Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T15:43:40.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Use and Abuse of “Holy War”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2012

Khaled Abou El Fadl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Essays
Information
Ethics & International Affairs , Volume 14 , March 2000 , pp. 133 - 140
Copyright
Copyright © Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 El Fadl, Khaled Abou, “Islamic Law and Muslim Minorities: The Juristic Discourse on Muslim Minorities from the Second/Eighth to the Eleventh/Seventeenth Centuries,” Islamic Law and Society 1 (1994), p. 161Google Scholar.

2 See ibid., pp. 157–61Google Scholar.

3 El Fadl, Khaled Abou, “The Rules of Killing at War: An Inquiry into Classical Sources,” The Muslim World 59 (1999), p. 150Google Scholar.

4 Several contemporary Muslim scholars have argued that offensive jihad is fundamentally inconsistent with Islamic morality. See Zahra, Muhammad Abu, “Nazariyat al-Harb fi al-Islam,” Revue egyptienne du droit Int'l, 14:1Google Scholar; Shaltut, Mahmud, al-Islam wa al-'Ilaqat al-Dawliya (Cairo: Al-Majlis al-A'la lil-Su'un al-Islamiyah, 1951), p. 38Google Scholar; Mahmassani, Sobhi, “The Principles of International Law in the Light of Islamic Doctrine,” in Recueil Des Cours (Hague: Academic de droit international, 1966Google Scholar), Tome 117: 201–328; Qureshi, M. M., Landmarks of Jihad (Lahor: Sh. Muahammad Ashraf, 1971), pp. 4–8Google Scholar; and Osman, Fathi, Sharia in Contemporary Society: The Dynamic of Change in Islamic Law (Los Angeles: Multimedia Vera International, 1994), p. 62Google Scholar.

5 There are some secondary sources that Johnson apparently did not use that could have been quite informative. For instance, Hamidullah, Muhammad, The Muslim Conduct of State (Lahore: Sh. Muhammad Ashraf, 1977Google Scholar); and Mahmassani, “Principles of International Law in the Light of Islamic Doctrine.”

6 See El Fadl, Abou, “Rules of Killing at War,” pp. 144–49Google Scholar.

7 Ibid., pp. 151–55Google Scholar.