Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:26:46.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Laminar channel flow driven by accelerating walls

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 July 2009

P. Watson ,
W. H. H. Banks ,
M. B. Zaturska  and
P. G. Drazin
P. Watson
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics, University of Bristol, University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TW, Great Britain
W. H. H. Banks
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics, University of Bristol, University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TW, Great Britain
M. B. Zaturska
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics, University of Bristol, University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TW, Great Britain
P. G. Drazin
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics, University of Bristol, University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TW, Great Britain
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The two-dimensional flow of a viscous incompressible fluid in a channel with accelerating walls is analysed by use of Hiemenz's similarity solution. Steady flows and their instabilities are calculated, and unsteady flows are computed by solving the initial-value problem for the governing partial-differential system. Thereby, these exact solutions of the Navier–Stokes equations are found to exhibit turning points, pitchfork bifurcations, Hopf bifurcations and Takens–Bogdanov bifurcations along the route to chaos. The substantial physical result is that the chaos previously found for flows with symmetrically accelerating walls is easily destroyed by a little asymmetry.

Type
Research Article
Information
European Journal of Applied Mathematics , Volume 2 , Issue 4 , December 1991 , pp. 359 - 385
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, M. & Stegun, I. A. 1964 Handbook of Mathematical Functions. National Bureau of Standards, Washington.Google Scholar
Berman, A. S. 1953 Laminar flow in channels with porous walls. J. Appl. Phys. 24, 1232–1235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berzins, M. & Dew, P. M. 1991 Chebyshev polynomial software for elliptic-parabolic systems of PDEs. ACM Trans. Math. Software (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, J. F. & Acrivos, A. 1981 Steady flow in a channel or tube with an accelerating surface velocity: an exact solution to the Navier–Stokes equations with reverse flow. J. Fluid Mech. 112, 127–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, S. M. 1990 The transition to chaos in an asymmetric perturbation of the Lorenz system. Phys. Lett. A144, 325–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, S. M. 1991 Two-dimensional flow of a viscous fluid in a channel with porous walls. J. Fluid Mech. 227, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durlofsky, L. & Brady, J. F. 1984 The spatial stability of a class of similarity solutions. Phys. Fluids 27, 1068–1076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glendinning, P. 1987 Asymmetric perturbations of Lorenz-like equations. Dynamics & Stability of Systems 2, 43–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glendinning, P. & Sparrow, C. 1984 Local and global behaviour near homoclinic orbits. J. Stat. Phys. 35, 645–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guckenheimer, J. & Holmes, P. 1986 Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems, and Bifurcations of Vector Fields. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Proudman, I. & Johnson, K. 1962 Boundary-layer growth at a rear stagnation point. J. Fluid Mech. 12, 161–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raithby, G. D. & Knudsen, D. C. 1974 Hydrodynamic development in a duct with suction and blowing. ASME J. Appl. Mech. 41, 896–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, W. A. 1976 The existence of multiple solutions for the laminar flow in a uniformly porous channel with suction at both walls. J. Eng. Math. 10, 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrestha, G. M. & Terrill, R. M. 1968 Laminar flow with large injection through parallel and uniformly porous walls of different permeability. Quart. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 21, 413–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, C. L., Banks, W. H. H., Zaturska, M. B. & Drazin, P. G. 1991 Three-dimensional flow in a porous channel. Quart. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 4, 105–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terrill, R. M. 1964 Laminar flow in a uniformly porous channel. Aero Quart. 15, 299–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terrill, R. M. & Shrestha, G. M. 1965a Laminar flow through parallel and uniformly porous walls of different permeability. Z.A.M.P. 16, 470–482.Google Scholar
Terrill, R. M. & Shrestha, G. M. 1965b Laminar flows through a channel with uniformly porous walls of different permeability. Appl. Sci. Res. 15, 440–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, E. B. B., Banks, W. H. H., Zaturska, M. B. & Drazin, P. G. 1990 On transition to chaos in two-dimensional channel flow symmetrically driven by accelerating walls. J. Fluid Mech. 212, 451–485 (referred to in this text as WBZD).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, P. 1989 Symmetry breaking in laminar channel flow driven by accelerating walls. MSc Dissertation, University of Bristol.Google Scholar
Zaturska, M. B., Drazin, P. G. & Banks, W. H. H. 1988 On the flow of a viscous fluid driven along a channel by suction at porous walls. Fluid Dyn. Res. 4, 151–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar