Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:02:42.723Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Global Power Shifts, Diversity, and Hierarchy in International Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2019

Inderjeet Parmar
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Liberal internationalism is under the microscope as never before as it faces a world experiencing turbulence and anxiety. The specter of right-wing authoritarianism and even fascism haunt Western societies as struggles for recognition dominate domestic politics, while demands of (re)emerging states for international representation grow more compelling. Simultaneously, there is broader recognition of a growing legitimacy crisis of the American hegemon principally due to the mindsets and failures of its liberal hegemonic elites. Both developments are major advances in the understandings of how the West dominates “diversity regimes” and co-opts discourses universal in origin and character and of how the U.S. foreign policy establishment has brought the world to the current conjuncture. Yet, there are limitations still. Although central, the concepts of diversity, hierarchy, and elites need to be broadened out significantly, and rooted in corporate-class power, to fully comprehend the core crises of the international order today.

Keywords

diversity regimehierarchyelitesorganic intellectualsultra-imperialismclassclass inequalityWestern hegemonyliberal orderKoch Foundation
Type
Review Essay
Information
Ethics & International Affairs , Volume 33 , Issue 2 , Summer 2019 , pp. 231 - 244
Copyright
Copyright © Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1 Ikenberry, G. John, Parmar, Inderjeet, and Stokes, Doug, “Introduction: Ordering the World? Liberal Internationalism in Theory and Practice,” International Affairs 94, no. 1 (January 2018), pp. 1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Those themes are discussed and critiqued as being essentially embedded in liberal internationalism in Parmar, Inderjeet, “Racial and Imperial Thinking in International Theory and Politics: Truman, Attlee, and the Korean War,” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 18, no. 2 (April 2016), pp. 351–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Smith, Tony, Why Wilson Matters: The Origin of American Liberal Internationalism and Its Crisis Today (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2017)Google Scholar; Walt, Stephen M., The Hell of Good Intentions: America's Foreign Policy Elite and the Decline of U.S. Primacy (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2018)Google Scholar; Mearsheimer, John J., The Great Delusion: Liberal Dreams and International Realities (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Ledwidge, Mark, Verney, Kevern, and Parmar, Inderjeet, eds., Barack Obama and the Myth of a Post-Racial America (New York: Routledge, 2014)Google Scholar.

5 Acharya, Amitav, “‘Idea Shift’: How Ideas from the Rest are Reshaping the Global Order,” Third World Quarterly 37, no. 7 (2016), p. 1165CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Gramsci's analysis of the role of intellectuals is very important since we are discussing scholars advancing major ideas critiquing existing orders or ways of thinking about and doing things. It situates them in a relationship with major institutions, states, elites, and classes, which therefore play an important role in the limited character of their analyses and suggested changes. This is not to suggest any kind of malign or deliberate sinister outside influence but to argue that ideas develop in certain milieus, intellectual and political communities and networks, and research funding regimes with specific priorities. See Parmar, Inderjeet, Foundations of the American Century: The Ford, Carnegie, and Rockefeller Foundations in the Rise of American Power (New York: Columbia University Press, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Golub, Philip S., “From the New International Economic Order to the G20: How the ‘Global South’ Is Restructuring World Capitalism from Within,” Third World Quarterly 34, no. 6 (July 2013), pp. 1000–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Clearly, this view of culture's significance has echoes of the work of Gramsci, the British Gramscian Stuart McPhail Hall, and Edward Said.

9 Farer, Tom J., “The United States and the Third World: A Basis for Accommodation,” Foreign Affairs 54, no. 1 (October 1975), pp. 91–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10 Haider, Asad, Mistaken Identity: Race and Class in the Age of Trump (London: Verso, 2018)Google Scholar.

11 Anthony Eden, quoted in Parmar, Inderjeet, Special Interests, the State and the Anglo-American Alliance, 1939–1945 (London: Routledge, 1995), p. 191Google Scholar.

12 Council of Economic Advisers, The Opportunity Costs of Socialism (Washington, D.C.: Executive Office of the President of the United States, October 2018)Google Scholar, www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/The-Opportunity-Costs-of-Socialism.pdf; and Frank Newport, “The Meaning of ‘Socialism’ to Americans Today,” Gallup, October 4, 2018, news.gallup.com/opinion/polling-matters/243362/meaning-socialism-americans-today.aspx.

13 See “MIT and Harvard Kennedy School Launch Collaborative International Studies Program,” Charles Koch Foundation, www.charleskochfoundation.org/news/mit-harvard-launch-collaborative-international-studies-program/; and Thomas B. Edsall, “Trump and the Koch Brothers Are Working in Concert,” New York Times, September 6, 2018, www.nytimes.com/2018/09/06/opinion/trump-koch-brothers-alliance.html. Mearsheimer indicates Koch Foundation support for his book in the book's preface. See Mearsheimer, Great Delusion, p. x.

14 van Apeldoorn, Bastiaan and De Graaff, Naná, American Grand Strategy and Corporate Elite Networks: The Open Door since the End of the Cold War (London: Routledge, 2016)Google Scholar.

15 Mearsheimer, Great Delusion; Walt, Hell of Good Intentions.

16 Global Risks 2018: Fractures, Fears and Failures, World Economic Forum, reports.weforum.org/global-risks-2018/global-risks-2018-fractures-fears-and-failures/; Kara Chin, Jacqui Frank, and Ali Newhard, “Ray Dalio Says the Economy Looks like 1937 and a Downturn is Coming in about Two Years,” Business Insider, September 18, 2018, www.businessinsider.com/ray-dalio-bridgewater-debt-crisis-downturn-coming-about-two-years-2018-9?r=US&IR=T (Dalio is the founder of Bridgewater Associates, a hedge fund); Bremmer, Ian, Us vs. Them: The Failure of Globalism (New York: Portfolio, 2018)Google Scholar.

17 Gramsci, Antonio, Selections from the Prison Notebooks, trans. and ed. Hoare, Quintin and Smith, Geoffrey Nowell (New York: International, 1971), p. 210Google Scholar.