Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T05:20:39.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of Valsalva manoeuvres on venepuncture pain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2006

G. Basaranoglu ,
M. Basaranoglu ,
V. Erden ,
H. Delatioglu ,
A. F. Pekel  and
L. Saitoglu
G. Basaranoglu
Affiliation:
Vakif Gureba Hospital, Department of Anaesthesiology, Istanbul, Turkey
M. Basaranoglu
Affiliation:
Selcuk University School of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Konya, Turkey
V. Erden
Affiliation:
Vakif Gureba Hospital, Department of Anaesthesiology, Istanbul, Turkey
H. Delatioglu
Affiliation:
Vakif Gureba Hospital, Department of Anaesthesiology, Istanbul, Turkey
A. F. Pekel
Affiliation:
Cerrahpasa School of Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology, Istanbul, Turkey
L. Saitoglu
Affiliation:
Vakif Gureba Hospital, Department of Anaesthesiology, Istanbul, Turkey
Get access

Extract

Summary

Background and objective: Stimulating the vagus nerve reduces pain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of a Valsalva manoeuvre, which stimulates the vagus nerve, on perception of pain during peripheral venous cannulation in adult patients. Methods: This was a prospective randomized clinical trial. One hundred and ten patients scheduled for elective surgery were randomly divided into two groups. Half of the patients, Group A, underwent venepuncture during a Valsalva manoeuvre and the other half of the patients, Group B, underwent venepuncture without performing a Valsalva manoeuvre. Patients made a pain assessment using a 0–10 point numerical rating scale. Results: The numerical rating scale score was 1.5 ± 1.2 for Group A and 3.1 ± 1.9 for Group B, the difference being statistically significant (P < 0.0001). Conclusions: On the basis of data from this study, the Valsalva manoeuvre may be of the value before venous cannulation as a simple and practical method to reduce pain from venous cannulation.

Keywords

PAIN MEASUREMENTPAIN, acuteCATHETERIZATION PERIPHERAL, venousANAESTHESIA GENERALVALSALVA MANOEUVRE
Type
Original Article
Information
European Journal of Anaesthesiology , Volume 23 , Issue 7 , July 2006 , pp. 591 - 593
Copyright
© 2006 European Society of Anaesthesiology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Smith AJ, Eggers KA, Stacey MR. Topical ibuprofen for skin analgesia prior to venepuncture. Anaesthesia 1996; 51: 495–497.Google Scholar
Speirs AF, Taylor KH, Joanes DN, Girdler NM. A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, comparative study of topical skin analgesics and the anxiety and discomfort associated with venous cannulation. Br Dent J 2001; 190: 444–449.Google Scholar
Patterson P, Hussa AA, Fedele KA, Vegh GL, Hackman CM. Comparison of 4 analgesic agents for venepuncture. Am Assoc Nurs Anesth J 2000; 68: 43–51.Google Scholar
Richman PB, Singer AJ, Flanagan M, Thode Jr HC. The effectiveness of ice as a topical anesthetic for the insertion of intravenous catheters. Am J Emerg Med 1999; 17: 255–257.Google Scholar
Selby IR, Bowles BJ. Analgesia for venous cannulation: a comparison of EMLA (5 minutes application), lignocaine, ethyl chloride, and nothing. J Roy Soc Med 1995; 88: 264–267.Google Scholar
Usichenko TI, Pavlovic D, Foellner S, Wendt M. Reducing venipuncture pain by a cough trick: a randomized crossover volunteer study. Anesth Analg 2004; 98: 343–345.Google Scholar
Kirchner A, Birklein F, Stefan H, Handwerker HO. Left vagus nerve stimulation suppresses experimentally induced pain. Neurology 2000; 55: 1167–1171.Google Scholar
Massie BM, Amidon TM. Heart. In: Tierney LM, McPhee SJ, Papadakis MA, eds. Current Medical Diagnosis and Treatment. McGraw-Hill, 2002: 363–457.
Kirchner A, Stefan H, Schmelz M, Hasbeck KN, Birklein F. Influence of vagus nerve stimulation on histamine-induced itching. Neurology 2002; 59: 108–112.Google Scholar
Ness TJ, Fillingim RB, Randich A, Backeneto EM, Faight E. Low intensity vagal nerve stimulation lowers human thermal pain thresholds. Pain 2000; 86: 81–85.Google Scholar
Ren K, Randich A, Gebhard GF. Vagal afferent modulation of a nociceptive reflex in rats: involvement of spinal opioid and monoamine receptors. Brain Res 1988; 446: 285–294.Google Scholar
Ren K, Randich A, Gebhard GF. Effects of electrical stimulation of vagal afferents on spinothalamic tracts cells in the rat. Pain 1991; 44: 311–319.Google Scholar
Ren K, Randich A, Gebhard GF. Spinal serotonergic and kappa opioid receptors mediate facilitation of the tail flick reflex produced by vagal afferent stimulation. Pain 1991; 45: 321–329.Google Scholar
Hammond EJ, Uthman BM, Wilder BJ et al. Neurochemical effects of vagus nerve stimulation in humans. Brain Res 1992; 583: 300–303.Google Scholar
Kirchner A, Birklein F, Stefan H, Handwerker HO. Vagus nerve stimulation – a new option for the treatment of chronic pain syndromes? Schmerz 2001; 15: 272–277.Google Scholar
Hord ED, Evans MS, Mueed S, Adamolekun B, Naritoku DK. The effect of vagus nerve stimulation on migraines. J Pain 2003; 4: 530–534.Google Scholar
Cason CL, Grissom NL. Ameliorating adults' acute pain during phlebotomy with a distraction intervention. Appl Nurs Res 1997; 10: 168–173.Google Scholar
Carlson KL, Broome M, Vessey JA. Using distraction to reduce reported pain, fear, and behavioral distress in children and adolescents: a multisite study. J Soc Pediatr Nurs 2000; 5: 75–85.Google Scholar
Lal MK, McClelland J, Phillips J, Taub NA, Beattie RM. Comparison of EMLA cream versus placebo in children receiving distraction therapy for venepuncture. Acta Paediatr 2001; 90: 154–159.Google Scholar
Arts SE, Abu-Saad HH, Champion GD et al. Age-related response to lidocaine–prilocaine (EMLA) emulsion and effect of music distraction on the pain of intravenous cannulation. Pediatrics 1994; 93: 797–801.Google Scholar