Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T03:51:13.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Integral constraints in multiple-scales problems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 January 2015

S. J. CHAPMAN
Affiliation:
Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, ROQ, Woodstock Road, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK emails: [email protected], [email protected]
S. E. MCBURNIE
Affiliation:
Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, ROQ, Woodstock Road, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK emails: [email protected], [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Asymptotic homogenisation via the method of multiple scales is considered for problems in which the microstructure comprises inclusions of one material embedded in a matrix formed from another. In particular, problems are considered in which the interface conditions include a global balance law in the form of an integral constraint; this may be zero net charge on the inclusion, for example. It is shown that for such problems care must be taken in determining the precise location of the interface; a naive approach leads to an incorrect homogenised model. The method is applied to the problems of perfectly dielectric inclusions in an insulator, and acoustic wave propagation through a bubbly fluid in which the gas density is taken to be negligible.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

References

[1]Bensoussan, A., Lions, J.-L. & Papanicolaou, G. (1978) Asymptotic Analysis for Periodic Structures, Studies in Mathematics and Its Applications, Vol. 5, North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
[2]Caflisch, R. E., Miksis, M. J., Papanicolaou, G. C. & Ting, L. (1985) Wave propagation in bubbly liquids at finite volume fraction. J. Fluid. Mech. 160, 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Davit, Y., Bell, C. G., Byrne, H. M., Chapman, L. A. C., Kimpton, L. S., Lang, G. E., Leonard, K. H. L., Oliver, J. M., Pearson, N. C., Shipley, R. J., Waters, S. L., Whiteley, J. P., Wood, B. D. & Quintard, M. (2013) Homogenization via formal multiscale asymptotics and volume averaging: How do the two techniques compare? Adv. Water Resour. 62, 178206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Hashin, Z. & Shtrikman, S. (1962) A variational approach to the theory of the effective magnetic permeability of multiphase materials. J. Appl. Phys. 33, 3125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Hinch, E. J. (1991) Perturbation Methods, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Kevorkian, J. K. & Cole, J. D. (1981) Perturbation Methods in Applied Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Pavliotis, G. A. & Stuart, A. M. (2008) Multiscale Methods: Averaging and Homogenization, Springer Science + Business Media, LLC.Google Scholar
[8]Torquato, S. (1991) Random heterogeneous media: Microstructure and improved bounds on effective properties. Appl. Mech. Rev. 44, 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Torquato, S. (2000) Modeling of physical properties of composite materials. Int. J. Solids Struct. 37, 411422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Whitaker, S. (1999) The Method of Volume Averaging, Theory and Applications of Transport in Porous Media, Vol. 13, Springer Science + Business Media, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar