The long QT syndrome is a disorder of myocardial electrical conduction that leaves the heart vulnerable to the ventricular tachydysrhythmia torsade de pointes. Clinically, this results in syncope or sudden death. The long QT syndrome may be congenital, if caused by abnormal myocardial potassium or sodium ion channels, or acquired, if due to drugs, electrolyte abnormalities or metabolic conditions. Triggers for the development of torsade de pointes include both anaesthesia and surgery. Some anaesthetic agents prolong the QT interval. The condition is reviewed and suggestions are made for the anaesthetic management of affected patients.

Laudanosine is a metabolite of the neuromuscular-blocking drugs atracurium and cisatracurium with potentially toxic systemic effects. It crosses the blood-brain barrier and may cause excitement and seizure activity. Its interest in recent years has increased because of the recognized interaction with γ-aminobutyric acid, opioid and nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. It has been shown to produce analgesia in animals. In the cardiovascular system, high plasma concentrations produce hypotension and bradycardia. In hepatic failure, its elimination halflife is prolonged but only moderate accumulation occurs in adults, whereas in infants and children plasma concentration are greater. In patients undergoing liver transplantation, laudanosine concentrations are increased during preanhepatic, anhepatic and postanhepatic stages. Patients with renal failure have higher plasma concentrations and a longer mean elimination half-life. In pregnancy, laudanosine crosses the placental barrier. The mean transplacental transfer is 14% of maternal blood concentrations. Except for prolonged administration of atracurium in intensive care units, laudanosine accumulation and related toxicity seem unlikely to be achieved in clinical practice. When cisatracurium is used, plasma concentrations of laudanosine are lower. Further studies are needed, especially around the interactions with γ-aminobutyric acid, opioid and nicotinic acetylcholine receptors.

Both the numbers of children undergoing day case surgery and the type of procedures performed in this way are increasing. This expansion will only be beneficial if anaesthesia and surgery are provided with minimal postoperative morbidity e.g. postoperative delirium or nausea and vomiting. The choice of anaesthetic technique is considered critical to optimizing the service provided to patients and for this reason much research has addressed this question. This review considers the effect of anaesthetic technique on postoperative outcome in paediatric day case surgery. The outcome measures reviewed by this article are induction of anaesthesia, effects on the cardiovascular system, recovery from anaesthesia and postoperative nausea and vomiting. In each section both quantitative and qualitative outcome measures are discussed. Comparisons are made between sevoflurane and halothane, sevoflurane and propofol, propofol and halothane, desflurane and halothane and the presence or absence of nitrous oxide.

Background and objective: To evaluate the ease with which successful insertion of a laryngeal mask airway can be performed in comparison with endotracheal intubation by medical personnel wearing chemical protective equipment.

Methods: Anaesthetists and non-anaesthetists (each n = 20) participated in the prospective comparative trial in an animal laboratory. The time and success rates of laryngeal mask airway vs. endotracheal tube insertions were measured as performed on anaesthetized monkeys.

Results: The results showed that the laryngeal mask airway was inserted more rapidly than the endotracheal tube by both groups (3.6 s and 28.6 s, P < 0.0001). Failed intubation occurred in 35% (anaesthetists) vs. 55% (non-anaesthetists) (P = 0.17).

Conclusions: In view of the 100% success rate of insertion even in unfavourable conditions, the possible role of the laryngeal mask airway in the scenario of a toxic mass casualty event should be considered.

Ischaemia reperfusion injury is a common and important phenomenon that occurs predictably in patients undergoing such procedures as cardiopulmonary bypass, thrombolysis, surgery under tourniquet, organ transplantation or embolectomy. Oxidative stress and the resulting lipid peroxidation play a major role in reperfusion injury. Membrane and cellular dysfunction result and, subsequently, organ injury or failure may ensue. Traditional methods of quantifying ischaemia reperfusion injury, including measurement of malondialdehyde, lack specificity and sensitivity. It was reported in 1990 that isoprostanes, a series of prostaglandin-like compounds, are produced by the free radical-catalyzed peroxidation of arachidonic acid. Measurement of the isoprostane concentration in urine or plasma provides the most reliable, non-invasive method currently available to assess oxidative stress in vivo. Serial measurement of isoprostanes in biological fluids has enhanced our understanding of the mechanisms underlying ischaemia reperfusion injury itself and its role in certain diseases. Furthermore, measurement of the isoprostane concentration provides a means to assess the effects of prophylactic and therapeutic interventions. In the future, the development of rapid, simple assays for isoprostanes offers the potential to assess prognosis during and after ischaemia reperfusion events.

