Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T05:20:16.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Subjective assessment of depth of anaesthesia by experienced and inexperienced anaesthetists

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2006

D. Hadzidiakos
Affiliation:
Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Anaesthesiology, Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany
A. Nowak
Affiliation:
Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Anaesthesiology, Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany
N. Laudahn
Affiliation:
Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Anaesthesiology, Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany
J. Baars
Affiliation:
Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Anaesthesiology, Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany
K. Herold
Affiliation:
Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Anaesthesiology, Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany
B. Rehberg
Affiliation:
Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Anaesthesiology, Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany
Get access

Extract

Summary

Background and objective: To measure ‘depth of anaesthesia’, anaesthesiologists use a combination of observable end-points such as immobility and autonomic stability. Unconsciousness and amnesia are not reliably observable end-points, but correlate with parameters derived from the electroencephalogram. We investigated the association of subjective assessment and electroencephalographic measures of anaesthetic depth in a group of experienced (>4 yr of experience) and a group of inexperienced (<2 yr of experience) anaesthesiologists. Methods: One hundred ASA I or II patients were assigned to either group. Anaesthesiologists assessed ‘anaesthetic depth’ using an 11-point numeric and a 5-point verbal scale. Bispectral index and spectral entropy were recorded as electroencephalogram parameters. The association between the subjective assessment and the electroencephalogram parameters was calculated using the prediction probability, PK. Results: Association between subjective assessment and electroencephalographic parameters showed a tendency to a better prediction probability in the experienced group. The difference was significant (P < 0.05) for the bispectral index (PK 0.76 ± 0.01 for experienced and 0.71 ± 0.01 for inexperienced anaesthesiologists). In both groups, a large percentage of the data points recorded during surgery showed bispectral index values above the recommended value of 60 (13.2% in the experienced and 34.3% in the inexperienced group) despite a subjective assessment of ‘deep’ or ‘very deep’ anaesthetic depth. Conclusion: The study demonstrates that the association between subjectively assigned values of anaesthetic depth and electroencephalographic parameters of anaesthetic depth is better for anaesthesiologists with more clinical experience. However, in the ‘inexperienced’ as well as ‘experienced’ group a high percentage of bispectral index and entropy values above 60 occurred despite a subjective assessment of adequate anaesthetic depth. Although there was no evidence for explicit memory, this may indicate a risk for memory formation.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© 2006 European Society of Anaesthesiology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cullen DJ, Eger EI, Stevens WC et al. Clinical signs of anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1972; 36: 2136.Google Scholar
Eger EI, Saidman LJ, Brandstater B. Minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration: a standard of anesthetic potency. Anesthesiology 1965; 26: 756763.Google Scholar
Antognini JF, Schwartz K. Exaggerated anesthetic requirements in the preferentially anesthetized brain. Anesthesiology 1993; 79: 12441249.Google Scholar
Rampil IJ, Mason P, Singh H. Anesthetic potency (MAC) is independent of forebrain structures in the rat. Anesthesiology 1993; 78: 707712.Google Scholar
Evans JM. Pain and awareness during general anaesthesia. Lancet 1987; 330: 1033.Google Scholar
Schwender D, Daunderer M, Klasing S, Mulzer S, Finsterer U, Peter K. Monitoring intraoperative awareness. Vegetative signs, isolated forearm technique, electroencephalogram, and acute evoked potentials. Anaesthesist 1996; 45: 708721.Google Scholar
Tunstall ME. Detecting wakefulness during general anaesthesia for caesarean section. BMJ 1977; 1: 1321.Google Scholar
Heier T, Steen PA. Assessment of anaesthesia depth. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1996; 40: 10871100.Google Scholar
Leslie K, Sessler DI, Smith WD et al. Prediction of movement during propofol/nitrous oxide anesthesia. Performance of concentration, electroencephalographic, pupillary, and hemodynamic indicators. Anesthesiology 1996; 84: 5263.Google Scholar
Struys M, Versichelen L, Byttebier G, Mortier E, Moerman A, Rolly G. Clinical usefulness of the bispectral index for titrating propofol target effect-site concentration. Anaesthesia 1998; 53: 412.Google Scholar
Myles PS, Leslie K, McNeil J, Forbes A, Chan MT. Bispectral index monitoring to prevent awareness during anaesthesia: the B-Aware randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004; 363: 17571763.Google Scholar
