The flexible laryngeal mask airway has been mostly used in spontaneous ventilated children during short procedures to avoid the risk of kinking; little information has been reported about its airway morbidity. The aim of the study was to compare this airway device with the reinforced tracheal tube in mechanically ventilated adult patients.

120 adult patients undergoing general anaesthesia for breast, head and neck oncoplastic surgery, expected to last up to 3 h, were stratified into two airway groups: flexible laryngeal mask airway (n = 60) or reinforced tracheal tube (n = 60). Within each group, patients were randomly allocated to one of the two maintenance anaesthetic subgroups: propofol (n = 30) or sevoflurane (n = 30). Ease of insertion and haemodynamic stress response to placement, ventilation and postoperative morbidity were studied.

Easy insertion rate was greater for the flexible laryngeal mask airway (93% vs. 77%, P = 0.01), and the overall success in insertion rate was 100% for both groups. Haemodynamic changes were significantly higher after inserting reinforced tracheal tube (P < 0.001). Oxygen saturation and capnography were comparable in both groups but airway pressure was lower with flexible laryngeal mask airway (P = 0.002). Sore throat, cough and dysphonia were lest frequent with flexible laryngeal mask airway (P < 0.01); also more patients in this group felt comfortable. Sevoflurane gave better results in emergence time, regardless of the airway device used.

During anaesthesia in mechanically ventilated adult patients, both devices function adequately, are stable and protect the airway. Flexible laryngeal mask airway results in less postoperative morbidity than reinforced tracheal tube.

To measure the prevalence of postoperative pain, an assessment was made of 1490 surgical inpatients who were receiving postoperative pain treatment according to an acute pain protocol.

Measurements of pain (scores from 0 to 100 on a visual analogue scale) were obtained three times a day on the day before surgery and on days 0–4 postoperatively; mean pain intensity scores were calculated. Patients were classified as having no pain (score 0–5), mild pain (score 6–40), moderate pain (score 41–74) or severe pain (score 75–100).

Moderate or severe pain was reported by 41% of the patients on day 0, 30% on days 1 and 19%, 16% and 14% on days 2, 3 and 4. The prevalence of moderate or severe pain in the abdominal surgery group was high on postoperative days 0–1 (30–55%). A high prevalence of moderate or severe pain was found during the whole of days 1–4 in the extremity surgery group (20–71%) and in the back/spinal surgery group (30–64%).

We conclude that despite an acute pain protocol, postoperative pain treatment was unsatisfactory, especially after intermediate and major surgical procedures on an extremity or on the spine.

Partial obstruction of endotracheal tubes due to accumulation of secretions and mucus plugs can increase the tube resistance and subsequently impose increased resistive load on the patient. This study was performed to determine the changes in the resistance of endotracheal tubes of sizes 7.5, 8.0 and 8.5 mm with different degrees and locations of endotracheal tube narrowing.

Reductions of 10%, 25%, 50% and 75% in the endotracheal tube’s cross-sectional areas were created at different sites along the axes of the tube connected to an artificial lung. While ventilating with a constant inspiratory flow, a 1 s end-inspiratory occlusion manoeuvre was applied and the resulting plateau pressure was determined. The resistance was calculated as (peak airway pressure – plateau pressure)/peak inspiratory flow.

Significant increases in the endotracheal tube’s resistances were observed as the tube’s cross-sectional area reduction was increased from 25% to 50% and from 50% to 75% for the 7.5 mm endotracheal tube, from 25% to 50% for the 8.0 mm endotracheal tube, and from 50% to 75% for the 8.5 mm endotracheal tube. Changes of the endotracheal tube resistances were not affected by the site of cross-sectional area reductions along the axes of the tubes.

For endotracheal tubes of sizes 7.5, 8.0 and 8.5 mm, significant changes in the tubes resistances are observed when the partial obstructions of the tubes exceed certain critical values. The location of the partial obstruction did not affect the changes in the endotracheal tube resistances.

