Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T12:58:19.321Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stability and bifurcation analysis of a free boundary problem modelling multi-layer tumours with Gibbs–Thomson relation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 April 2015

FUJUN ZHOU  and
JUNDE WU
FUJUN ZHOU
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510640, P.R. China email: [email protected]
JUNDE WU
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215006, P.R. China email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Of concern is the stability and bifurcation analysis of a free boundary problem modelling the growth of multi-layer tumours. A remarkable feature of this problem lies in that the free boundary is imposed with nonlinear boundary conditions, where a Gibbs–Thomson relation is taken into account. By employing a functional approach, analytic semigroup theory and bifurcation theory, we prove that there exists a positive threshold value γ* of surface tension coefficient γ such that if γ > γ* then the unique flat stationary solution is asymptotically stable under non-flat perturbations, while for γ < γ* this unique flat stationary solution is unstable and there exists a series of non-flat stationary solutions bifurcating from it. The result indicates a significant phenomenon that a smaller value of surface tension coefficient γ may make tumours more aggressive.

Keywords

35R3535B3535B3235Q92free boundary problemstabilitybifurcationtumour model
Type
Papers
Information
European Journal of Applied Mathematics , Volume 26 , Issue 4 , August 2015 , pp. 401 - 425
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Amann, H. (1995) Linear and Quasilinear Parabolic Problems, Vol. I, Birkhäuser, Basel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Arendt, W. & Bu, S. (2004) Operator-valued Fourier multipliers on periodic Besov spaces and applications. Proc. Edinb. Math. Soc. 47, 15–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Bazaliy, B. & Friedman, A. (2003) Global existence and asymptotic stability for an elliptic-parabolic free boundary problem: An application to a model of tumor growth. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 52, 1265–1304.Google Scholar
[4]Borisovich, A. & Friedman, A. (2005) Symmetry-breaking bifurcations for free boundary problems. Indiana. Uni. Math. J. 54, 927–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Byrne, H. (1999) A weakly nonlinear analysis of a model of avascular solid tumour growth. J. Math. Biol. 39, 59–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Byrne, H. & Chaplain, M. (1996) Modelling the role of cell-cell adhesion in the growth and development of carcinomas. Math. Comput. Modelling 24, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Byrne, H. & Chaplain, M. (1997) Free boundary value problems associated with the growth and development of multicellular spheroids. Eur. J. Appl. Math. 8, 639–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Chen, X., Cui, S. & Friedman, A. (2005) A hyperbolic free boundary problem modeling tumor growth: Asymptotic behavior. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 357, 4771–4804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Crandall, M. & Rabinowitz, P. (1971) Bifurcation from simple eigenvalues. J. Funct. Anal. 8, 321–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Cui, S. & Escher, J. (2007) Bifurcation analysis of an elliptic free boundary problme modeling stationary growth of avascular tumors. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 39, 210–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Cui, S. & Escher, J. (2009) Well-posedness and stability of a multidimensional tumor growth model. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 191, 173–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Cui, S. & Friedman, A. (2003) A free boundary problem for a singular system of differential equations: An application to a model of tumor growth. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 355, 3537–3590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Escher, J. (2004) Classical solutions to a moving boundary problem for an elliptic-parabolic system. Interfaces Free Bound. 6, 175–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Escher, J. & Matioc, B. (2008) On periodic Stokesian Hele-Shaw flows with surface tension. Eur. J. Appl. Math. 19, 717–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Escher, J. & Matioc, B. (2009) Existence and stability results for periodic Stokesian Hele-Shaw flows. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 40, 1992–2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Escher, J. & Simonett, G. (1997) Classical solutions for Hele-Shaw models with surface tension. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2, 619–642.Google Scholar
[17]Friedman, A. (2007) Mathematical analysis and challenges arising from models of tumor growth. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 17, 1751–1772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Friedman, A. & Hu, B. (2006) Bifurcation from stability to instability for a free boundary problem arising in a tumor model. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 180, 293–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19]Friedman, A. & Hu, B. (2007) Bifurcation for a free boundary problem modeling tumor growth by stokes equation. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 39, 174–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20]Friedman, A. & Reitich, F. (1999) Analysis of a mathematical model for the growth of tumors. J. Math. Biol. 38, 262–284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[21]Greenspan, H. (1975) On the growth and stability of cell cultures and solid tumors. J. Theor. Biol. 56, 229–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22]Kim, J., Stein, R. & O'haxe, M. (2004) Three-dimensional in vitro tissue culture models for breast cancer – a review. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 149, 1–11.Google Scholar
[23]Kyle, A., Chan, C. & Minchinton, A. (1999) Characterization of three-dimensional tissue cultures using electrical impedance spectroscopy. Biophysical J. 76, 2640–2648.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[24]Lowengrub, J.et al. (2010) Nonlinear modeling of cancer: Bridging the gap between cells and tumours. Nonlinearity 23, R1–R91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[25]Lunardi, A. (1995) Analytic Semigroups and Optimal Regularity in Parabolic Problems, Birkhäuser, Basel.Google Scholar
[26]Mueller-Klieser, W. (1997) Three dimensional cell cultures: From molecular mechanisms to clinical applications. Am. J. Cell Physiol. 273, 1109–1123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[27]Roose, T., Chapman, S. & Maini, P. (2007) Mathematical models of avascular tumor growth. SIAM Rev. 49, 179–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[28]Schmeisser, H. & Triebel, H. (1987) Topics in Fourier Analysis and Function Spaces, John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
[29]Wu, J. & Cui, S. (2009) Asymptotic stability of stationary solutions of a free boundary problem modeling the growth of tumors with fluid tissues. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 41, 391–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[30]Wu, J. & Zhou, F. (2012) Bifurcation analysis of a free boundary problem modelling tumour growth under the action of inhibitors. Nonlinearity 25, 2971–2991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[31]Wu, J. & Zhou, F. (2013) Asymptotic behavior of solutions of a free boundary problem modeling the growth of tumors with fluid-like tissue under the action of inhibitors. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 365, 4181–4207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[32]Zhou, F., Escher, J. & Cui, S. (2008) Bifurcation for a free boundary problem with surface tension modeling the growth of multi-layer tumors. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 337, 443–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[33]Zhou, F., Escher, J. & Cui, S. (2008) Well-posedness and stability of a free boundary problem modeling the growth of multi-layer tumors. J. Differ. Equ. 244, 2909–2933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar