Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T07:25:19.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of α2-adrenoceptor agonists on tetrodotoxin-resistant Na+ channels in rat dorsal root ganglion neurons*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2007

A. Oda ,
H. Iida ,
S. Tanahashi ,
Y. Osawa ,
S. Yamaguchi  and
S. Dohi
A. Oda
Affiliation:
Gifu UniversityGraduate School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Gifu, Japan
H. Iida*
Affiliation:
Gifu UniversityGraduate School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Gifu, Japan
S. Tanahashi
Affiliation:
Gifu UniversityGraduate School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Gifu, Japan
Y. Osawa
Affiliation:
Gifu UniversityGraduate School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Gifu, Japan
S. Yamaguchi
Affiliation:
Gifu UniversityGraduate School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Gifu, Japan
S. Dohi
Affiliation:
Gifu UniversityGraduate School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Gifu, Japan
*
Correspondence to: Hiroki Iida, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu City, Gifu 501-1194, Japan. E-mail: [email protected]; Tel: +81 58 230 6404; Fax: +81 58 230 6405
Get access

Summary

Background and objective

When intrathecally or epidurally administered, α2-adrenoceptor agonists produce potent antinociception by affecting the activity of primary afferent fibres and spinal cord neurons. Recent reports have indicated that in dorsal root ganglion neurons, tetrodotoxin-resistant Na+ channels play important roles in the conduction of nociceptive sensation. We therefore investigated the effects of α2-adrenoceptor agonists on tetrodotoxin-resistant Na+ currents.

Methods

Using the whole-cell patch-clamp technique, we recorded tetrodotoxin-resistant Na+ currents from rat dorsal root ganglion neurons.

Results

Both clonidine and dexmedetomidine reduced the peak amplitude of the tetrodotoxin-resistant Na+ current concentration- and use-dependently. The concentration required for a half-maximal effect was significantly lower for dexmedetomidine (58.0 ± 10.2 μmol) than for clonidine (257.2 ± 30.9 μmol) at holding potential −70 mV. The current inhibitions induced by these agonists were not prevented by 1 μmol yohimbine, an α2-adrenoceptor antagonist. Both clonidine and dexmedetomidine shifted the inactivation curve for the tetrodotoxin-resistant Na+ current in the hyperpolarizing direction. The combinations clonidine with lidocaine and dexmedetomidine with lidocaine produced an additive blockade-type interaction on the tetrodotoxin-resistant Na+ current.

Conclusions

The results suggest that a direct inhibition of tetrodotoxin-resistant Na+ channels may contribute to the antinociceptive effects of clonidine and dexmedetomidine when used as additives to regional anaesthesia.

Keywords

ION CHANNELSSODIUM CHANNELSANAESTHESIA GENERAL, mechanism of actions of anaestheticsADRENERGIC ALPHA AGONISTS, dexmedetomidine, clonidine
Type
Original Article
Information
European Journal of Anaesthesiology , Volume 24 , Issue 11 , November 2007 , pp. 934 - 941
Copyright
Copyright © European Society of Anaesthesiology 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Presented in part at the annual meeting of the International Anesthesia Research Society, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA (2001).

References

1.Eisenach, JC, De Kock, M, Klimscha, W. Alpha(2)-adrenergic agonists for regional anesthesia. A clinical review of clonidine (1984–1995). Anesthesiology 1996; 85: 655–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Mendez, R, Eisenach, JC, Kashtan, K. Epidural clonidine analgesia after cesarean section. Anesthesiology 1990; 73: 848–852.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Asano, T, Dohi, S, Ohta, S, Shimonaka, H, Iida, H. Antinociception by epidural and systemic alpha(2)-adrenoceptor agonists and their binding affinity in rat spinal cord and brain. Anesth Analg 2000; 90: 400–407.Google ScholarPubMed
4.Filos, KS, Goudas, LC, Patroni, O, Polyzou, V. Intrathecal clonidine as a sole analgesic for pain relief after cesarean section. Anesthesiology 1992; 77: 267–274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Smith, H, Elliott, J. Alpha2 receptors and agonists in pain management. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2001; 14: 513–518.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Akopian, AN, Souslova, V, England, S et al. . The tetrodotoxin-resistant sodium channel SNS has a specialized function in pain pathways. Nat Neurosci 1999; 2: 541–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Sangameswaran, L, Delgado, SG, Fish, LM et al. . Structure and function of a novel voltage-gated, tetrodotoxin-resistant sodium channel specific to sensory neurons. J Biol Chem 1996; 271: 5953–5956.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Oda, A, Ohashi, H, Komori, S, Iida, H, Dohi, S. Characteristics of ropivacaine block of Na+ channels in rat dorsal root ganglion neurons. Anesth Analg 2000; 91: 1213–1220.Google ScholarPubMed
9.Hamill, OP, Marty, A, Neher, E, Sakmann, B, Sigworth, FJ. Improved patch-clamp techniques for high-resolution current recording from cells and cell-free membrane patches. Pflugers Arch 1981; 391: 85–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Bezanilla, F, Armstrong, CM. Inactivation of the sodium channel. I. Sodium current experiments. J Gen Physiol 1977; 70: 549–566.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Song, JH, Huang, CS, Nagata, K, Yeh, JZ, Narahashi, T. Differential action of riluzole on tetrodotoxin-sensitive and tetrodotoxin-resistant sodium channels. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1997; 282: 707–714.Google ScholarPubMed
12.Osawa, Y, Oda, A, Iida, H, Tanahashi, S, Dohi, S. The effects of class Ic antiarrhythmics on tetrodotoxin-resistant Na+ currents in rat sensory neurons. Anesth Analg 2004; 99: 464–471 table of contents.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Eisenach, JC, Shafer, SL, Bucklin, BA, Jackson, C, Kallio, A. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intraspinal dexmedetomidine in sheep. Anesthesiology 1994; 80: 1349–1359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Castro, MI, Eisenach, JC. Pharmacokinetics and dynamics of intravenous, intrathecal, and epidural clonidine in sheep. Anesthesiology 1989; 71: 418–425.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Aveline, C, Metaouna, ES, Masmoudi, A, Boelle, PY, Bonnet, F. The effect of clonidine on the minimum local analgesic concentration of epidural ropivacaine during labor. Anesth Analg 2002; 95: 735–740.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Kawamata, T, Omote, K, Kawamata, M, Iwasaki, H, Namiki, A. Antinociceptive interaction of intrathecal alpha2-adrenergic agonists, tizanidine and clonidine, with lidocaine in rats. Anesthesiology 1997; 87: 436–448.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Hao, S, Takahata, O, Iwasaki, H. Antinociceptive interaction between spinal clonidine and lidocaine in the rat formalin test: an isobolographic analysis. Anesth Analg 2001; 92: 733–738.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Berenbaum, MC. What is synergy? Pharmacol Rev 1989; 41: 93–141.Google ScholarPubMed
19.Eisenach, J, Detweiler, D, Hood, D. Hemodynamic and analgesic actions of epidurally administered clonidine. Anesthesiology 1993; 78: 277–287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Kral, MG, Xiong, Z, Study, RE. Alteration of Na+ currents in dorsal root ganglion neurons from rats with a painful neuropathy. Pain 1999; 81: 15–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed