No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 September 2012
Introduced by a few small religious liberal-arts colleges in the 1940s, the reformist movement toward studying peace has recently gained momentum in larger academic auditoriums. The author cites prominent academicians currently examining this trend and presents the case for accepting grass-roots social activism as a crucial link to the closed world of policy-making elites. He places faith in individual thinkers to provide new insights and practical theories of peace studies in both national and international domains.
1 Katz, Neil H., “Conflict Resolution and Peace Studies,” The Annals, Vol. 504 (July 1989), p. 21Google Scholar.
2 Kohn, Walter and Badash, Laurence, “University Education for the Nuclear Age,” The Annals, Vol. 504 (July 1989), p. 23Google Scholar.
3 Weigert, Kathleen Maas, “Peace Studies as Education for Nonviolent Social Change,” The Annals, Vol. 504 (July 1989), p. 23Google Scholar.
4 Bing, Anthony G., “Peace Studies as Experimental Education,” The Annals, Vol. 504 (July 1989), p. 52Google Scholar.
5 Dugan, Marie A., “Peace Studies at the Graduate Level,” The Annah, Vol. 504 (July 1989), p. 76Google Scholar.
6 Hall, Barbara Welling, “Peace Studies as if Soviet Studies Mattered,” The Annals, Vol. 504 (July 1989), p. 108Google Scholar.
7 Ibid., p. 109.Google Scholar
8 Alger, Chadwick F., “Peace Studies: A Perspective from the Foundation World,” The Annals, Vol. 504 (July 1989), p. 93Google Scholar.
9 Ibid.Google Scholar
10 Benedict, Kennette, “Funding Peace Studies: A Perspective From the Foundation World,” The Annals, Vol. 504 (July 1989), p. 93Google Scholar.
11 Ibid., p. 94.Google Scholar
12 Boulding, Elise, “Introduction,” in Thomas, Daniel C. and Klare, Michael T., eds., Peace and World Order Studies, 5th ed. (Boulder: Westview Press, 1989), p. 7.Google Scholar