No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 September 2012
The author investigates Status's provocative ideas on the ethical dilemma in statecraft, and then compares and contrasts his position with that of three of the most important contributors to the German tradition of Realpolitik; Frederick the Great, Hegel, and Ranke. He also discusses Status's complex relationship to Social Darwinism and the relationship of his ideas on statecraft to those of one of his most influential critics, Friedrich Meinecke. He argues that the superficial mood of Western triumphalism, precipitated by the crisis of Communism, is symptomatic of the recurrent failure in the United States to soberly reflect upon the prospects for significantly ameliorating the oft-times tragic nature of international political developments in the twentieth century. He claims that conversation with Status, the seminal historical pessimist of the twentieth century, helps to provide an imperfect but useful corrective to this optimistic perspective.
2 “Oswald Spengler, Philosopher Dies,” The New York Times, May 9, 1936, p. 15.Google Scholar
3 For a brief discussion of Spengler's influence on Toynbee, see McNeill, William H., Arnold Toynbee: A Life (New York: Oxford University Press, 1989), pp. 98–102Google Scholar.
4 Ernst, , Rreisach, Historiography: Ancient, Medieval, and Modern (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983), p. 396.Google Scholar
5 Heller, Erich, The Disinherited Mind: Essays in Modern German Literature and Thought, 4th ed. (London: Bowes & Bowes, 1975), p. 182.Google Scholar
6 Spengler, Oswald, Der Untergang des Abendlandes: Umrisse einer Morphologie der Weltgeschichte, Vol. I, Gestalt und Wirklichkeit, rev. ed. (1918; Munich: C. H. Beck'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1923), p. 67.Google Scholar (All the translations from German into English in this article are the author's.)
7 See the following: Toynbee, Arnold, Civilization on Trial (New York: Oxford University Press, 1948), pp. 9–10Google Scholar; Shotwell, James T., The Faith of an Historian and Other Essays (New York: Walker & Co., 1964)Google Scholar; Carr, E. H., “Die Geschichte wiederholt sich nicht.Google ScholarSpengler, Oswald und Toynbee, A.,” Die Kultur (1956/57) no. 92Google Scholar; and Henry A. Kissinger, “The Meaning of History: Reflections on Spengler, Toynbee and Kant” (AB thesis, Harvard University, 1951). With respect to Aron, see Merlio, Gilbert, Oswald Spengler: temoin de son temps (Stuttgart: Akademischer Verlag Hans-Dieter Heinz, 1982).Google Scholar With respect to Niebuhr, see Thompson, Kenneth W., Masters of International Thought (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1980), p. 27Google Scholar; and Joll, James, “Two Prophets of the Twentieth Century: Spengler and Toynbee,” Review of International Studies 11 (1985), pp. 91–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
8 Spengler, Oswald, “Pessimismus?” in Reden und Aufsätze, 2nd ed., ed. Komhardt, Hildegard (1921; Munich: C. H. Beck'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1937), p. 68.Google Scholar
9 Oswald Spengler, “Heraklit: Eine Studie über den energetischen Grundgedanken seiner Philosophie” [1904], in Reden und Aufsätze, pp. 1–47.Google Scholar
10 Spengler, “Pessimismus?” p. 75.Google Scholar
11 Oswald Spengler, Politica, b1–11, Spengler Archives.Google Scholar
12 Wight, Martin, “Why is There No International Theory?” in Butterfield, Herbert and Wight, Martin, eds., Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Politics (London: Allen & Unwin, 1966), p. 20Google Scholar.
13 Ibid., pp. 33–34.Google Scholar
14 See the author's treatise, “Oswald Spengler's Philosophy of World History and International Politics” (Ph.D. dissertation, University of Virginia, 1989); and his article, “The Challenge of Spenglerian Pessimism to Ranke and Political Realism,” Review of International Studies 17 (1991), pp. 267–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
15 Ritter, Gerhard, Das deutsche Problem: Grundfragen deutschen Staatslebens gestern und heute (Munich: R. Oldenbourg Verlag, 1966), p. 19Google Scholar.
16 Herder, Johann Gottfried, Auch eine Philosophie der Geschichte zur Bildung der Menschheit (1774; Stuttgart: Reclam, 1990), p. 100Google Scholar.
17 Kant, Immanuel, “Idee zu einer allgemeinen Geschichte in weltbürgerlicher Absicht,” in Kleinere Schriften zur Geschichtsphilosophie, Ethik, und Politik, ed. Vorlaender, Karl (Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1973), p. 6Google Scholar.
18 Wilhelm, Georg, Hegel, Friedrich, Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Geschichte (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1970), p. 42Google Scholar.
19 Weber, Max, Gesammelte Aufsätze zurReligionssoziologie, Vol. I., 4th ed. (1920; Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1947), p. 14.Google Scholar
20 Koktanek, Anton Mirko, Oswald Spengler in seiner Zeit (Munich: C. H. Beck'sche Verlagsbuch-handlung, 1968), p. 246Google Scholar.
21 Spengler, Oswald, Der Untergang des Abendlandes: Umrisse einer Morphologie der Welt-geschichte, Vol. II, Welthistorische Perspektiven (1922; Munich: C. H. Beck'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1923), pp. 262ff.Google Scholar
22 Nietzsche, Friedrich, Ecce Homo, Vol. VI of Sämtliche Werke. Kritische Studienausgabe, ed. Colli, Giorgio and Montinari, Mazzino, 15 vols., 2nd ed. (Berlin: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag de Gruyter, 1988), p. 367Google Scholar; in all subsequent citations this edition is rendered KSA.
