Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T18:43:38.092Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Promoting Human Rights

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2012

Extract

All wars—and the current war on terrorism is no exception—provide serious tests for the rule of law. The demands of armed conflict, with its instantaneous decisions of life and death, do not lend themselves easily to legal constraint. It is thus not surprising that the United States, which has been outspoken historically on matters of human rights, would become less attentive to those concerns after coming under deadly attack. For Human Rights Watch (HRW) and other human rights organizations, the primary concern since September 11 has been to demonstrate that upholding fundamental rights, whether on the battlefields of Afghanistan or in the detention facilities at Guantánamo Bay, is not only consistent with fighting international terrorism, but is, in essence, what the war is all about. The unwillingness of the Bush administration to embrace this idea bodes ill for the protection of rights as the war on terrorism reaches across the globe.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Laqueur, WalterReflections on Terrorism Foreign Affairs 1986 65 no.186100CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 See the articles in the Roundtable, The New War:What Rules Apply Ethics & International Affairs 2002 16 no.1126Google Scholar.

3 See, e.g., Lopez, LeslieU.S.Detains Suspect in Singapore Plot Wall Street JournalJuly 12, 2002p.A6Google Scholar.