Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T07:51:39.500Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reply

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2006

C. Baillard
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Avicenne Hospital, APHP University of Paris 13, EA 3409, Bobigny, France
C.-M. Samama
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Avicenne Hospital, APHP University of Paris 13, EA 3409, Bobigny, France
Get access

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Correspondence
Copyright
© 2006 European Society of Anaesthesiology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Maktabi MA, Smith RB, Todd MM. Is routine endotracheal intubation as safe as we think or wish? Anesthesiology 2003; 99: 247248.Google Scholar
Woods AW, Allam S. Tracheal intubation without the use of neuromuscular blocking agents. Br J Anaesth 2005; 94: 150158.Google Scholar
Baillard C, Adnet F, Borron SW et al. Tracheal intubation in routine practice with and without muscular relaxation: an observational study. Eur J Anaesth 2005; 22: 672677.Google Scholar
Eriksson LI. Evidence-based practice and neuromuscular monitoring. Anesthesiology 2003; 98: 10371039.Google Scholar
Stout DM, Bishop MJ, Dwersteg JF, Cullen BF. Correlation of endotracheal tube size with sore throat and hoarseness following general anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1987; 67: 419421.Google Scholar
Mulcaster JT, Mills J, Hung OR et al. Laryngoscopic intubation: learning and performance. Anesthesiology 2003; 98: 2327.Google Scholar