Myles PS, Symons JA, Leslie K. Anaesthetists' attitudes towards awareness and depth-of-anaesthesia monitoring. Anaesthesia 2003; 58: 1116.Google Scholar
Smith WD, Dutton RC, Smith NT. Measuring the performance of anesthetic depth indicators. Anesthesiology 1996; 84: 3851.Google Scholar
Kelley SD. Monitoring level of consciousness during anesthesia & sedation. A Clinician's Guide to the Bispectral Index. Newton, MA, USA: Aspect Medical Systems, 2003.
Eger EI. What is general anesthetic action? Anesth Analg 1993; 77: 408409.Google Scholar
Konrad C, Schupfer G, Wietlisbach M, Gerber H. Learning manual skills in anesthesiology: is there a recommended number of cases for anesthetic procedures? Anesth Analg 1998; 86: 635639.Google Scholar
Prys-Roberts C. Anaesthesia: a practical or impractical construct? Br J Anaesth 1987; 59: 13411345.Google Scholar
Todd MM. EEGs, EEG processing and the bispectral index1. Anesthesiology 1998; 89: 815817.Google Scholar
Viertio-Oja H, Maja V, Sarkela M et al. Description of the Entropy algorithm as applied in the Datex-Ohmeda S/5 Entropy Module. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2004; 48: 154161.Google Scholar
Jensen EW, Litvan H, Struys M, Martinez VP. Pitfalls and challenges when assessing the depth of hypnosis during general anaesthesia by clinical signs and electronic indices. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2004; 48: 12601267.Google Scholar
Kerssens C, Klein J, van der WA, Bonke B. Auditory information processing during adequate propofol anesthesia monitored by electroencephalogram bispectral index. Anesth Analg 2001; 92: 12101214.Google Scholar
Liu J, Singh H, White PF. Electroencephalographic bispectral index correlates with intraoperative recall and depth of propofol-induced sedation. Anesth Analg 1997; 84: 185189.Google Scholar
Deeprose C, Andrade J, Varma S, Edwards N. Unconscious learning during surgery with propofol anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2004; 92: 171177.Google Scholar
Deeprose C, Andrade J, Harrison D, Edwards N. Unconscious auditory priming during surgery with propofol and nitrous oxide anaesthesia: a replication. Br J Anaesth 2005; 94: 5762.Google Scholar
Lubke GH, Kerssens C, Phaf H, Sebel PS. Dependence of explicit and implicit memory on hypnotic state in trauma patients. Anesthesiology 1999; 90: 670680.Google Scholar
Ellerkmann RK, Liermann VM, Alves TM et al. Spectral entropy and bispectral index as measures of the electroencephalographic effects of sevoflurane. Anesthesiology 2004; 101: 12751282.Google Scholar
Schmidt GN, Bischoff P, Standl T, Hellstern A, Teuber O, Schulte EJ. Comparative evaluation of the Datex-Ohmeda S/5 Entropy Module and the bispectral index monitor during propofol–remifentanil anesthesia. Anesthesiology 2004; 101: 12831290.Google Scholar
Tiren C, Anderson RE, Barr G, Owall A, Jakobsson JG. Clinical comparison of three different anaesthetic depth monitors during cardiopulmonary bypass. Anaesthesia 2005; 60: 189193.Google Scholar
Vakkuri A, Yli-Hankala A, Talja P et al. Time-frequency balanced spectral entropy as a measure of anesthetic drug effect in central nervous system during sevoflurane, propofol, and thiopental anesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2004; 48: 145153.Google Scholar
Vanluchene AL, Vereecke H, Thas O, Mortier EP, Shafer SL, Struys MM. Spectral entropy as an electroencephalographic measure of anesthetic drug effect: a comparison with bispectral index and processed midlatency auditory evoked response. Anesthesiology 2004; 101: 3442.Google Scholar
Vanluchene AL, Struys MM, Heyse BE, Mortier EP. Spectral entropy measurement of patient responsiveness during propofol and remifentanil. A comparison with the bispectral index. Br J Anaesth 2004; 93: 645654.Google Scholar
Rehberg B, Bouillon T, Gruenewald M et al. Comparison of the concentration-dependent effect of sevoflurane on the spinal H-reflex and the EEG in humans. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2004; 48: 569576.Google Scholar
Sandin RH, Enlund G, Samuelsson P, Lennmarken C. Awareness during anaesthesia: a prospective case study. Lancet 2000; 355: 707711.Google Scholar
Kissin I. Depth of anesthesia and bispectral index monitoring. Anesth Analg 2000; 90: 11141117.Google Scholar
Schnider TW, Shafer SL. Evolving clinically useful predictors of recovery from intravenous anesthetics. Anesthesiology 1995; 83: 902905.Google Scholar
Breslin DS, Mirakhur RK, Reid JE, Kyle A. Manual versus target-controlled infusions of propofol. Anaesthesia 2004; 59: 10591063.Google Scholar
Passot S, Servin F, Allary R et al. Target-controlled versus manually-controlled infusion of propofol for direct laryngoscopy and bronchoscopy. Anesth Analg 2002; 94: 12121216.Google Scholar
Lequeux PY, Cantraine F, Levarlet M, Barvais L. Absence of explicit and implicit memory in unconscious patients using a TCI of propofol. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2003; 47: 833837.Google Scholar
Glass PS, Bloom M, Kearse L, Rosow C, Sebel P, Manberg P. Bispectral analysis measures sedation and memory effects of propofol, midazolam, isoflurane, and alfentanil in healthy volunteers. Anesthesiology 1997; 86: 836847.Google Scholar