Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T23:42:43.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The influence of fentanyl vs. s-ketamine on intubating conditions during induction of anaesthesia with etomidate and rocuronium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 August 2006

T. Ledowski
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hospital of the Christian-Albrechts-University, Schwanenweg 21, D24105 Kiel, Germany
H. Wulf
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hospital of the Philipps-University, Baldingerstraße, D35033 Marburg, Germany
Get access

Abstract

Background and objective In the present study, we investigated the combination of etomidate and s-ketamine with regard to its suitability for modified rapid-sequence induction using rocuronium for muscle relaxation.

Methods In a prospective, randomized and double-blinded study, 90 patients were assigned to one of three groups for induction of anaesthesia in combination with etomidate (0.3 mg kg−1) and muscle relaxation with rocuronium (0.6 mg kg−1). The groups were as follows: (a) control, i.e. placebo; (b) fentanyl, fentanyl (1.5 μg kg−1); (c) ketamine, s-ketamine (0.5 mg kg−1). Tracheal-intubating conditions after 1 min were classified as excellent, good or poor. During the induction of anaesthesia, arterial pressure and heart rate were measured every 60 s.

Results Intubating conditions were best using etomidate and s-ketamine (23 excellent, 7 good, 0 poor) compared with the control (8, 16, 6 respectively) and fentanyl groups (7, 21, 2 respectively) (P < 0.01). While heart rate and arterial pressure remained stable in the control and fentanyl groups during induction, both significantly increased in the ketamine group (P < 0.01).

Conclusions The combination of etomidate and s-ketamine for anaesthesia induction produces mostly excellent intubating conditions after 60 s using only 0.6 mg kg−1 of rocuronium. This combination of drugs may be a useful alternative, if succinylcholine needs to be avoided, for modified rapid-sequence induction.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
2001 European Society of Anaesthesiology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)