Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T01:52:40.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Danube and settlement prehistory – 80 years on

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

John Chapman
John Chapman*
Affiliation:
Durham University, UK
*
[email: [email protected]]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although commentators have discussed myriad themes presented in the rich and extensive oeuvre of Childe, one of the topics that has been, in my view, seriously neglected is the topic of settlement types. In this article, I seek to make good this omission, starting from a consideration of The Danube in Prehistory. The basis of Childe's ideas on settlement types in the Neolithic and Copper Age of eastern Europe was a binary classification into ‘tells’ and ‘flat sites’ that, in turn, reflected a division between permanent and shifting cultivation and greater and lesser cultural complexity. However, the introduction into this debate of questions of trade, surplus production, and Neolithic ‘self-sufficiency’, as well as metallurgy and ritual, meant that the initial binary classification left a series of contradictions that Childe struggled to transcend in the last decade of his life.

Bien qu'on ait examiné un nombre infini des thèmes présentés dans la riche et importante œuvre de Childe, un des sujets à mes yeux largement négligés sont les types d'habitat. J'essaie dans cet article de parer quelque peu à cette omission en partant d'une analyse de Le Danube dans la préhistoire. À la base des idées de Childe sur les types de villages durant le Néolithique et l'âge du Cuivre en Europe de l'est se trouvait une classification binaire en ‘tell’ et ‘sites plats’, qui, à tour de rôle, représentait une division entre cultures permanentes et cultures itinérantes et complexité culturelle plus ou moins importante. Toutefois, avec l'introduction dans ce débat de questions concernant le commerce, la production de surplus et l'autosuffisance' néolithique de même que la métallurgie et le rituel, cette classification binaire initiale a abouti à une série de contradictions contradictions que Childe essayait de dépasser pendant la dernière décade de sa vie.

Zusammenfassung

Zusammenfassung

Während Kommentatoren tausende Themen aus dem reichen und umfangreichen Œuvre Childes diskutiert haben, ist nach Ansicht des Verf. eine der ernsthaft vernachlässigten Fragestellungen die der Siedlungstypen. In diesem Beitrag versucht Verf., ausgehend von einer Erörterung von The Danube in Prehistory, dieses Versäumnis auszuräumen. Die Basis von Childes Ideen von Siedlungstypen des Neolithikums und der Kupferzeit Osteuropas war eine binäre Klassifikation in Tells und Flachsiedlungen, die wiederum eine Unterteilung zwischen dauerhafter und wechselnder Kultivierung sowie größerer und geringerer kultureller Komplexität widerspiegelte. Allerdings zeigte der Eintritt in diese Debatte von Fragen des Handels, von Überschussproduktion und neolithischer Selbstversorgung wie auch von Metallurgie und Ritual, dass die ursprüngliche binäre Klassifikation eine Reihe von Widersprüchen besaß, um deren Überwindung sich Childe im letzten Jahrzehnt seines Lebens bemühte.