Previous research has shown that a preoperative assessment clinic enhances hospital cost-efficiency. However, the differences in organization of the patient flow have not been analysed. In this descriptive study, we evaluated the consequences of the organization of the patient flow of a preoperative assessment clinic on its performance, by analysing two Dutch university hospitals, which are organized essentially differently.

In the final analysis, the study included 880 patients who visited either academic centre. The performance of the two preoperative assessment clinics was evaluated by measuring patient flow time, various procedure times and the total waiting time. Patients’ age, ASA physical status and any preoperative tests requested by the physician were also recorded.

There was a significant difference in patient flow time between the two preoperative assessment clinics. More time was needed for the preoperative assessment when patients’ ASA class was higher. The patient flow time was longer when electrocardiogram and venepuncture were performed at the general outpatient laboratory than when they were performed at the preoperative assessment clinic due to longer waiting times. More tests were requested when they were performed at the preoperative assessment clinic.

This study shows that the organization of patient flow is an important aspect of the logistic processes of the preoperative assessment clinic. It might influence patient flow times as well as the number of preoperative tests requested. Together with other aspects of logistic performance, patient satisfaction and quality of medical assessment, patient flow logistics can be used to assess the quality of a preoperative assessment clinic.

Tonsillectomy is frequently associated with postoperative pain of considerable duration, which is usually accompanied by the substantial consumption of both opioid and non-opioid analgesics. Despite the use of different surgical and anaesthetic techniques in the search for safe and effective post-tonsillectomy pain relief, this problem remains a clinical dilemma. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the potential effects of topically administered ketamine and morphine by an oral rinse into the tonsillar fossae.

In all, 60 children, 15 for each group, aged between 3 and 12 yr scheduled for tonsillectomy were randomly assigned to one of four groups. Study drugs were administered to both tonsillar fossae for 5 min. Group K received 0.4 mL (20 mg) ketamine in 10 mL artificial saliva, Group KM received 0.4 mL (20 mg) ketamine + 5 mL (20 mg) 4‰ morphine aqueous solution in 5 mL artificial saliva, Group M received 5 mL (20 mg) 4‰ morphine aqueous solution in 5 mL artificial saliva, Group C received only 10 mL artificial saliva. Postoperative pain, nausea, vomiting, sedation and bleeding were evaluated.

Pain scores were higher in the control group at arrival in the recovery ward (P < 0.05). Morphine and ketamine groups had longer effective analgesia time than the morphine + ketamine and control groups. The 24-h analgesic consumption was significantly higher in the control group.

Topical ketamine and morphine seems to be a safe and easy analgesic approach for decreasing adenotonsillectomy pain.

Massive post-partum haemorrhage continues to be one of the world’s leading causes of maternal morbidity and mortality. Any new treatment that potentially helps at risk parturients should be thoroughly investigated. Recombinant factor VIIa (rVIIa) is increasingly being used in the treatment of massive haemorrhage. We performed a case-matched analysis of its use since 2003 in the treatment of massive post-partum haemorrhage at our hospital.

Twenty-eight cases of massive post-partum haemorrhage were identified over a 3-yr period since 2003. In six of these cases, rVIIa was used as part of their management. Six case-matched controls were sought. The six women with the greatest requirement for packed red cell transfusion who also had a deranged prothrombin time were included. The groups were then compared for differences. The worst prothrombin time in each group was noted as was the best prothrombin time within 6 h, this was used as our measure of response to treatment.

There was no statistical difference in age, gestation, parity, transfusion requirements, mode of delivery or the severity of the coagulopathy between the two groups. In both groups the prothrombin time improved with management. There was no significant difference in either the magnitude of the improvement in the value of the prothrombin time or the absolute value of the best prothrombin time (P = 0.09). Five out of the six women in the rFVIIa group had normal or low prothrombin times within 6 h yet only one woman who did not receive rFVIIa had a normal prothrombin time within 6 h though this was not significant (P = 0.08).