23 See Thompson, Kenneth W., Moralism and Morality in Politics and Diplomacy (New York: University Press of America, 1985), pp. 3ff.Google Scholar
24 Spengler, , Der Untergang des Abendlandes, Vol. II, p. 577.Google Scholar
25 Ibid., pp. 333–34.Google Scholar
26 Ibid., p. 448.Google Scholar
27 Nietzsche, Götzen-Dämmerung, KSA, vol. VI., pp. 106–107.Google Scholar
28 Nietzsche, Vom Nutzen und Nachttheil der Historie für das Leben, KSA, vol. I., p. 321.Google Scholar
29 Spengler, Der Untergang des Abendlandes, Vol. II, pp. 262ff.Google Scholar
30 Ibid., pp. 262–63, 535, 546.Google Scholar
31 Ibid., pp. 543, 629.Google Scholar
32 Ibid., p. 536.Google Scholar
33 Spengler, Oswald, Jahre der Entscheidung (Munich: C. H. Beck'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1933), p. 14Google Scholar.
34 See Wolfers, Arnold, “Political Theory and International Relations,” in Discord and Collaboration: Essays on International Relations (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1962), pp. 233–53.Google Scholar
35 Spengler, , Der Untergang des Abendlandes, Vol. II, p. 550.Google Scholar
36 Hegel, , Philosophic der Geschichte, p. 17Google Scholar.
37 Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts, ed. Hoffmeisler, Johannes (Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1955), p. 285 (par. 333) and p. 286 (par. 334).Google Scholar
38 Spengler noted his debt to Hegel, singling out his Lectures on the Philosophy of History along with the works of Leibnitz, Goethe, and Nietzsche as the “hidden prerequisites, which unconsciously lay at the basis of my style of thinking.” (Spengler, “Pessimismus?” p. 66.).Google Scholar
39 Spengler, Oswald, Preussentum und Sozialismus (Munich: C. H. Beck'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1920), p. 7Google Scholar.
40 In 1879, in the conclusion to the revised edition of Serbia and Turkey in the Nineteenth Century, Ranke waxed lyrical about the “genius of the Occident” and he celebrated the cultural and civilizational success of the West. (vonRanke, Leopold, Aus Werk und Nachlaβ, ed. Fuchs, Walther Peter and Schieder, Theodor, vol. II, Über die Epochen der neueren Geschichte, ed. Schieder, Theodor and Berding, Helmut [Munich: R. Oldenbourg Verlag, 1971], pp. 59–60.Google Scholar)
41 Oswald Spengler, letter dated November 3,1933, Briefe, 1913–1936, ed. Koktanek, Anton Mirko in collaboration with Manfred Schröter (Munich: C. H. Beck'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1963), p. 710.Google Scholar
42 Spengler, , Der Untergang des Abendlandes, Vol. I, p. 454.Google Scholar
43 Quoted in Meinecke, Friedrich, Die Idee der Staatsräson in der neueren Geschichte (Munich: R. Oldenbourg Verlag, 1957), p. 469Google Scholar.
44 See the final chapter entitled, “Wege zur Emeuerung,” of Meinecke, Friedrich, Die deutsche Katastrophe: Betrachtungen und Errinerungen (Wiesbaden: F. A. Brockhaus, 1946Google Scholar).
45 Spengler, letter dated October 25,1914, Briefe, p. 29.Google Scholar
46 Meinecke, Staatsrason, pp. 502, 509.Google Scholar
47 The term Social Darwinism was first coined in 1906 by biologists and sociologists, acquiring widespread acceptance with the publication of Social Darwinism in American Thought by Hofstadter, Richard, Zmarzlik, Hans-Günter, “Der Sozialdarwinismus in Deutschland als geschichtliches Problem,” Vierteljahreshefte für Zeitgeschichte 11 (1963), p. 246Google Scholar.
48 Faber, Karl-Georg, “Realpolitik als Ideologie: Die Bedeutung des Jahres 1866 für das politische Denken in Deutschland,” Historische Zeitschrift 203 (1966), p. 26CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
49 Koch, H. W., “Die Rolle des Sozialdarwinismus als Faktor im Zeitalter des neuen Imperialismus um die Jahrhundertwende,” Zeitschrift für Politik, 16 (1970), p. 57Google Scholar.
50 Wehler, Hans-Ulrich, “Sozialdarwinismus im expandierenden Industriestaat,” in Geiss, Imanuel and Wendt, Bernd J., eds., Deutschland in der Weltpolitik des 19. und 20. Jahrhunderts (Düsseldorf: Bertelsmann Universitatsverlag, 1973), pp. 140–41Google Scholar.
51 Spengler, , Der Untergang des Abendlandes, Vol. II, p. 417.Google Scholar
52 In his writings Spengler does not use race as a biological category as did racist theorists of history and culture like Arthur Comte de Gobineau in Essai sur ľInégaUté des Races Humaines, Houston Stewart Chamberlain in Foundations of the Nineteenth Century, and Adolf Hitler in Mein Kampf. For Spengler, race (Rasse) was an attribute which had a number of representatives in all peoples. It denoted physical vigor, healthy instincts, and, interestingly, a sense of political realism.Google Scholar
53 For a discussion of this dramatic change in Spengler's thought see Farrenkopf, John, “The Transformation of Spengler's Philosophy of World History,” Journal of the History of Ideas 52 (1991), pp. 463–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
54 See Iggers, Georg G., The German Conception of History: The National Tradition of Historical Thought from Herder to the Present, rev. ed. (Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 1983), p. 121Google Scholar; and Merlio, , Oswald Spengler, vol. II, p. 709Google Scholar.
55 Meinecke, , Staatsräson, p. 500Google Scholar.
56 See Keohane, Robert O. and Nye, Joseph S., Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition (Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1977).Google Scholar