Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:58:52.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sensitivity analysis of linear and nonlinear lithotripter models†

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 November 2010

BARBARA KALTENBACHER  and
SLOBODAN VELJOVIĆ
BARBARA KALTENBACHER
Affiliation:
Institute of Mathematics and Scientific Computing, University of Graz, Heinrichstr. 36, 8010 Graz, Austria email: [email protected], [email protected]
SLOBODAN VELJOVIĆ
Affiliation:
Institute of Mathematics and Scientific Computing, University of Graz, Heinrichstr. 36, 8010 Graz, Austria email: [email protected], [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, we perform a sensitivity analysis for shape optimization problems arising in models we suggest for a lithotripter. More precisely, we use two models based on high intensity ultrasound focusing by an acoustic lens, where through changing the shape of the lens we try to achieve a favourable focusing. The models are based on acoustic wave equations with piecewise constant coefficients, a linear and a nonlinear one, where for the nonlinear one we use the Westervelt equation. The sensitivity analysis is performed using an adjoint approach.

Type
Papers
Information
European Journal of Applied Mathematics , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , February 2011 , pp. 21 - 43
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Adams, R. A. & Fournier, J. J. F. (2003) Sobolev Spaces, 2nd ed., Elsevier, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
[2]Bamberger, A., Glowinski, R. & Tran, Q. H. (1997) A domain decomposition method for the acoustic wave equation with discontinuous coefficients and grid change. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 34 (2), 603–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Clason, C., Kaltenbacher, B. & Veljović, S. (October 2008) Boundary Optimal Control of the Westervelt and the Kuznetsov Equation. Tech. Rep., SFB-2008-013, SFB Research Center. Mathematical Optimization and Applications in Biomedical Sciences, University of Graz.Google Scholar
[4]Delfour, M. C. & Zolésio, J.-P. (1992) Structure of shape derivatives for nonsmooth domains. J. Funct. Anal. 104, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Delfour, M. C. & Zolésio, J.-P. (2001) Shapes and Geometries, SIAM.Google Scholar
[6]Dreyer, T., Kraus, W., Bauer, E. & Riedlinger, R. E. (2000) Investigations of compact focusing transducers using stacked piezoelectric elements for strong sound pulses in therapy. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, IEEE, pp. 1239–1242.Google Scholar
[7]Engquist, B. & Majda, A. (1977) Absorbing boundary conditions for the Numerical Simulation of Waves. Math. Comput. 31 (139), 629–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Hamilton, M. F. & Blackstock, D. T. (1997) Nonlinear Acoustics, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
[9]Haslinger, J. & Mäkinen, R. A. E. (2003) Introduction to Shape Pptimization: Theory, Approximation and Computation, SIAM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Evans, L. C. (1998) Partial Differential Equations, American Mathematical Society, Providence.Google Scholar
[11]Kuznetsov, V. P. (1971) Equations of nonlinear acoustics. Soviet Phys. – Acoust. 16 (4), 467–470.Google Scholar
[12]Kaltenbacher, M. (2007) Numerical Simulations of Mechatronic Sensors and Actuators, 2nd ed.Springer.Google Scholar
[13]Kaltenbacher, B., Lasiecka, I. & Veljović, S. (October 2008) Some Well-Posedness Results in Nonlinear Acoustics, Tech. Rep. IOC-21, International Doctorate Program, Identification, Optimization and Control with Applications in Modern Technologies, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg.Google Scholar
[14]Sokolowski, J. & Zolesio, J. P. (1992) Introduction to Shape Optimization, SCM 16, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Taraldsen, G. (April 2001) A generalized Westervelt equation for nonlinear medical ultrasound. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109 (4), 1329–1333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[16]Taroco, E., Buscaglia, G. C. & Feijóo, R. A. (1998) Second-order shape sensitivity analysis for nonlinear problems. Struct. Optim. 15, 101–113, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar