Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:04:34.723Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Flat Metallicity Profiles in Rotating Dwarf Galaxies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2011

J. Schroyen
Affiliation:
Sterrenkundig Observatorium, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281, S9, 9000 Gent, Belgium
S. De Rijcke
Affiliation:
Sterrenkundig Observatorium, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281, S9, 9000 Gent, Belgium
S. Valcke
Affiliation:
Sterrenkundig Observatorium, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281, S9, 9000 Gent, Belgium
Get access

Abstract

Dwarf irregulars (dIrr) and flat, rotating dwarf ellipticals (dE) generally posess flat metallicity profiles while round dEs show strong metallicity gradients (Koleva et al. 2009). Unlike dEs, dIrrs also exhibit ongoing star formation (SF) (Dolphin et al. 2005), in most cases compatible with a continuous star formation history (SFH). We show results based on a large suite of Nbody-SPH simulations of flat dwarf galaxies, both rotating and non-rotating, performed with a modified version of GADGET2. They have a range of masses, flattenings and rotations speeds and are based on the spherical models of (Valcke et al. 2008). Specifically, we want to see if it is possible to reproduce these characteristics in isolated DG models. These simulations show that using rotation to flatten a dwarf galaxy is particularly efficient in turning a so-called “breathing” SFH (Valcke et al. 2008) into a more continuous SFH, and in producing flat metallicity profiles. Non-rotating dEs in a flattened dark-matter halo are not able to reproduce these characteristics. Thus, it appears that rotation is key to reproducing the observed characteristics. Rotation causes a “centrifugal barrier” which slows down the infall of gas, so that the low-level star formation is not centrally concentrated but occurs galaxy-wide, and in this way also prevents large-scale oscillations in the SFR. This mechanism of smearing out the star formation in time and space proves to be the principal reason for the flat metallicity profiles, instead of the often referred to “fountain mechanism” (De Young & Heckman 1994; Barazza & Binggeli 2002; Mac Low & Ferrara 1999; Ferrara & Tolstoy 2000). We therefore propose a “centrifugal barrier mechanism” which is able to explain the observations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© EAS, EDP Sciences, 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Koleva, M., de Rijcke, S., Prugniel, P., Zeilinger, W.W., & Michielsen, D., 2009, MNRAS, 396, 2133CrossRef
Dolphin, A.E., Weisz, D.R., Skillman, E.D., & Holtzman, J.A., 2005 [ arXiv:astro-ph/0506430]
Valcke, S., de Rijcke, S., & Dejonghe, H., 2008, MNRAS, 389, 1111CrossRef
De Young, D.S., & Heckman, T.M., 1994, ApJ, 431, 598CrossRef
Barazza, F.D., & Binggeli, B., 2002, A&A, 394, L15
Mac Low, M.-M., & Ferrara, A., 1999, ApJ, 513, 142CrossRef
Ferrara, A., & Tolstoy, E., 2000, MNRAS, 313, 291CrossRef