This case-matched analysis supports the management of massive post-partum haemorrhage with appropriate resuscitation, surgical intervention and use of blood and blood products. This study does not support the routine use of rFVIIa in the management of massive obstetric haemorrhage. rFVIIa may have a role to play in this management but further studies and analyses will be required.

Intrathecal ketamine produces a short period of analgesia with stable haemodynamics. Midazolam with bupivacaine prolongs the duration of analgesia when administered intrathecally but does not prevent hypotension. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of a combination of intrathecal bupivacaine, ketamine and midazolam on the duration of analgesia and haemodynamic parameters.

A prospective, randomized, double-blind study was carried out in 60 ASA I and II patients undergoing lower limb surgery under spinal anaesthesia. Patients were divided into three groups of 20 each. Patients in all the three groups received 3 mL of hyperbaric bupivacaine (0.5%) intrathecally. In addition, patients in Groups II and III received intrathecal ketamine (0.1 mg kg−1) and the same dose of ketamine along with midazolam (0.02 mg kg−1), respectively. All patients were evaluated for block characteristics, duration of pain-free period, total rescue analgesic requirement in the 24-h postoperative period, total dose of mephenteramine to treat hypotension and any central or neurological complication.

No patients in Group II required mephenteramine while 40% of patients in Group I and 10% in Group III required mephenteramine to maintain blood pressure after spinal anaesthesia. The mean ± standard deviation duration of pain-free period was 331.5 ± 89.9, 369.7 ± 124.2 and 730.5 ± 81.5 min in Group I, II and III, respectively. The pain-free interval was significantly greater in Group III compared to Groups I and II (P < 0.001). No patient had any complications.

A low dose of midazolam and ketamine with bupivacaine intrathecally results in prolonged analgesia and less haemodynamic fluctuations. However, the safety of this combination needs to be proved before its use in clinical practice.

Epidural volume extension via a combined spinal–epidural is the enhancement of a small-dose intrathecal block by an epidural injection of physiological saline solution. We evaluated the effect of epidural volume extension on the combined spinal–epidural technique of providing spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section with hyperbaric or plain 0.5% bupivacaine.

Patients (n = 240) with height >163 cm received 9 mg and patients <163 cm received 8 mg of bupivacaine. Each study drug was combined with 20 μg fentanyl. Using the combined spinal–epidural technique, Group A (n = 60) received hyperbaric bupivacaine, and Group B (n = 60) received hyperbaric bupivacaine and 10 mL saline epidurally 5 min after subarachnoid injection. Group C (n = 60) received plain bupivacaine and Group D (n = 60) received plain bupivacaine and 10 mL saline epidurally 5 min after subarachnoid injection. An anaesthetist blinded to the anaesthetic solution injected examined the level of analgesia by the pinprick method and motor block with the modified Bromage scale for 30 min after subarachnoid injection, during the intraoperative period and subsequently every 15 min for 135 min during the recovery period.

Time to reach a sensory block at T4 was significantly shorter in Groups C and D than in Groups A (P = 0.003 and 0.017) and B (P = 0.006 and 0.048), respectively. During the intraoperative period, sensory block levels were significantly higher in Group C than in Group A. Recovery was similar in all groups; only onset was faster in Groups C and D.

There was no effect of epidural volume extension on the profile of spinal anaesthesia with the combined spinal–epidural technique for Caesarean section using hyperbaric or plain bupivacaine.

Cannulation of a central vein is an everyday procedure in anaesthesiology. However, anatomical variations of the size and/or location of the internal jugular vein might prevent cannulation, while repeated efforts might lead to severe complications. The aim of this retrospective study was to explore anatomical abnormalities of the internal jugular vein with regard to diameter of the vein’s lumen and to define their clinical significance.

The cervical regions of 93 cadavers, 186 sides in total, were dissected and the anatomical variations of internal jugular vein diameters in relation to the external jugular vein and to the common carotid artery were recorded and photographed.

