Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 February 2009
This paper analyses the monitoring under competition law of the formation and operation of company groups in Poland. Groups of undertakings, which existed in the centrally planned economy, have been eliminated, or have radically, changed the range of their operations. Reasons for the formation of company groups include: risk management on the emerging market, the creation of common investment funds under the restrictive monetary policy, reduced transaction costs, and the delegation of powers to subsidiaries. The groups operating currently were incorporated through agreements between companies, buy-outs of state enterprises by private investors, acquisitions and outsourcing. The distribution networks form the majority of the agreement-based groups. Sectoral diversification is a characteristic feature of the capital groups and in most cases they are vertically integrated. Polish competition law enables the supervision of agreements between undertakings, acquisitions and buy-outs by private investors. The application of the competition law resulted in the formation of multi-sectoral company groups. The market power of companies and their groups depends not only on their size but also on the size of their relevant markets. Liberalisation of international economic relations results in the elimination of barriers to entry on product and geographic markets, weakening the market power of the domestic market players and developing competition.
1 Józefiak, C., “Niepoprawne skłonnosci” (Incorrigible inclinations), Rzeczpospolita, 26.05.1997.Google Scholar
2 Monkiewicz, J., “Tworzenie i funkcjonowanie struktur holdingowych w okresie trans-formacji gospodarczej w Polsce” (Creation and activity of holdings in a process of economic transformation in Poland), in: Grupy kapitałowe w Polsce (Capital groups in Poland) (łWarsaw: Difin 1998) 194.Google Scholar
3 Solarz, Jan K., “Udział inwestorów strategicznych w grupach kapitałwych” (Participation of foreign investors in the capital groups), in: Grupy kapitałowe w PolsceGoogle Scholar, ibid., 117.
4 Romanowska, M., “Strategie grup kapitałowych w Polsce” (Strategies of Capital Groups in Poland), in: Grupy kapitałowe w PolsceGoogle Scholar, ibid., 229.
5 Ibid., 209-215; Konglomeraty na warszawskiej giełdzie (luty 1998) (Conglomerates on the Warsaw Stock Exchange) (Warsaw: Parkiet and Media & Invest 1998).
6 Mass Privatization Programme, Ministry of Privatization, Warsaw 1993; Thieme, J., “The Legal Structure of the National Investment Founds”, in: Privatization in Poland and East Germany: a Comparison, vol. 2 (Munich: Osteuropa-Institut München 1995) 265–289Google Scholar; Małecki, M., “Strategie inwestycyjne Narodowych Funduszy Inwestycyjnych” (Investment Strategies of the National Investment Founds), in: Emerging Capital Markets (Warsaw: Elipsa 1999) 131–136Google Scholar; Ada, Kostrz-Kostecka, Narodowe Fundusze Inwestycyjne na giełdzie (National Investment Founds on the Stock Exchange) (Warsaw: Presspublica 1997)Google Scholar; Wawrzyniak, B./Koładkiewicz, I./Solarz, J./Trocki, M., Narodowe fundusze inwestycyjne. Zarządzanie nową strukturą (National Investment Founds. Conduct of a new Structure) (Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN 1998).Google Scholar
7 M. Romanowska, supra n. 4, at pp. 221-223; Groszek, M., “Aktywność inwestycyjna polskich banków” (Investment Activity of the Polish Banks), in: Emerging Capital Markets (Warsaw: Elipsa 1999) pp. 117–131.Google Scholar
8 Konglomeraty na warszawskiej giełdzie, supra n. 5; M. Romanowska, supra n. 4, at pp. 215-219.
9 Gronowski, S., Polskie prawo antymonopolowe (The Polish Antimonopoly Law) (Warsaw: WZPP 1998) 246.Google Scholar
10 Council Regulation 4064/89 on Merger Control, OJ [1990] L 257/13.
11 Raporty UOKiK (Reports of the OCCP) (Warsaw 1995, 1996, 1997,1998,1999).
12 S. Gronowski, supra n. 9, at p. 199.