Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:25:45.356Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Michael Dietler. Archaeologies of Colonialism: Consumption, Entanglement, and Violence in Ancient Mediterranean France (Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press, 2010 464pp., 95 figs., ISBN 978-0-520-26551-6)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

Sandra Montón-Subías
Sandra Montón-Subías*
Affiliation:
ICREA, Departament d'Humanitats, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
European Journal of Archaeology , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , 2012 , pp. 550 - 554
Copyright
Copyright © European Association of Archaeologists 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Casella, E.C., Voss, B. eds. 2012. The Archaeology of Colonialism: Intimate Encounters and Sexual Effects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grosfoguel, R. 2006. La Descolonización de la Economía Política y los Estudios Postcoloniales: Transmodernidad, Pensamiento Fronterizo y Colonialidad Globlal. Tabula Rasa, 4: 17–48.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. 1988. Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies, 14 (3): 575–99.Google Scholar
Monton-Subías, S. 2010. Black Swans and Archaeological Interpretation. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 43 (1): 1–11.Google Scholar
Quijano, A. 2011. Coloniality and Modernity/Rationality. Cultural Studies, 21 (2–3): 168–77.Google Scholar