Keywords

binary classificationcultural complexityeconomic basisland ownershipNeolithic self-sufficiencytells versus flat sitesVere Gordon Childeclassification binairecomplexité culturellebase économiquepropriété des terresautosuffisancenéolithiquetells contre sites platsVere Gordon Childebinäre Klassifikationkulturelle Komplexitätökonomische BasisLandbesitzneolithische SelbstversorgungTellsiedlungenFlachsiedlungenVere Gordon Childe
Type
Articles
Information
European Journal of Archaeology , Volume 12 , Issue 1-3 , 2009 , pp. 145 - 156
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 Sage Publications 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ammermann, A.J. and Cavalli-Sforza, L.L., 1984. The Neolithic Transition and the Genetics of Populations in Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, D.W., 1994. Reading prehistoric figurines as individuals. World Archaeology 25(3):321–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bintuff, J. ed., 1984a. European Social Evolution. Bradford: University of Bradford Press.Google Scholar
Bintuff, J., 1984b. The Neolithic in Europe and social evolution. In Bintliff, J. (ed.), European Social Evolution: 83–121. Bradford: University of Bradford Press.Google Scholar
Bogaevskij, B.L., 1931. K voprosu o teorii migracij [Review of The Danube in Prehistory by V.G. Childe]. Soobščnija GAIMK 8:35–38.Google Scholar
Chapman, J., 1988. Putting pressure on population: social alternatives to Malthus and Boserup. In Bintliff, J.B., Davidson, D.A. and Grant, E.G. (eds), Conceptual Issues in Environmental Archaeology: 291–310. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Chapman, J., 1989. The early Balkan village. Varia Archaeologica Hungarica II:35–55.Google Scholar
Chapman, J., 1999. Powrót nad ‘Dunaj’: V.G. Childe, telle i archeologia osad-nictwa w neolicie i epoce miedzi Europy Wschodniej [The Danube re-visited: V.G. Childe, tells and settlement archaeology in the Neolithic and Copper Age of eastern Europe]. In Lech, J. and Stçpniowski, F.M. (eds), V Gordon Childe i Archeologia w XX wieku [V. Gordon Childe and Archaeology in the 20th Century]: 137–148. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Pwn (=Polska Akademia Nauk, Komitet Nauk Pra- i Protohistorycznch Prace, Tom III).Google Scholar
Chapman, J.C., 2000. Fragmentation in Archaeology: People, Places and Broken Objects in the Prehistory of South Eastern Europe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chapman, J. and Gaydarska, B., 2006. Parts and Wholes. Fragmentation in Prehistoric Context. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Childe, V.G., 1923. Some affinities of Chalcolithic culture in Thrace. Man 23(January):4–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childe, V.G., 1925. The Dawn of European Civilization. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner.Google Scholar
Childe, V.G., 1926. The Aryans: A Study of Indo-European Origins. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner.Google Scholar
Childe, V.G., 1927a. The Danube thoroughfare and the beginnings of civilization in Europe. Antiquity 1(1):79–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childe, V.G., 1927b. [Review of] Ursprung und verbreitung der Germanen in vor- und frühgeschichtlicher Zeit by Kossinna, G. Man 27 (March):54–55.Google Scholar
Childe, V.G., 1929. The Danube in Prehistory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Childe, V.G., 1939. The Dawn of European Civilization. 3rd edition. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner.Google Scholar
Childe, V.G., 1940. [Review of] The Prehistoric Foundations of Europe to the Mycenean Age by C.F.C. Hawkes. Antiquaries Journal 20:394–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childe, V.G., 1942. What Happened in History. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Childe, V.G., 1944. Recent excavations on prehistoric sites in Soviet Russia. Man 44 (March-April): 41–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childe, V.G., 1945. [Review of] Tripil's'ka Kultura. Antiquity 19(76):203–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childe, V.G., 1951a. [Review of] Periodizatsiya Tripolskikh Poselenii by T.S. Passek. Soviet Studies 2(4):386–389.Google Scholar
Childe, V.G., 1951b. Social Evolution. London: Watts.Google Scholar
Childe, V.G., 1954a. Early forms of society; Rotary motion; Wheeled vehicles. In Singer, C., Holmyard, E.J. and Hall, A.R. (eds), A History of Technology. Vol. 1 : 38–57, 187–215, 716–729. London and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Childe, V.G., 1954b. Part 1: prehistory. In Barker, E., Clark, G. and Vaucher, P. (eds), The European Inheritance. Vol. 3–38. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Childe, V.G., 1956. Piecing Together the Past: the Interpretation of Archaeological Data. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Childe, V.G., 1957. The Dawn of European Civilization. 6th edition. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Childe, V.G., 1958a. The Prehistory of European Society. Harmondsworth: Penguin. Childe, V.G., 1958b. Valediction. University of London Institute of Archaeology, Bulletin 1:1–8.Google Scholar
