Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T01:11:52.901Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Against Democratic Interventionism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2015

Anna Stilz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Symposium: Justice and Foreign Policy
Information
Ethics & International Affairs , Volume 29 , Issue 3 , Fall 2015 , pp. 259 - 268
Copyright
Copyright © Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1 Michael Blake, Justice and Foreign Policy (New York: Oxford University Press, 2013). Hereafter cited parenthetically by page number.

2 I note that while Blake focuses on coercive intervention, this is a broader category than military intervention, including also economic sanctions (p. 52).

3 Rawls also suggests that liberal states should tolerate some illiberal regimes, specifically decent consultation hierarchies. See Rawls, The Law of Peoples (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1999), pp. 62–78.

4 At certain points in the text—particularly ch. 3—Blake places less stress on autonomy, and speaks simply of “equal treatment” (p. 63). However, grounding equality in respect for autonomy is of fundamental importance for Blake's view.

5 For powerful accounts, see Luther Standing Bear, My People the Sioux (Bison Books, 2013); Jonathan Lear, Radical Hope (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2006).

6 John Locke, Second Treatise (London: Awnsham Churchill, 1689), ch. 10.

7 Immanuel Kant, Metaphysics of Morals, §46 (6:314–16); “Perpetual Peace,” (8:352–53).

8 John Stuart Mill, Considerations on Representative Government (London: Parker, Son, and Bourn, West Strand, 1861), ch. 4.

9 Joshua Cohen offers a similar argument in “Is There a Human Right to Democracy?,” in The Arc of the Moral Universe (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2010), pp. 357–58.