Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T03:20:52.518Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Epidural bupivacaine/fentanyl infusions vs. intermittent top-ups: a retrospective study of the effects on mode of delivery in primiparous women

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2006

I. Driver
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesia, Addenbrooke’ Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, UK
P. Popham
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesia, Addenbrooke’ Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, UK
C. Glazebrook
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesia, Addenbrooke’ Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, UK
C. Palmer
Affiliation:
Department of Community Medicine, University of Cambridge, Institute of Public Health, Robinson Way, Cambridge, UK
Get access

Abstract

This study was designed to determine whether the introduction of epidural infusions containing fentanyl and bupivacaine has affected the mode of delivery in primiparous women attending our maternity department. We reviewed retrospectively the computerized records of 4362 consecutive primiparous women in labour. All the women were admitted with the expectation of a vaginal delivery. The results were analysed using logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, weight, gestation, cervical dilatation at epidural insertion, use of oxytocin, the year of entry into the study and the type of epidural block received. In women receiving an epidural block at 3–6 cm cervical dilatation (n = 1534), those who received an infusion were significantly less likely to have an emergency Caesarean section than those having intermittent ‘top-ups’ (P = 0.0019). In the same subgroup of women, the Caesarean section rate specifically for failure to progress followed the same trend, but just failed toreach statistical significance (P = 0.058). This provides evidence to support the theory that epidural infusions containing a low dose bupivacaine/fentanyl combination may reduce the risk of Caesarean section in primiparous women.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
1996 European Society of Anaesthesiology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)