Anaphylactic reactions to anaesthetic and associated agents used during the perioperative period have been reported with increasing frequency in most developed countries. Any drug administered in the perioperative period can potentially produce life-threatening immune-mediated anaphylaxis. Most published reports on the incidence of anaphylaxis come from France, Australia, the UK and New Zealand. These reflect an active policy of systematic clinical and/or laboratory investigation of suspected immune-mediated reactions. The estimated incidence of anaphylaxis ranges from 1 : 10 000 to 1 : 20 000. Muscle relaxants (69.1%) and latex (12.1%) were the most frequently involved drugs according to the most recent French epidemiological survey. Clinical symptoms do not afford an easy distinction between immune-mediated anaphylactic reactions and anaphylactoid reactions resulting from direct non-specific histamine release. Moreover, when restricted to a single clinical symptom, anaphylaxis can easily be misdiagnosed. Pre- and postoperative investigation must be performed to confirm the nature of the reaction, the responsibility of the suspected drugs and to provide precise recommendations for future anaesthetic procedures. These include plasma histamine, tryptase and specific IgE concentration determination at the time of the reaction and at skin tests 6 weeks later. In addition, since no specific treatment has been shown reliably to prevent the occurrence of anaphylaxis, allergy assessment must be performed in all high-risk patients. Treatment of anaphylaxis is aimed at interrupting contact with the responsible antigen, inhibiting mediator production and release, and modulating the effects of released mediators. It must be initiated as quickly as possible and relies on widely accepted principles. Finally, the need for proper epidemiological studies and the relative complexity of allergy investigation should be underscored. They represent an incentive for further development of allergo-anaesthesiology clinical networks to provide expert advice for anaesthetists and allergologists.

Patients receiving anticoagulants offer a challenge to anaesthesiologists. The issue of spinal haematoma following central neuraxial block in such patients is a contentious issue. Although rare, with an estimated incidence of <1 : 150 000 for epidural blocks and 1 : 220 000 for spinal anaesthetics in patients with normal coagulation status, this is an emergency situation with a potentially grave prognosis. The review presents cases of spinal haematomata that have occurred in the last 5 years, both spontaneously and after central neuraxial blockade. Of the 60 cases reported in the literature, 33% occurred following central neuraxial block and, of these, 55% were associated with concomitant use of anticoagulants. The pharmacology of the newer and older anticoagulants is also described. The variety of risk factors and diverse recommendations that have been described in these patients are reviewed.

Cardiac arrest is a dramatic condition leading to sudden death if someone cannot perform two interventions, basic life support and early defibrillation, that have been proved to improve long-term survival. The modern era of cardiopulmonary resuscitation began with a description of closed chest cardiac massage by Kouwenhoven in 1960. Research to make advances in cardiac arrest is a very difficult task. Experts set up a series of guidelines that represent a keystone for educational needs and evolving technology. There is a consensus that the highest potential survival rate from cardiac arrest can only be achieved when the following sequence of events occurs as rapidly as possible: (1) recognition of early warning signs, (2) activation of the emergency medical services, (3) basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation, (4) cardiac defibrillation, (5) management of the airway and ventilation of the lungs, and (6) intravenous (i.v.) administration of medications. These events are necessary for any success of emergency cardiovascular care. They are linked in a chain of survival. The links in the adult chain of survival are: early access; early CPR; early defibrillation; and early acute cardiac life support. The 'Utstein style', recently introduced, represents a standard of practice both inside and outside hospital with recommended guidelines for the uniform reporting of clinical data from the patient suffering cardiac arrest. According to the concept of the chain of survival, the Utstein style delineates time and establishes a set of core and supplemental times to be recorded that provide important characteristics of the response of victims of cardiac arrest.

Improvement in surgical techniques, technology and perioperative assessment has dramatically simplified the anaesthetic care for elective liver resection. Patients with a non-tumorous healthy liver should only need the usual preoperative assessment. Patients with pre-existing parenchymal liver disease should be specifically assessed for gas exchange impairment, alcoholic or nutritional-associated cardiomyopathy, infection, cirrhosis decompensation, acute alcoholic hepatitis, and kidney impairment. The type of anaesthetic management does not influence the intra- and postoperative courses. Intermittent clamping of the portal vascular triad is better tolerated than prolonged continuous periods of ischaemia—especially in patients with abnormal liver parenchyma. Intraoperative antibiotic prophylaxis must be administered to prevent translocation of intestinal enterobacteria to the systemic circulation in patients with both healthy and diseased livers. Blood-salvage techniques have limited indications in liver resection. Systematic invasive haemodynamic monitoring is no longer warranted. An arterial cannula should only be considered in procedures of long duration and in selected situations likely to cause anticipated circulatory impairment: total liver vascular occlusion, repeat surgery, combined organ resection, and surgery conducted on tumours >10 cm in size or in connection with the vena cava. In a recent large series of liver resections, 60% of patients did not need a blood transfusion, only 2% of transfused patients received >10 units of blood and cirrhosis was not predictive of increased intraoperative bleeding. Postoperative ascites, which always develops at the expense of circulating fluid, is a frequent occurrence in patients with healthy or diseased livers. Intra- and postoperative fluid limitation does not prevent postoperative ascites. Volume expansion, diuretics and vasopressor therapy should be initiated early to prevent kidney failure.