Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:04:02.609Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Governing the Environment: Three Motivating Factors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 December 2015

Susan Park
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Governance arrangements have become increasingly complex over time, such that today everything from the Internet to medicine and warfare is subject to some form of governance at the global level. Notably, these changes in global governance can come slowly or quickly, depending on circumstances. For example, evolutionary change is evident in the establishment of new treaties and protocols on regulating the various aspects of war and its aftermath—an area where the list of agreements is long and growing. But change can also happen very quickly as new mechanisms—for example, for coordinating states’ responses during pandemics—are established during crises.

Type
Roundtable: Change and Continuity in Global Governance
Information
Ethics & International Affairs , Volume 29 , Issue 4 , Winter 2015 , pp. 433 - 442
Copyright
Copyright © Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1 Rodney Hall and Thomas J. Biersteker, eds., The Emergence of Private Authority in Global Governance (Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press, 2002).

2 Radoslav S. Dimitrov, Science and International Environmental Policy: Regimes and Nonregimes in Global Governance (Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield, 2006), p. 3.

3 UNEP website, Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, 1992, www.unep.org/Documents.multilingual/Default.asp?DocumentID=78&ArticleID=1163 (accessed September 1, 2015).

4 Dimitrov, Science and International Environmental Policy, p. 3.

5 United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), Global Environmental Outlook: Environment for Development (GEO- 4), 2007, available at www.unep.org/geo/geo4/report/GEO-4_Report_Full_en.pdf.

6 Data from Ronald B. Mitchell, 2002–2015. International Environmental Agreements Database Project (Version 2014.3), 2002–2015, at iea.uoregon.edu/; Doris Fuchs, Business Power in Global Governance (Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner, 2007).

7 Tsingou, Eleni “The Club Rules in Global Financial Governance,” Political Quarterly 85, no. 4 (2014), pp. 417–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Mark Blyth, Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century (Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press, 2002).

9 Tsingou, “The Club Rules,” p. 418.

10 Ibid., p. 419.

11 Margaret Keck and Kathryn Sikkink, Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1998).

12 Susan Park, World Bank Group Interactions with Environmentalists: Changing International Organization Identities (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2010).

13 Union of International Organizations, 2011, “Yearbook of International Organizations Statistics 2005/2006,” www.uia.org/statistics/organizations/types-2004.pdf (accessed December 8, 2011).

14 Website of the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, NGO Branch page, “Basic Facts about ECOSOC Status,” csonet.org/index.php?menu=17 (accessed December 1, 2011).

15 Pamela Chasek, David L. Downie, and Janet Welsh Brown, Global Environmental Politics, fourth edition (Boulder, Colo.: Westview, 2006), p. 74.

16 Susan Park, “Transnational Environmental Activism,” in Robert Faulkner, ed., Handbook of Global Climate and Environment Policy (Malden, Md.: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013), pp. 258–85.

17 Michele Betsill, and Elisabeth Correll, eds., NGO Diplomacy: The Influence of Nongovernmental Organizations in International Environmental Negotiations (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2008).

18 Peter Newell, Climate for Change: Non-state Actors and the Politics of the Greenhouse (Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press, 2000).

19 Haas, Peter, “Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination,” International Organization 46, no. 1 (1992), pp. 1–35 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

20 Peter Haas, Saving the Mediterranean (New York: Columbia University Press, 1990).

21 Michael Barnett, Eyewitness to a Genocide: The United Nations and Rwanda (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 2003).

22 David A. Baldwin, ed., Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993).

23 Seabrooke, Leonard, “Identity Switching and Transnational Professionals,” International Political Sociology 8, no. 3 (2014), pp. 335–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

24 Lloyd Gruber, Ruling the World: Power Politics and the Rise of Supranational Institutions (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000).

25 Robert Falkner, “The Business of Ozone Layer Protection,” in David L. Levy and Peter J. Newell, eds., The Business of Global Environmental Governance (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2005), pp. 105–35.

26 D. G Webster, Adaptive Governance: The Dynamics of Atlantic Fisheries Management (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2009), p. 2.

27 Jonas Meckling and Cameron Hepburn, “Economic Instruments for Climate Change,” in Faulkner, Handbook of Global Climate and Environment Policy, p. 476.

28 Tsingou, “The Club Rules.”