Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T16:51:46.921Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Epidural levobupivacaine, ropivacaine and bupivacaine in combination with sufentanil in early labour: a randomized trial

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 July 2005

M. Camorcia  and
G. Capogna
M. Camorcia
Affiliation:
Città di Roma Hospital, Department of Anaesthesia, Rome, Italy
G. Capogna
Affiliation:
Città di Roma Hospital, Department of Anaesthesia, Rome, Italy
Get access

Abstract

Summary

Background and objective: To evaluate the efficacy, delay and duration of analgesia of three equianalgesic epidural doses of levobupivacaine, ropivacaine and bupivacaine during the first stage of labour.

Methods: One hundred and twenty-nine healthy primigravida in spontaneous labour who requested epidural analgesia were enrolled in a randomized observer-blinded study. Parturients were allocated to receive epidural levobupivacaine 0.0625%, ropivacaine 0.1% or bupivacaine 0.0625%. Sufentanil 10 μg was added to all solutions; the total volume of epidural solution was 20 mL. Pain was measured using a 100 mm visual analogue pain scale immediately before the epidural block, and at 5, 10, 15, 20 and 30 min thereafter. Motor block was evaluated using a modified Bromage scoring system. The adequacy of motor function for ambulation was also evaluated. Delay of analgesia was the time interval between the injection of the solution and the first painless contraction. Duration of analgesia was the time from the first painless contraction to the parturients' requests for further analgesia.

Results: Twelve parturients failed to complete the study. Eleven parturients had inadequate analgesia (four in Group Levobupivacaine, four in Group Ropivacaine and three in Group Bupivacaine; P > 0.05). Data was analysed from 34 parturients in Group Levobupivacaine, from 37 in Group Ropivacaine and from 35 in Group Bupivacaine. There were no differences in the delay of analgesia or in the number of parturients who were able to walk unaided. Levobupivacaine and ropivacaine produced more prolonged analgesia than bupivacaine (114 and 119 min, respectively, versus 89 min; P < 0.01).

Conclusions: During early labour, equipotent low concentrations of levobupivacaine, ropivacaine and bupivacaine, all with the addition of sufentanil 10 μg, produced similar pain relief and motor block, but levobupivacaine and ropivacaine produced a longer lasting analgesia. About 10% of parturients had inadequate analgesia with a single bolus of the tested solutions.

Keywords

ANAESTHESIA, obstetricANAESTHETIC TECHNIQUES, epiduralANAESTHETICS LOCAL, levobupivacaine, ropivacaine, bupivacaine
Type
Original Article
Information
European Journal of Anaesthesiology , Volume 20 , Issue 8 , September 2003 , pp. 636 - 639
Copyright
2003 European Society of Anaesthesiology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burke D, Henderson DJ, Simpson AM, et al. Comparison of 0.25% S(–)-bupivacaine and 0.25% RS-bupivacaine for epidural analgesia in labour. Br J Anaesth 1999; 83: 750–755.Google Scholar
Donaldson L, Young A, Eldridge J, et al. A comparison of 0.125% levobupivacaine and 0.125% bupivacaine epidural infusions for labor analgesia. Anesthesiology 1999; 90: A43.Google Scholar
Lyons G, Columb M, Wilson RC, Johnson RV. Extradural pain relief in labour: potencies of levobupivacaine and racemic bupivacaine. Br J Anaesth 1998; 81: 899–901.Google Scholar
Capogna G, Celleno D, Fusco P, Lyons G, Columb M. Relative potencies of bupivacaine and ropivacaine for analgesia in labour. Br J Anaesth 1999; 82: 371–373.Google Scholar
Polley L, Columb M, Naughton NN, Wagner DS, van de Ven CJM. Relative analgesic potencies of ropivacaine and bupivacaine for epidural analgesia in labor: implications for therapeutic indexes. Anesthesiology 1999; 90: 944–950.Google Scholar
Stienstra R, Jonker TA, Bourdez P, Kuijpers JC, van Kleef JW, Lundberg U. Ropivacaine 0.25% versus bupivacaine 0.25% for continuous epidural analgesia in labor. A double-blind comparison. Anesth Analg 1995; 80: 285–289.Google Scholar
Eddleston JM, Holland JJ, Griffin RP, Corbett A, Horsman EL, Reynolds F. A double blind comparison of 0.25% ropivacaine and 0.25% bupivacaine for extradural analgesia in labour. Br J Anaesth 1996; 76: 66–71.Google Scholar
Muir HA, Writer D, Douglas J, Weeks S, Gambling D, Macarthur A. Double blind comparison of epidural ropivacaine 0.25% and bupivacaine 0.25% for the relief of childbirth pain. Can J Anaesth 1997; 44: 599–604.Google Scholar
Owen MD, D'Angelo R, Gerancher JC, et al. 0.125% Ropivacaine is similar to 0.125% bupivacaine for labor analgesia using patient-controlled epidural infusion. Anesth Analg 1998; 86: 527–531.Google Scholar
Gautier P, De Kock M, Van Steenberge A, Miclot D, Fanard L, Hody JL. A double-blind comparison of 0.125% ropivacaine with sufentanil and 0.125% bupivacaine with sufentanil for epidural labor analgesia. Anesthesiology 1999; 90: 772–778.Google Scholar
Meister GC, D'Angelo R, Owen M, Nelson KE, Gaver R. A comparison of epidural analgesia with 0.125% ropivacaine with fentanyl versus 0.125% bupivacaine with fentanyl during labor. Anesth Analg 2000; 90: 632–637.Google Scholar
Reynolds F. Does the left hand know what the right hand is doing? An appraisal of single enantiomer local anesthetics. Int J Obstet Anesth 1997; 6: 257–269.Google Scholar
Fernández-Guisasola J, Serrano M, Cobo B, et al. A comparison of 0.0625% bupivacaine with fentanyl and 0.1% ropivacaine with fentanyl for continuous epidural labor analgesia. Anesth Analg 2001; 92: 1261–1265.Google Scholar
Lofstrom JB. The effect of local anesthetics on the peripheral vasculature. Reg Anesth 1992; 17: 1–11.Google Scholar
Aps C, Reynolds F. An intradermal study of the local anaesthetic and vascular effects of the isomers of bupivacaine. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1978; 6: 63–68.Google Scholar
Schug SA. Correction factor for comparisons between levobupivacaine and racemic bupivacaine. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2001; 26: 91.Google Scholar