Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T08:19:14.653Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparing different methods of cardiac output determination: a call for consensus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2006

B. Bein ,
J. Renner ,
J. Scholz  and
P. H. Tonner
B. Bein
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany
J. Renner
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany
J. Scholz
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany
P. H. Tonner
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Correspondence
Information
European Journal of Anaesthesiology , Volume 23 , Issue 8 , August 2006 , pp. 710
Copyright
© 2006 European Society of Anaesthesiology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bajorat J, Hofmockel R, Vagts DA et al. Comparison of invasive and less-invasive techniques of cardiac output measurement under different haemodynamic conditions in a pig model. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2006; 23: 23–30.Google Scholar
Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307–310.Google Scholar
Critchley JA. A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J Clin Monit 1999; 15: 85–91.Google Scholar
Linton NW, Linton RA. Is comparison of changes in cardiac output, assessed by different methods, better than only comparing cardiac output to the reference method? Br J Anaesth 2002; 89: 336–337.Google Scholar