Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T18:16:35.715Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

There's No Deterring the Catholic Bishops

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2012

J. Bryan Hehir
J. Bryan Hehir
Affiliation:
J. BRYAN HEHIR is the Joseph Kennedy Professor of Christian Ethics at Georgetown University, and is the Counselor for Social Policy of the U.S. Catholic Conference.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article uses two episcopal texts published by the National Conference of Catholic Bishops during the 1980s as a case study of the role of ethics in the foreign policy process. No longer a topic for theologians, philosophers, and lawyers alone, as in past decades, the morality of foreign affairs is now a matter of public discourse and political strategy. The size and social diversity of the Catholic church, the convergence of its stands on anti-communism and anti-nuclear weaponry, and the cosmic nature of the nuclear threat allowed the bishops to make transnational references reaching into all corners of the globe. The church-state exchange introduced the ethics of consequences and promoted moral debate about strategic foreign policy and deterrence.

Type
Articles
Information
Ethics & International Affairs , Volume 3 , March 1989 , pp. 277 - 296
Copyright
© Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 National Conference of Bishops, Catholic, The Challenge of Peace: God's Promise and Our Response (Washington, D.C: U.S. Catholic Conference, 1983)Google Scholar.

2 National Conference of Bishops, Catholic, Building Peace and A Report on The Challenge of Peace and Policy Developments 1983–1988 (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Catholic Conference, 1988)Google Scholar.

3 The single best guide to the commentaries is the section on “Notes on Moral Theology” in Theological Studies, Vol. 45 (1984) pp. 122–138; Vol. 46 (1985) pp. 80–101; Vol. 47 (1986) pp. 117–133Google Scholar.

4 Hoffmann, Stanley, The Political Ethics of International Relations (New York: Carnegie Council on Ethics and International Affairs, 1988) p. 3Google Scholar.

3 Walzer, Michael, Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations (New York: Basic Books, 1977) pp. xi–xiiGoogle Scholar.

6 Osgood, Robert and Tucker, Robert, Force, Order and Justice, (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1967)Google Scholar.

7 Ramsey, Paul, “The Just War: Force and Political Responsibility,” (New York: Scribner, 1968)Google Scholar.

8 Tucker, Robert W., “The Nuclear Debate,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 63 (1984) p. 31CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 A survey of Catholic views is found in Gallup, G. Jr., and Castelli, J., The American Catholic People: Their Beliefs, Practices and Values (Garden City: Doubleday and Co., 1987) pp. 77–90Google Scholar.

10 Reston, James, “Church, State and the Bomb,” The New York Times, October 27, 1982, p. A27Google Scholar.

11 Murray, John Courtney, We Hold These Truths: Catholic Reflections on the American Proposition (New York: Sheed and Ward, 1960) p. 291Google Scholar.

12 IIPaul, John, “Address to Scientists and Scholars,” Origins, Vol. 10 (1981) p. 621Google Scholar.

13 For texts of the German and French letters compare: Schall, J. V., ed., Out of Justice, Peace: Joint Pastoral Letter of the West German Bishops and Winning the Peace: Joint Pastoral Letter of the French Bishops (San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1984)Google Scholar.

14 Letter of Mr. William P. Clark, National Security Adviser to the President, to Cardinal Joseph L. Bernardin, Chairman of the ad-hoc Committee on War and Peace (January 15, 1983) p. 1Google Scholar.

15 Weinberger, Casper W., Annual Report to the Congress on the FY 1984 Budget, FY 1985 Authorization Request and FY 1984–88 Defense Programs; February 1, 1983 (Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1983) pp. 55Google Scholar.

16 IbidGoogle Scholar.

17 Letter of Mr. William Clark, op. cit., p. 1Google Scholar.

18 The Challenge of Peace, op. cit., p. 78Google Scholar.

19 Letter of Mr. William Clark, op. at., p. 2Google Scholar.

20 The Challenge of Peace, op. cit., p. 79Google Scholar.

21 Ibid., p. 79Google Scholar.

22 Bundy, McGeorge, “The Bishops and the Bomb,” New York Review of Books (June 16, 1983) p. 4Google Scholar.

23 Wohlstetter, Albert, “Bishops, Statesmen and Other Strategists on the Bombing of Innocents,” Commentary (June 1983) pp. 15–35Google Scholar; Discriminate Deterrence: Report of the Commission on Integrated Long-Term Strategy, (Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1988)Google Scholar.

24 Grisez, Germain, “Radical Thoughts on Nuclear Deterrence” (unpublished); compare also “The Moral Implications of a Nuclear Deterrent.”Center Journal, Vol. 2 (1982) pp. 9–24. John Finnis, “Nuclear Deterrence, Christian Conscience and the End of Christendom,”New Oxford Review, Vol. 55 (July-August 1988) pp. 6–16Google Scholar.

25 Brien, William O', “Just War Doctrine in a Nuclear Context,” Theological Studies, Vol. 44 (1983) pp. 191–220Google Scholar; Nye, Joseph S. Jr., Nuclear Ethics (New York: The Free Press, 1986)Google Scholar.

26 Talbott, Strobe, The Master of the Game: Paul Nitze and the Nuclear Peace (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1988) p. 192Google Scholar; Payne, Keith, Strategic Defense: Star Wars in Perspective (Lanham, MD: Hamilton Press, 1986)Google Scholar.

27 Wieseltier, Leon, Nuclear War, Nuclear Peace (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1983) p. xiGoogle Scholar.

28 Rosenfeld, Stephen S., “The Bishops and the Bomb,” The Washington Post, October 29, 1982Google Scholar.

29 Building Peace and A Report on The Challenge of Peace and Policy Developments 1983–1988, op. citGoogle Scholar.

30 The literature on SDI is voluminous; for a sampling compare: Group, Aspen Strategy, The Strategic Defense Initiative and American Security (Lanham, MD: University of America Press, 1987)Google Scholar; Brzezinski, Z., ed., Promise or Peril: The Strategic Defense Initiative (Washington, D.C.: Ethics and Public Policy Center, 1986)Google Scholar; Carter, Ashton and Schwartz, David N., eds., Ballistic Missile Defense (Washington; D.C.: The Brookings Institution, 1984)Google Scholar.

31 Nuclear Ethics, op. cit., pp. 14–26Google Scholar.

32 Building Peace and A Report on the Challenge of Peace and Policy Developments 1983—1988, op. cit., p. 72Google Scholar.