Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T03:32:53.537Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Time domain simulation of a piano. Part 1: model description

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2014

J. Chabassier ,
A. Chaigne  and
P. Joly
J. Chabassier
Affiliation:
Magique 3D team, Inria Sud Ouest, 200 avenue de la vieille tour, 33405 Talence cedex, France
A. Chaigne
Affiliation:
UME ENSTA, Chemin de la hunière, 91761 Palaiseau, France
P. Joly
Affiliation:
POems team, Inria Rocquencourt, domaine de Voluceau, BP 105, 78153 Le Chesnay, France. [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The purpose of this study is the time domain modeling of a piano. We aim at explaining the vibratory and acoustical behavior of the piano, by taking into account the main elements that contribute to sound production. The soundboard is modeled as a bidimensional thick, orthotropic, heterogeneous, frequency dependent damped plate, using Reissner Mindlin equations. The vibroacoustics equations allow the soundboard to radiate into the surrounding air, in which we wish to compute the complete acoustical field around the perfectly rigid rim. The soundboard is also coupled to the strings at the bridge, where they form a slight angle from the horizontal plane. Each string is modeled by a one dimensional damped system of equations, taking into account not only the transversal waves excited by the hammer, but also the stiffness thanks to shear waves, as well as the longitudinal waves arising from geometric nonlinearities. The hammer is given an initial velocity that projects it towards a choir of strings, before being repelled. The interacting force is a nonlinear function of the hammer compression. The final piano model is a coupled system of partial differential equations, each of them exhibiting specific difficulties (nonlinear nature of the string system of equations, frequency dependent damping of the soundboard, great number of unknowns required for the acoustic propagation), in addition to couplings’ inherent difficulties.

Keywords

Pianomodelingenergyprecursor and phantom partialsdamping mechanisms
Type
Research Article
Information
ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis , Volume 48 , Issue 5 , September 2014 , pp. 1241 - 1278
Copyright
© EDP Sciences, SMAI, 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ircam Médiations Recherche/Crèation 1. Modalys (2007). http://forumnet.ircam.fr/701.html.
Askenfelt, A. and Jansson, E.V., From touch to string vibrations. I: Timing in the grand piano action. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 88 (1990) 52. Google Scholar
A. Askenfelt, Observations on the transient components of the piano tone. KTH (1993).
Bank, B., Avanzini, F., Borin, G., De Poli, G., Fontana, F. and Rocchesso, D., Physically informed signal processing methods for piano sound synthesis: a research overview. EURASIP J. Appl. Signal Process. 2003 (2003) 941–952. Google Scholar
Bensa, J., Bilbao, S, and Kronland-Martinet, R., The simulation of piano string vibration: from physical models to finite difference schemes and digital waveguides. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 114 (2003) 1095–1107. Google Scholar
Babuska, I., D’Harcourt, J.M. and Schwab, C., Optimal shear correction factors in hierarchical plate modelling. Math. Modell. Sci. Comput. 1 (1993) 1–30. Google Scholar
Bilbao, S, Conservative numerical methods for nonlinear strings. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 118 (2005) 3316–3327. Google Scholar
Boutillon, X, Model for piano hammers: Experimental determination and digital simulation. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 83 (1988) 746–754. Google Scholar
Bank, B. and Sujbert, L., Generation of longitudinal vibrations in piano strings: From physics to sound synthesis. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 117 (2005) 2268–2278. Google ScholarPubMed
Chaigne, A. and Askenfelt, A., Numerical simulation of piano strings. I. A physical model for a struck string using finite-difference methods. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 95 (1994) 1112–1118. Google Scholar
J. Chabassier, A. Chaigne and P. Joly, Transitoires de piano et non linéarités des cordes: mesures et simulations. Proc. of the 10th French Acoustical Society Meeting (in french) (2012).
J. Chabassier and M. Duruflé, Energy based simulation of a Timoshenko beam in non-forced rotation. Application to the flexible piano hammer shank. Wave Motion, submitted in (2013).
Chabassier, J. and Imperiale, S., Stability and dispersion analysis of improved time discretization for simply supported prestressed Timoshenko systems. Application to the stiff piano string. Wave Motion 50 (2012) 456–480. Google Scholar
Chabassier, J. and Joly, P., Energy preserving schemes for nonlinear hamiltonian systems of wave equations. application to the vibrating piano string. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 199 (2010) 2779–2795. Google Scholar
Conklin, H.A., Design and tone in the mechanoacoustic piano. Part II. Piano structure. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 100 (1996) 695–708. Google Scholar
Conklin, H.A., Piano strings and “phantom” partials. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 102 (1997) 659. Google Scholar
Cowper, G.. The shear coefficient in timoshenko’s beam theory. ASME, J. Appl. Math. 33 (1966) 335–340. Google Scholar
J. Cuenca, Modélisation du couplage corde – chevalet – table d’harmonie dans le registre aigu du piano. JJCAAS 2006 (2006) 1–1.
Derveaux, G., Chaigne, A., Joly, P. and Bécache, E., Time-domain simulation of a guitar: Model and method. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 114 (2003) 3368–3383. Google Scholar
K. Ege, La table d’harmonie du piano – études modales en basses et moyennes fréquences. Thèse de Doctorat (2010) 1–190.
Giordano, N. and Jiang, M., Physical modeling of the piano. EURASIP J. Appl. Signal Process. 2004 (2004) 926–933. Google Scholar
Ph. Guillaume, Pianoteq. Available at http://www.pianoteq.com.
Izadbakhsh, A., McPhee, J. and Birkett, S., Dynamic modeling and experimental testing of a piano action mechanism with a flexible hammer shank. J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 3 (2008) 1–10. Google Scholar
P.M. Morse and K.U. Ingard, Theoretical Acoustics. Princeton University Press (1968).
Nakamura, I. and Iwaoka, S., Piano tone synthesis using digital filters by computer simulation. Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, IEEE International Conference on ICASSP’86 11 (1986) 1293–1296. Google Scholar
Podlesak, M. and Lee, A.R., Dispersion of waves in piano strings. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 83 (1988) 305–317. Google Scholar
Rhaouti, L., Chaigne, A. and Joly, P., Time-domain modeling and numerical simulation of a kettledrum. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 105 (1999) 3545–3562. Google Scholar
Reissner, E., The effect of transverse shear deformation on the bending of elastic plates. J. Appl. Mech. 12 (1945) 69–77. Google Scholar
Stulov, A., Hysteretic model of the grand piano hammer felt. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 97 (1995) 2577. Google Scholar
L.T.-Tsien, Global classical solutions for quasilinear hyperbolic systems. Wiley (1994).
Vyasarayani, C.P., Birkett, S. and McPhee, J., Modeling the dynamics of a compliant piano action mechanism impacting an elastic stiff string. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 125 (2009) 4034–4042. Google ScholarPubMed
Weinreich, G., Coupled piano strings. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 62 (1977) 1474. Google Scholar