Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T14:58:26.211Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Three-dimensional cervical spine movement during intubation using the Macintosh and Bullard™ laryngoscopes, the Bonfils fibrescope and the Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 January 2005

B. M. Wahlen  and
E. Gercek
B. M. Wahlen
Affiliation:
Johannes Gutenberg-University of Mainz, Clinic of Anaesthesiology, Mainz, Germany
E. Gercek
Affiliation:
Johannes Gutenberg-University of Mainz, Clinic of Trauma Surgery, Mainz, Germany
Get access

Abstract

Summary

Background and objective: Cervical spine movement may be limited for morphological reasons or through injury. The major goal of the present study was to evaluate the three-dimensional cervical spine movement during intubation with a Macintosh or Bullard laryngoscope, a Bonfils fibrescope or an intubating laryngeal mask using an ultrasound-based motion system.

Methods: Forty-eight patients without any history of cervical spine problems who had to undergo elective surgery in general anaesthesia were intubated using a Macintosh or Bullard laryngoscope, a Bonfils fibrescope or an intubating laryngeal mask airway. During intubation, cervical motion as well as overall time to intubation, number of attempts, and postoperative complaints were noted.

Results: The range of cervical spine motion during intubation, especially concerning extension, using the Macintosh laryngoscope was much greater (22.5° ± 9.9°) than using Bullard (3.4° ± 1.4°), Bonfils (5.5° ± 5.0°) or intubating laryngeal mask (4.9° ± 2.1°). Time to intubate the trachea using Bonfils (52.1 ± 22.0 s) and intubating laryngeal mask (49.8 ± 18.7 s) were much longer than with Macintosh (18.9 ± 7.1 s) and Bullard laryngoscope (16.1 ± 6.2 s) (significance level: 0.05).

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the Bullard laryngoscope may be a useful adjunct to intubate patients with cervical spine injuries. In elective situations when time to intubation is not critical Bonfils as well as intubating laryngeal mask airway should also be considered as serious alternatives to direct laryngoscopy.

