Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T06:58:45.385Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of face masks in the bag-mask ventilation of a manikin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2006

D. Redfern ,
S. Rassam ,
M. R. Stacey  and
J. S. Mecklenburgh
D. Redfern
Affiliation:
University Hospital of Wales, Department of Anaesthetics and Intensive Care Medicine, Cardiff, UK
S. Rassam
Affiliation:
University Hospital of Wales, Department of Anaesthetics and Intensive Care Medicine, Cardiff, UK
M. R. Stacey
Affiliation:
University Hospital of Wales, Department of Anaesthetics and Intensive Care Medicine, Cardiff, UK
J. S. Mecklenburgh
Affiliation:
University of Wales College of Medicine, Department of Anaesthetics and Intensive Care Medicine, Cardiff, UK
Get access

Extract

Summary

Background and objective: We conducted a study investigating the effectiveness of four face mask designs in the bag-mask ventilation of a special manikin adapted to simulate a difficult airway. Methods: Forty-eight anaesthetists volunteered to bag-mask ventilate the manikin for 3 min with four different face masks. The primary outcome of the study was to calculate mean percentage leak from the face masks over 3 min. Anaesthetists were also asked to rate the face masks using a visual analogue score. Results: The single-use scented intersurgical face mask had the lowest mean leak (20%). This was significantly lower than the mean leak from the single-use, cushioned 7000 series Air Safety Ltd. face mask (24%) and the reusable silicone Laerdal face mask (27%) but not significantly lower than the mean leak from the reusable anatomical intersurgical face mask (23%). Conclusions: There was a large variation in both performance and satisfaction between anaesthetists with each design. This highlights the importance of having a variety of face masks available for emergency use.

Keywords

ANAESTHESIA, equipment, techniquesEQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES, face masksRESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL, bag-mask ventilation
Type
Original Article
Information
European Journal of Anaesthesiology , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , February 2006 , pp. 169 - 172
Copyright
© 2006 European Society of Anaesthesiology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Presented in part at the AAGBI Annual Congress Meeting, 21–24 September 2004, Cardiff, UK.

References

Cooper GM. Is the art of airway management being lost? Roy Coll Anaesth (UK) Bull 2002; 14: 662–663.Google Scholar
Stewart RD, Kaplan R, Pennock B, Thompson F. Influence of mask design on bag-mask ventilation. Ann Emerg Med 1985; 14: 403–406.Google Scholar
Finer NN, Rich W, Craft A, Henderson C. Comparison of methods of bag and mask ventilation for neonatal resuscitation. Resuscitation 2001; 49: 299–305.Google Scholar
Devitt JH, Brookes DA, Oakley PA, Webster PM. Mask lung ventilation by ambulance personnel: a performance assessment. Can J Anaesth 1994; 41: 872–873.Google Scholar
Osterwalder JJ, Schuhwerk W. Effectiveness of mask ventilation in a training manikin. A comparison between the Oxylator EM100 and the bag-valve device. Resuscitation 1998; 36: 23–27.Google Scholar
Stacey MRW, Doherty J, Mecklenburgh JS. Basic airway model (poster presentation). World Congress of Anaesthesiologists 2004, Paris.
Blunt MC, Burchett KR. Variant Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease and disposable anaesthetic equipment – balancing the risks. Br J Anaesth 2003; 90: 1–3.Google Scholar
Schaefer JJ. Simulators and difficult airway management. Paediatr Anaesth 2004; 14: 28–37.Google Scholar
Stringer KR, Bajenor S, Yentis SM. Training in airway management. Anaesthesia 2002; 57: 967–983.Google Scholar
Mason RA. Education and training in airway management. Br J Anaesth 1998; 81: 305–307.Google Scholar