The diameter of the veins in three cases were less than 6 mm, while ipsilateral external jugular veins were larger than average (3/93).

Anatomical variations of the internal jugular veins are clinically significant, especially in cases where venous access is important.

Postoperative acute renal failure predicts morbidity and mortality. We investigated the effect of nifedipine infusion on glomerular filtration rate in patients with impaired renal function undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass surgery.

Twenty patients accepted for coronary bypass and/or heart valve surgery were enrolled prospectively and randomized to nifedipine infusion or no treatment. Males and females with creatinine ⩾150 μmol L−1 and ⩾130 μmol L−1, respectively, were included. Patients with unstable angina pectoris, ejection fraction ⩽35% and those on dialysis were excluded. Glomerular filtration rate was measured preoperatively and 48 h postoperatively. Creatinine clearance was measured preoperatively and 0–4, 20–24 and 44–48 h postoperatively. There were no statistically significant differences in patient characteristics. Biochemical markers in plasma and urine were measured before and 48 h after surgery.

The mean ± SD preoperative glomerular filtration rates were 32.2 ± 11.5 and 31.4 ± 17.0 mL min−1 per 1.73 m2 in the nifedipine and control groups (P = 0.90), respectively. There was no statistically significant change in the glomerular filtration rate or in creatinine clearance over time within or between groups. A linear mixed model showed no effect of nifedipine (P = 0.44), time (P = 0.97) or interaction of nifedipine and time (P = 0.99) on creatinine clearance. Perioperative arterial pressure was kept within predefined targets. Three patients received dialysis postoperatively, all in the control group (P = 0.21). There were no statistically significant differences between groups in changes of urinary or plasma biochemistry.

Renal function was well preserved after cardiopulmonary bypass surgery in patients with impaired renal function when maintaining thorough intensive care surveillance. Nifedipine did not influence early postoperative renal function.

Our aim was to compare a continuous infusion of remifentanil with intermittent boluses of fentanyl as regards the perioperative hormonal stress response and inflammatory activation in coronary artery bypass graft patients under sevoflurane-based anaesthesia.

In all, 42 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass were prospectively randomized to a fentanyl group (n = 21, total fentanyl dose 2.6 ± 0.3 mg), or a remifentanil group (n = 21, infusion rate 0.25 μg kg−1 min−1). Haemodynamics, plasma levels of epinephrine, norepinephrine, antidiuretic hormone, adrenocorticotropic hormone, cortisol, complement activation (C3a, C5b-9), interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8 and tumour necrosis factor-α were measured at T1: baseline, T2: intubation, T3: sternotomy, T4: 30 min on cardiopulmonary bypass, T5: end of surgery and T6: 8 h postoperatively. Troponin T and creatine kinase-MB were measured postoperatively.

Patients in the remifentanil group were extubated significantly earlier than fentanyl patients (240 ± 182 min vs. 418 ± 212 min, P = 0.006). Stress hormones 30 min after start of cardiopulmonary bypass showed higher values in the fentanyl group compared to the remifentanil group (antidiuretic hormone (ADH): 39.94 ± 30.98 vs. 11.7 ± 22.8 pg mL−1, P = 0.002; adrenocorticotropic hormone: 111.5 ± 116.8 vs. 21.81 ± 24.71 pg mL−1, P = 0.01; cortisol 185 ± 86 vs. 131 ± 82 ng mL−1, P = 0.04). The interleukins were significantly higher at some perioperative time points in the fentanyl group compared to the remifentanil group (tumour necrosis factor: T5: 3.57 vs. 2.37; IL-6: T5: 4.62 vs. 3.73; and IL-8: T5: 4.43 vs. 2.65 and T6: 2.61 vs. 1.13). However, cardiopulmonary bypass times and aortic cross-clamp times were longer in the fentanyl group, which may to some extent account for the differences.

The perioperative endocrine stress response was attenuated in patients supplemented with continuous remifentanil infusion as compared to intermittent fentanyl.