London: Royal Commission on the Historical Monuments of England.Google Scholar
Strathern, M. 1988. The Gender of the Gift: Problems with Women and Problems with Society in Melanesia. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sturt, F. 2006. Local Knowledge is Required: A Rhythmanalytical Approach to the Late Mesolithic and Early Neolithic of the East Anglian Fenland, UK. Journal of Maritime Archaeology, 1:119–39.Google Scholar
Thomas, N. 1991. Entangled Objects. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tilley, C. 1999. Metaphor and Material Culture. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tilley, C. 2007. Materiality in Materials. Archaeological Dialogues, 14 (1):16–20.Google Scholar
Travis, J.R. 2001. Wath Wood and Boyd Royd Wood: An Archaeological Survey. Transactions of the Hunter Archaeological Society, 21:1–42.Google Scholar
Tuck-Po, L. 2008. Before a Step too Far: Walking with Batek Hunter–Gatherers in the Forests of Pahang, Malaysia. In: Ingold, T. & Vergunst, J.L., eds. Ways of Walking: Ethnography and Practice on Foot. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 21–34.Google Scholar
Tullett, A. 2010. Information Highways – Wessex Linear Ditches and the Transmission of Community. In: Sterry, M., Tullett, A. & Ray, N., eds. In Search of the Iron Age: Proceedings of the Iron Age Research Student Seminar 2008, University of Leicester. Leicester Archaeology Monographs 18. Leicester: University of Leicester Press, pp. 111–26.Google Scholar
Wacher, J. 1966. Excavations at Riplingham, East Yorkshire. Yorkshire Archaeological Journal, 41:608–69.Google Scholar
Watts, C. 2013. Relational Archaeologies: Roots and Routes. In: Watts, C., ed. Relational Archaeologies: Humans, Animals, Things. London: Routledge, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
Webmoor, T. & Witmore, C.L. 2008. Things are Us! A Commentary on Human/Things Relations under the Banner of a ‘Social’ Archaeology. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 41 (1):53–70.Google Scholar
Whatmore, S. 2002. Hybrid Geographies. Natures Cultures Spaces. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Wheelhouse, P. & Burgess, A. 2001. The Linear Earthworks. In: Roberts, I., Burgess, A. & Berg, D., eds. A New Link to the Past. The Archaeological Landscape of the M1-A1 Link Road. Yorkshire Archaeology 7. Leeds: West Yorkshire Archaeology Service, pp. 123–48.Google Scholar
Whittaker, E. 1992. The Birth of the Anthropological Self and its Career. Ethos, 20:191–219.Google Scholar
Wilmott, T. 1993. Excavation and Survey on the Line of Grim's Ditch, West Yorkshire 1977–83. Yorkshire Archaeological Journal, 65:55–74.Google Scholar
Wyatt, I. 2004. The Landscape of the Icelandic Sagas: Text, Place and National Identity. Landscapes, 5 (1):55–72.Google Scholar