Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T16:58:36.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of the effects of sevoflurane and total intravenous anaesthesia in percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 July 2005

S. Atici  and
A. Aribogan
S. Atici
Affiliation:
University of Mersin, Department of Anaesthesiology, Mersin, Turkey
A. Aribogan
Affiliation:
University of Cukurova, Department of Anaesthesiology, Cukurova, Turkey
Get access

Abstract

Summary

Background and objective: Although percutaneous nephrolithotomy has many advantages over open surgery, some endocrine and haemodynamic responses have been reported. However, the effects of anaesthetic agents on these responses have not previously been reported. This study compared the effects of sevoflurane and total intravenous anaesthesia using propofol and alfentanil on the haemodynamic and hormonal changes during percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Methods: Forty-two ASA I–II patients aged between 15 and 65 yr were studied. Sevoflurane in Group S (21 patients) or TIVA in Group TIVA (21) was used for the maintenance of anaesthesia. Haemodynamic variables and serum concentrations of sodium and potassium were measured before, during and after the procedure. Arterial blood-gas status, plasma renin, aldosterone and adrenocorticotrophic hormone concentrations were measured before and during the procedure.

Results: Mean heart rate was lower during percutaneous nephrolithotomy in Group TIVA compared with Group S (P < 0.01). The mean systolic and diastolic arterial pressures were not different in both groups at any stage of measurement (P < 0.05). Plasma renin, aldosterone and adrenocorticotrophic hormone concentrations were increased during percutaneous nephrolithotomy in both groups, but the increase was greater in Group S (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: In the sevoflurane group, the concentrations of renin, aldosterone and adrenocorticotrophic hormone were significantly higher after 15 min of irrigation compared with the total intravenous anaesthesia group. Although the clinical significance of this difference was not clear, these changes should be considered in certain patient groups.

Keywords

ANAESTHETICS, INHALATION, sevofluraneANAESTHETICS, INTRAVENOUS, propofolHORMONESaldosterone, corticotrophin, reninUROLOGICAL SURGICAL PROCEDURES, URINARY DIVERSION, nephrostomy, percutaneous
Type
Original Article
Information
European Journal of Anaesthesiology , Volume 20 , Issue 8 , September 2003 , pp. 653 - 657
Copyright
2003 European Society of Anaesthesiology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Spirnak PJ, Resnick IM. Percutaneous management In: Resnick MI, Pak CYC, eds. Urolithiasis: A Medical and Surgical Reference.Philadelphia, USA: W. B. Saunders, 1990: 279–318.
Sugai K, Sugai Y, Azuma Y, Tanaka Y Miyazaki M. Vascular absorption of irrigation solution in percutaneous nephro-ureterolithotomy. Br J Anaesth 1988; 61: 516–517.Google Scholar
Cortellini P, Frattini A, Ferretti S, Larosa M. Major complications of percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL). Analysis of our cases. Minerva Urol Nefrol 1997; 49: 203–206.Google Scholar
Cariou G, Le Duc A, Serrie A, Cortesse A, Teillac P Ziegler F. Reabsorption of the irrigation solute during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Ann Urol 1985; 19: 83–86.Google Scholar
Smith I, Nathanson M, White PF. Sevoflurane – a long-awaited volatile anaesthetic. Br J Anaesth 1996; 76: 435–445.Google Scholar
Bryson HM, Fulton BR, Faulds D. Propofol, an update of its use in anaesthesia and conscious sedation. Drugs 1995; 50: 513–559.Google Scholar
Kirvela M, Olkkola KT, Rosenberg PH, Yli-Hankala A, Salmela K, Lindgren L. Pharmacokinetics of propofol and haemodynamic changes during induction of anaesthesia in uraemic patients. Br J Anaesth 1992; 68: 178–182.Google Scholar
Nathan N, Debord J, Narcisse F, et al. Pharmacokinetics of propofol and its conjugates after continuous infusion in normal and in renal failure patients: a preliminary study. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg 1993; 44: 77–85.Google Scholar
Ebert TJ, Harkin CP, Muzi M. Cardiovascular responses to sevoflurane: a review. Anesth Analg 1995; 81: 11–22.Google Scholar
Frink EJ Jr, Malan TP Jr, Isner RJ, Brown EA, Morgan SE, Brown BR Jr. Renal concentrating function with prolonged sevoflurane or enflurane anesthesia in volunteers. Anesthesiology 1994: 80: 1019–1025.Google Scholar
Matsumura C, Kemmotsu O, Kawano Y, Takita K, Sugimoto H, Mayumi T. Serum and urine inorganic fluoride levels following prolonged low-dose sevoflurane anesthesia combined with epidural block. J Clin Anesth 1994; 6: 419–424.Google Scholar
Clayman RV, McDougall EM, Nakada SY. Access: percutaneous nephrostomy. In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan D, Wein JA, eds. Campbell's Urology, 7th edn. Philadelphia, USA: W. B. Saunders, 1998: 2791–2800.
Atici S, Zeren S, Aribogan A. Hormonal and hemodynamic changes during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Int Urol Nephrol 2001; 32: 311–314.Google Scholar
Deutschman CS, Harris AP, Fleisher LA. Changes in heart rate variability under propofol anesthesia: A possible explanation for propofol-induced bradycardia. Anesth Analg 1994; 79: 373–377.Google Scholar
Lindgren L, Yli-Hankala A, Randell T, Kirvela M, Scheinin M, Neuvonen PJ. Haemodynamic and catecholamine responses to induction of anaesthesia and tracheal intubation: comparison between propofol and thiopentone. Br J Anaesth 1993; 70: 306–310.Google Scholar
Ozkan S, Gokben M, Usyilmaz S, et al. The comparison of haemodynamic and neuroendocrine responses during total intravenous anaesthesia and sevoflurane anaesthesia. J Turk Anaesth Rean Soc 1999; 27: 449–453.Google Scholar
Hug CC Jr, McLeskey CH, Nahrwold ML, et al. Hemodynamic effects of propofol: data from over 25,000 patients. Anesth Analg 1993, 77 (Suppl. 4): S21–29.Google Scholar
Ebert TJ, Muzi M, Berens R, Golf D, Kampine J. Sympathetic responses to induction of anesthesia in humans with propofol or etomidate. Anesthesiology 1992; 76: 725–733.Google Scholar
Peterson GN, Krieger JN, Glauber DT. Anaesthetic experience with percutaneous lithotripsy. A review of potential and actual complications. Anaesthesia 1985; 40: 460–464.Google Scholar
Hopf HB, Arand D, Peters J. Sympathetic blockade by thoracic epidural anaesthesia suppresses renin release in response to hypotension, but activates the vasopressin system. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1992; 9: 63–69.Google Scholar
Seitz W, Luebbe N, Bechstein W, Fritz K, Kirchner E. A comparison of two types of anaesthesia on the endocrine and metabolic responses to anaesthesia and surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1986; 3: 283–294.Google Scholar
Kataja J, Viinamaki O, Punnonen R, Kaukinen S. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and plasma vasopressin in surgical patients anaesthetized with halothane or isoflurane. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1988; 5: 121–129.Google Scholar