Keywords

CERVICAL VERTEBRAE, movement, traumaLARYNGEAL MASKS, intubatingINTUBATION INTRATRACHEALLARYNGOSCOPES, macintosh, bullard, bonfils
Type
Original Article
Information
European Journal of Anaesthesiology , Volume 21 , Issue 11 , November 2004 , pp. 907 - 913
Copyright
2004 European Society of Anaesthesiology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Reid DC, Henderson R, Saboe L, Miller JD. Etiology and clinical course of missed spine fractures. J Trauma 1987; 27: 980–986.Google Scholar
Ajani AE, Cooper DJ, Scheinkestel CD, Laidlaw J, Tuxen DV. Optimal assessment of cervical spine trauma in critically ill patients: a prospective evaluation. Anaesth Intensive Care 1998; 26: 487–491.Google Scholar
Rhee KJ, Green W, Holcroft JW, Mangili JA. Oral intubation in the multiply injured patient: the risk of exacerbating spinal cord damage. Ann Emerg Med 1990; 19: 511–514.Google Scholar
Hastings RH, Kelley SD. Neurologic detoriation associated with airway management in a cervical spine-injured patient. Anesthesiology 1993; 78: 580–583.Google Scholar
Castro WHM, Sautmann A, Schilgen M, Sautmann M. Noninvasive three-dimensional analysis of cervical spine motion in normal subjects in relation to age and sex. An experimental examination. Spine 2000; 25: 443–449.Google Scholar
Hastings RH, Vigil AC, Hanna R, Yang BY, Sartoris DJ. Cervical spine movement during laryngoscopy with the Bullard, Macintosh, and Miller laryngoscopes. Anesthesiology 1995; 82: 859–869.Google Scholar
Brimacombe J, Berry A. The laryngeal mask airway in elective difficult intubation. J Clin Anesth 1994; 6: 450–451.Google Scholar
Asai T, Morris S. The laryngeal mask airway: its features, effects and role. Can J Anaesth 1994; 41: 930–960.Google Scholar
Brain AIJ, Verghese C, Addy EV, Kapila A, Brimacombe J. The intubating laryngeal mask. II: a preliminary clinical report of a new means of intubating the trachea. Br J Anaesth 1997; 79: 704–709.Google Scholar
Mallampati SR, Gatt SP, Gugino LD, et al. A clinical sign to predict difficult tracheal intubation: a prospective study. Can Anaesth Soc J 1985; 32: 429–434.Google Scholar
Marcus R, Peritz E, Gabriel KR. On closed testing procedures with special reference to ordered analysis of variance. Biometrika 1976; 63: 655–660.Google Scholar
Levitan RM, Kush S, Hollander JE. Devices for difficult airway management in academic emergency departments: results of a national survey. Ann Emerg Med 1999; 33: 694–698.Google Scholar
Baskett PJ, Parr MJA, Nolan JP. The intubating laryngeal mask. Results of a multicentre trial with experience of 500 cases. Anaesthesia 1998; 53: 1174–1179.Google Scholar
Agro F, Brimacombe J, Carassiti M, Marchionni L, Morelli A, Cataldo R. The intubating laryngeal mask: clinical appraisal of ventilation and blind tracheal intubation in 110 patients. Anaesthesia 1998; 53: 1084–1090.Google Scholar
Joo HS, Rose DK. The intubating laryngeal mask airway with and without fiberoptic guidance. Anesth Analg 1999; 88: 662–666.Google Scholar
Chan YW, Kong CF, Kong CS, Hwang NC, Ip-Yam PC. The intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA): initial experience in Singapore. Br J Anaesth 1998; 81: 610–611.Google Scholar
Brimacombe JR. Difficult airway management with the intubating laryngeal mask. Anesth Analg 1997; 85: 1173–1175.Google Scholar
Joo H, Rose K. Fastrach – a new intubating laryngeal mask airway: successful use in patients with difficult airways. Can J Anaesth 1998; 45: 253–256.Google Scholar
Fukutome T, Amaha K, Nakazawa K, Kawamura T, Noguchi H. Tracheal intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask airway (LMA-Fastrach) in patients with difficult airways. Anaesth Intensive Care 1998; 26: 387–391.Google Scholar
Gajraj NM, Chason DP, Shearer VE. Comparison of the Belscope with the Macintosh blades. Anaesthesia 1994; 49: 772–774.Google Scholar
MacIntyre PA, McLeod ADM, Hurley R, Peacock C. Cervical spine movements during laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia 1999; 54: 413–418.Google Scholar
Dvorak J, Antinnes JA, Panjabi M, Loustalot D, Bonomo M. Age and gender related normal motion of the cervical spine. Spine 1992; 17 (10 Suppl): S393–S398.Google Scholar
Holmes A, Wang C, Han ZH, Dang GT. The range and nature of flexion-extension motion in the cervical spine. Spine 1994; 19: 2505–2510.Google Scholar
Bonelli A, Donati P, Maltoni G, Puglisi F, Norelli GA. Neck motion evaluation after whiplash: a radiographic and kinematic protocol. Ital J Anat Embryol 2000; 105: 51–62.Google Scholar
Feipel V, Rondelet B, Le Pallec JP, Rooze M. Normal global motion of the cervical spine: an electrogoniometric study. Clin Biomech 1999; 14: 462–470.Google Scholar
Youdas JW, Garrett TR, Suman VJ, Bogard CL, Hallman HO, Carey JR. Normal range of motion of the cervical spine: an initial goniometric study. Phys Ther 1992; 72: 770–777.Google Scholar
Richter M, Wilke H-J, Kluger P, Claes L, Puhl W. Load-displacement properties of the normal and injured lower cervical spine in vitro. Eur Spine J 2000; 9: 104–108.Google Scholar
Sawin PD, Todd MM, Traynelis VC, et al. Cervical spine motion with direct laryngoscopy and orotracheal intubation. Anesthesiology 1996; 85: 26–36.Google Scholar
Watts ADJ, Gelb AW, Bach DB, Pelz DM. Comparison of the Bullard and Macintosh laryngoscopes for endotracheal intubation of patients with a potential cervical spine injury. Anesthesiology 1997; 87: 1335–1342.Google Scholar
Nolan JP, Wilson ME. Orotracheal intubation in patients with potential cervical spine injuries. Anaesthesia 1993; 48: 630–633.Google Scholar
Nolan JP, Wilson ME. An evaluation of the gum elastic bougie. Intubation times and incidence of sore throat. Anaesthesia 1992; 47: 878–881.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald RD, Krafft P, Skrbensky G, et al. Excursions of the cervical spine during tracheal intubation: blind oral intubation compared with direct laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia 1994; 49: 111–115.Google Scholar
Karhu JO, Parkkola RK, Komu MES, Kormano MJ, Koskinen SK. Kinematic magnetic resonance imaging of the upper cervical spine using a novel positioning device. Spine 1999; 24: 2046–2056.Google Scholar