Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:55:42.484Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of alpha-stat vs. pH-stat strategies on cerebral oximetry during moderate hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2006

M. Nauphal
Affiliation:
American University of Beirut, Department of Anesthesiology, Beirut, Lebanon
M. El-Khatib
Affiliation:
American University of Beirut, Department of Anesthesiology, Beirut, Lebanon
S. Taha
Affiliation:
American University of Beirut, Department of Anesthesiology, Beirut, Lebanon
S. Haroun-Bizri
Affiliation:
American University of Beirut, Department of Anesthesiology, Beirut, Lebanon
M. Alameddine
Affiliation:
American University of Beirut, Department of Anesthesiology, Beirut, Lebanon
A. Baraka
Affiliation:
American University of Beirut, Department of Anesthesiology, Beirut, Lebanon
Get access

Extract

Summary

Background and objectives: This study was undertaken to compare the effect of alpha-stat vs. pH-stat strategies for acid–base management on regional cerebral oxygen saturation (RsO2) in patients undergoing moderate hypothermic haemodilution cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Methods: In 14 adult patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting, an awake RsO2 baseline value was monitored using a cerebral oximeter (INVOS 5100). Cerebral oximetry was then monitored continuously following anaesthesia and during the whole period of CPB. Mean ± SD of RsO2, CO2, mean arterial pressure and haematocrit were determined before bypass and during the moderate hypothermic phase of the CPB using the alpha-stat followed by pH-stat strategies of acid–base management. Alpha-stat was then maintained throughout the whole period of CPB. Results: The mean baseline RsO2 in the awake patient breathing room air was 59.6 ± 5.3%. Following anaesthesia and ventilation with 100% oxygen, RsO2 increased up to 75.9 ± 6.7%. Going on bypass, RsO2 significantly decreased from a pre-bypass value of 75.9 ± 6.7% to 62.9 ± 6.3% during the initial phase of alpha-stat strategy. Shifting to pH-stat strategy resulted in a significant increase of RsO2 from 62.9 ± 6.3% to 72.1 ± 6.6%. Resuming the alpha-stat strategy resulted in a significant decrease of RsO2 to 62.9 ± 7.8% which was similar to the RsO2 value during the initial phase of alpha-stat. Conclusion: During moderate hypothermic haemodilutional CPB, the RsO2 was significantly higher during the pH-stat than during the alpha-stat strategy. However, the RsO2 during pH-stat management was significantly higher than the baseline RsO2 value in the awake patient breathing room air, denoting luxury cerebral perfusion. In contrast, the RsO2 during alpha-stat was only slightly higher than the baseline RsO2, suggesting that the alpha-stat strategy avoids luxury perfusion, but can maintain adequate cerebral oxygen supply-demand balance during moderate hypothermic haemodilutional CPB.

Type
EACTA Original Article
Copyright
© 2006 European Society of Anaesthesiology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Murkin J. Con: blood gases should not be corrected for temperature during hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass: α-stat mode. J Cardiothorac Anesth 1988; 2: 705707.Google Scholar
Tinker JH, Campos JH. Pro: blood gases should be corrected for temperature during cardiopulmonary bypass: pH-stat mode. Cardiothorac Anesth 1988; 2: 701704.Google Scholar
Rhan H. Body temperature and acid–base regulation. Pneumonologie 1974; 151: 8794.Google Scholar
Ream AK, Reitz BA, Silverberg G. Temperature correction of PCO2 and pH in estimating acid–base status: an example of the emperor's new clothes? Anesthesiology 1982; 56: 4144.Google Scholar
Murkin JM, Farrar JK, Tweed WA, McKenzie FN, Guiraudon G. Cerebral autoregulation and flow/metabolism coupling during cardiopulmonary bypass: the influence of PaCO2. Anesth Analg 1987; 66 (9): 825832.Google Scholar
Yao FS, Tseng CC, Ho CY et al. Cerebral oxygen desaturation is associated with early postoperative neuropsychological dysfunction in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2004; 18 (5): 552558.Google Scholar
O'Dwyer C, Porough D, Johnston W. Determinants of cerebral perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1996; 1: 5465.Google Scholar
Holzschuh M, Woertgen C, Metz C, Brawanski A. Dynamic changes of cerebral oxygenation measured by brain tissue oxygen pressure and near infrared spectroscopy. Neurol Res 1997; 19: 246248.Google Scholar
Edmonds HL, Rodriguez RA, Audenaert SM et al. The role of neuromonitoring in cardiovascular surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1996; 10: 1523.Google Scholar
Lozano S, Mossad E. Cerebral function monitors during pediatric cardiac surgery: can they make a difference. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2004; 18: 645656.Google Scholar
Daubeney PE, Pilkington SN, Janke E et al. Cerebral oxygenation measured by near-infrared spectroscopy: comparison with jugular bulb oximetry. Ann Thorac Surg 1996; 61: 930934.Google Scholar
Jobsis-Vander Vliet FF. Non-invasive, near-infrared monitoring of cellular sufficiency in vivo. Adv Exp Med Biol 1985; 191: 833841.Google Scholar
Samra SK, Stanley JC, Zelenock GB et al. An assessment of contributions made by extracranial tissues during cerebral oximetry. J Neurosurg Anesth 1999; 11: 15.Google Scholar
Baraka A, Baroody M, Haroun S et al. Continuous venous oximetry during cardiopulmonary bypass: influence of temperature changes, perfusion flow, and hematocrit levels. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1990; 1 (4): 3538.Google Scholar
Larach DR, High KM, Derr JA et al. Carbon dioxide elimination during total cardiopulmonary bypass in infants and children. Anesthesiology 1988; 69 (2): 185191.Google Scholar
Duebener LF, Hagino I, Schmitt K et al. Effects of hemodilution and phenylephrine on cerebral blood flow and metabolism during cardiopulmonary bypass. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2004; 18: 423428.Google Scholar