Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T18:51:18.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is Democracy an Ethical Standard?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2012

James Turner Johnson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article explores the Western cultural traditions of democracy and freedom which form a political ethic deeply rooted in the underlying philosophical and theological American heritage. Theories of Machiavelli, Montesqieu, and Niebuhr support the notion that the potential for virtue is found in all individuals, who, through their undeniable freedoms, responsibilities, and participation, have the capability to establish a political community based on democracy, justice, and respect for human rights. Virtue, justice, morality, ethics, freedom, and democracy are all necessary elements for establishing and maintaining the political community. Can history serve to uphold democracy as an ethical standard of governance? The author suggests that the basic and cross-temporal cornerstones of morality; the family and religion serve as “intermediate” social structures in attaining the central virtues of a moral democracy.

Type
Articles
Information
Ethics & International Affairs , Volume 4 , March 1990 , pp. 1 - 17
Copyright
Copyright © Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Transcript of President Bush's address on the decision to use force in Panama, The New York Times, December 21, 1989, p. A19Google Scholar.

2 Alighieri, Dante, “Monarchy (De Monarchia),” in Dante, Monarchy and Three Political Letters (New York: The Noonday Press, 1954), Book IGoogle Scholar.

3 Marsilius of Padua, “The Defender of Peace,” in Gewirth, Alan, Marsilius of Padua: The Defender of Peace, Volume II (New York: Columbia University Press, 1956)Google Scholar.

4 See Calvin, John, The Institutes of the Christian Religion, Book IV, Chapter XX; Martin Luther, Secular Authority and Against the Thievish, Murderous Hordes of PeasantsGoogle Scholar.

5 See Miller, Perry, The New England Mind: The Seventeenth Century (Boston: Beacon Press, 1954), Chapter XIVGoogle Scholar.

6 Erasmus, Desiderius, The Education of a Christian Prince (New York: Octagon Books, 1965)Google Scholar.

7 de Montesquieu, Baron, The Spirit of the Laws, Vol. I (New York: Haf'ner Publishing Company, 1949), p. 20Google Scholar.

8 On this development see Little, David, Religion, Order, and Law (New York: Harper & Row, 1969), Part IIGoogle Scholar.

9 Ethics may be conceived several ways. One of them is to concentrate on principles or standards and the rules for moral living that follow from them. This approach has the advantage of concentrating attention on the nature of the rules and the principles behind them, at the cost of paying attention to the moral life of the individual only as one who ought to follow (but may not follow) the rules. Another approach concentrates on the moral character of the individual, which is defined by the possession (or lack of possession) of moral virtue (or strength). The two conceptions are related in that commonly the development of virtue is regarded as the result of practices in accord with moral rules for living, until the virtues exist as habits of life. In this essay I use both the language of standards and that of virtue alternately, according to whether I wish to emphasize the goals held up to follow by the ideal of democracy or the sort of character on which democratic society depends and which it inculcates in its membersGoogle Scholar.

10 Compare Montesquieu on monarchical government and the lack of virtue it produces in its citizens; The Spirit of the Laws, Vol. I, pp. 23–24Google Scholar.

11 Sellers, James, Public Ethics (New York: Harper & Row, 1970), p. 269Google Scholar.

12 Ibid., p. 270Google Scholar.

13 Frye, Northrop, Anatomy of Criticism (New York: Atheneum, 1967)Google Scholar.

14 Walzer, Michael, “Nuclear Deterrence and Democratic Politics,” in O'Brien, William V. and John Langan, S. J., eds., The Nuclear Dilemma and the Just War Tradition (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1986), p. 209Google Scholar.

15 Ibid., pp. 210–11Google Scholar.

16 Ibid., pp. 215–18Google Scholar.

17 Novak, Michael, Free Persons and the Common Good (Lanham, MD: Madison Books, 1989), p. 164, n. 37Google Scholar.

18 Niebuhr, Reinhold, An Interpretation of Christian Ethics (New York: Meridian Books, 1956)Google Scholar.

19 Sellers, Compare, Public Ethics, pp. 278–80, and Novak, Free Persons and the Common Good, pp. 162–69Google Scholar.