Childe, V.G., 1965. Man Makes Himself 4th edition. London: Watts.Google Scholar
Dumitrecu, V., 1925. Fouilles de Gumelniţa. Dacia II:29–103.Google Scholar
Garasšnin, M.V., 1961. The Neolithic in Anatolia and the Balkans. Antiquity 35(140):276–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gathercole, P., 1999. Studiująs Childe'a [Studying Childe]. In Lech, J. and Stępniowski, F.M. (eds), V Gordon Childe i Archeologia w XX wieku [V. Gordon Childe and Archaeology in the 20th Century]: 267–275. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Pwn (=Polska Akademia Nauk, Komitet Nauk Pra- i Protohistorycznch Prace, Tom III).Google Scholar
Gathercole, P., Irving, T.H. and Melleuish, G., eds, 1995. Childe and Australia: Archaeology, Politics and Ideas. St Lucia, QD: University of Queensland Press.Google Scholar
Gimbutas, M. 1977. The first wave of Eurasian steppe pastoralists into Copper Age Europe. journal of Indo-European Studies 5(4):277–338.Google Scholar
Green, S., 1981. Prehistorian: A Biography of V. Gordon Childe. Bradford-on-Avon: Moonraker Press.Google Scholar
Harris, D.R., ed., 1994. The Archaeology of V. Gordon Childe. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
Heurtley, W.A., 1931. [Review of] The Danube in Prehistory by V.G. Childe. Antiquity 5(17):124–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, T. and Voytek, B., 1983. Sedentism and economic change in the Balkan Neolithic. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 2(4):323–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kossinna, G., 1911. Die Herkunft der Germanen. Zur Met hode der Siedlingsarchäologie. Mannus-Bibliothek 6. Würzburg: Kabitzsch.Google Scholar
Lech, J., ed., 1997–1998. Archaeology in the 20th Century: Ideas - People - Research. Warsaw: Polish Academy of Sciences (=Archaeologia Polona 35–36).Google Scholar
Lech, J. and Stęniowski, F.M. (eds), 1999. V Gordon Childe i Archeologia w XX wieku [V. Gordon Childe and Archaeology in the 20th Century]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Pwn (=Polska Akademia Nauk, Komitet Nauk Pra- i Protohistorycznch Prace, Tom III).Google Scholar
Manzanilla, L. (ed.), 1987. Studies in the Neolithic and Urban Revolutions: The V Gordon Childe Colloquium Mexico, 1986. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports, International Series 349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNairn, B., 1980. The Method and Theory of V Gordon Childe. Economic, Social and Cultural Interpretations of Prehistory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Milojčić, V, 1949. Chronologie der jüngeren Steinzeit Mittel- und Sudosteuropas. Berlin: Walter.Google Scholar
Passek, T.S., 1949. Periodizaciya Tripol'skikh poselenij. Materialy i Issledovaniya poArkheologii 10. Moskva-Leningrad: Institute of Archaeology of USS Patterson, R., , T.C. and Orser J.R., C.E., eds, 2004. Foundations of Social Archaeology. Selected Writings of V. Gordon Childe. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C., 1986. Varna and the emergence of wealth in prehistoric Europe. In Appadurai, A. (ed.), The Social Life of Things - Commodities in Cultural Perspective: 141–168. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherratt, A., 1976. Resources, technology and trade: an essay in early European metallurgy. In Longworth, I.H. and de Sieveking, G. (eds), Problems in Social and Economic Archaeology: 557–581. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sherratt, A., 1997–1998. Gordon Childe: right or wrong? Archaeologia Polona 35–36:363–378.Google Scholar
Singuira, Y., 1987. The Neolithic Revolution, a case study: A re-evaluation of the Childean concept as applied to Jomon, Japan. In Manzanilla, L. (ed.), Studies in the Neolithic and Urban Revolutions: The V. Gordon Childe Colloquium Mexico, 1986:35–50. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports, International Series 349.Google Scholar
Trigger, B.G., 1980. Gordon Childe. Revolutions in Archaeology. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Tringham, R., 1983. Review: V. Gordon Childe 25 years after. His relevance for the archaeologies of the Eighties. Journal of Field Archaeology 10(1):85–100.Google Scholar
Tringham, R. and Krstić, D., 1990. Conclusion: Selevac in the wider context of European prehistory. In Tringham, R. and Krstić, D. (eds), and Article title. Selevac. A Neolithic Village in Yugoslavia: 567–616. Los Angeles, CA: Institute of Archaeology, University of California (=Monumenta Archaeologica Vol.15).Google Scholar
Wace, A.J.B. and Thompson, M.S., 1912. Prehistoric Thessaly. Cambridge: The University Press.Google Scholar
Wailes, B., ed., 1996. Craft Specialization and Social Evolution: in Memory of V. Gordon Childe. Philadelphia, PA: University Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology, University of Pennsylvania (University Museum Monograph 93).Google Scholar
Zvelebil, M., 1989. On the transition to farming in Europe, or what was spreading with the Neolithic: a reply to Ammerman (1989). Antiquity 63(239):379–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar