Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:46:17.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison between lecture-based approach and case/problem-based learning discussion for teaching pre-anaesthetic assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2007

E. Carrero ,
C. Gomar ,
W. Penzo  and
M. Rull
E. Carrero*
Affiliation:
University of Barcelona, Hospital Clínic, Department of *Anaesthesiology, Barcelona, Spain
C. Gomar
Affiliation:
University of Barcelona, Hospital Clínic, Department of *Anaesthesiology, Barcelona, Spain
W. Penzo
Affiliation:
University of Barcelona, Hospital Clínic, Departments of †Clinical Psychology, Barcelona, Spain
M. Rull
Affiliation:
Hospital Universitari de Tarragona Joan XXIII, Department of Anaesthesiology, Tarragona, Spain
*
Correspondence to: Enrique Carrero, Department of Anaesthesiology, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain. E-mail: [email protected]; Tel: +34 93 2275558; Fax: +34 93 2275454
Get access

Summary

Background and objective

The case/problem-based learning discussion method was recently introduced into the theory-based training program for residents run by the Catalan Society of Anaesthesiology. This study was designed to assess and compare its effectiveness with that of the lecture-based approach for teaching pre-anaesthetic assessment, applying an objective tool for knowledge evaluation before and after teaching.

Methods

A prospective randomized study of two consecutive year groups of first year anaesthesiology residents was conducted. Twenty-nine residents attended a lecture, and 25, a case/problem-based learning discussion session. Their knowledge of pre-anaesthetic assessment was assessed before and after the teaching session with tests on four different clinical cases measuring six fields: (1) ‘recognizing clinical data with anaesthetic implications’; (2) ‘reasoning clinical data with anaesthetic implications’; (3) ‘ASA class’; (4) ‘Mallampati class’; (5) ‘choice of anaesthetic technique’; (6) ‘reasoning choice of anaesthetic technique’.

Results

Before the teaching session, the lecture group scored significantly higher on field 1 (P = 0.006). Both teaching methods improved scores on fields 1, 2 and 4. The case/problem group also improved on fields 3 and 6. After the teaching session, the field 1 score was still significantly higher in the lecture group (P = 0.005), and the field 3 score was significantly higher in the case/problem group (P = 0.044).

Conclusions

The effectiveness of lecture and case/problem-based learning discussion differed little in terms of improving participants’ immediate knowledge of ‘pre-anaesthetic assessment’.

Keywords

EDUCATIONRESEARCH DESIGNPROSPECTIVE STUDIESRANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALSMETHODSEDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT, knowledgeANAESTHESIAINTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCYTEACHING, lectures, problem-based learning
Type
Original Article
Information
European Journal of Anaesthesiology , Volume 24 , Issue 12 , December 2007 , pp. 1008 - 1015
Copyright
Copyright © European Society of Anaesthesiology 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Willenkin, RL. Lectures in anesthesia training [editorial]. Anesth Analg 1992; 74: 1–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Landers, DF, Becker, GL, Newland, MC, Peters, KR. Lecture practices in United States anethesiology residencies. Anesth Analg 1992; 74: 112–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Barrows, H, Tambly, R, eds. Problem Based Learning. New York, USA: Springer, 1980.Google Scholar
4.Barrows, HS. A taxonomy of problem-based learning methods. Med Educ 1986; 20: 481–486.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Liu PL. 1996 Problem-based learning discussions program progress to new pinnacles. ASA Newsletter [serial online] 1996 July; 60(7): [3 screens]. Available from: URL: http://www.asahq.org/Newsletters/1996/07_96/Article10.htm.Google Scholar
6.Mallampati, SR. Clinical signs to predict difficult tracheal intubation (hypothesis). Can Anaesth Soc J 1983; 30: 316–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Wolters, U, Wolf, T, Stützer, H, Schröder, T. ASA classification and perioperative variables as predictors of postoperative outcome. Br J Anaesth 1996; 77: 217–222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Colliver, JA. Educational theory and medical education practice: a cautionary note for medical school faculty. Acad Med 2002; 77: 1217–1220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Smits, PB, de Buisonje, CD, Verbeek, JH, van Dijk, FJ, Metz, JC, ten Cate, OJ. Problem-based learning versus lecture-based learning in postgraduate medical education. Scand J Work Environ Health 2003; 29: 280–287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Karaalp, A, Akici, A, Kocabasoglu, YE, Oktay, S. What do graduates think about a two-week rational pharmacotherapy course in the fifth year of medical education? Med Teach 2003; 25: 515–521.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Lohse, B, Nitzke, S, Ney, DM. Introducing a problem-based unit into a lifespan nutrition class using a randomized design produces equivocal outcomes. J Am Diet Assoc 2003; 103: 1020–1025.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Dugdale, A. Traditional medical education and the new path – they are not mutually exclusive. Med Educ 2001; 35: 304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Stehr, SN, Muller, M, Frank, MD et al. . Teaching methods in anesthesia and intensive care medicine. The new legislation and its possibilities for the specialty. Anaesthesist 2005; 54: 385–393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Rodrigues de Oliveira, G, Schonhorst, L. Problem-based learning implementation in an intensive course of anaesthesiology: a preliminary report on residents’ cognitive performance and percepcions of the educational environment. Med Teach 2005; 27: 382–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Chang, CH, Yang, CY, See, LC, Lui, PW. High satisfaction with problem-based learning for anaesthesia. Chang Gung Med J 2004; 27: 654–662.Google Scholar
16.Rodrigues de Oliveira, G, Schonhorst, L. The development and application of an instrument for assessing resident competence during preanesthesia consultation. Anesth Analg 2004; 99: 62–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Whitcomb, ME. More on competency-based education. Acad Med 2004; 79: 493–494.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Norman, GR, Schmidt, HG. Effectiveness of problem-based learning curricula: theory, practice and paper darts. Med Educ 2000; 34: 721–728.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Draper SW. The Hawthorne effect and other expectancy effects: a note [www document] 2005 March [15 screens]. Available from: URL: http://www.psy.gla.ac.uk/~steve/hawth.html.Google Scholar
20.Feeley, TW. The anesthesiologist as perioperative physician, new challenges, new roles. In: Schwartz, J, Matjasko, J, Otto, Ch, eds. ASA Refresher Courses in Anesthesiology. Orlando, USA: Lippincott-Raven Publishers, 1998; 224: 1–7.Google Scholar