Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T23:24:12.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tracking with prescribed transient behaviour

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2002

Achim Ilchmann
Affiliation:
Institute of Mathematics, Technical University Ilmenau, Weimarer Straße 25, 98693 Ilmenau, Germany; [email protected].
E. P. Ryan
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY, UK; [email protected].
C. J. Sangwin
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; [email protected].
Get access

Abstract

Universal tracking control is investigated in the context of a class S of M-input, M-output dynamical systems modelled by functional differential equations. The class encompasses a wide variety of nonlinear and infinite-dimensional systems and contains – as a prototype subclass – all finite-dimensional linear single-input single-output minimum-phase systems with positive high-frequency gain. The control objective is to ensure that, for an arbitrary $\mathbb{R}^M$-valued reference signal r of class W1,∞ (absolutely continuous and bounded with essentially bounded derivative) and every system of class S, the tracking error e between plant output and reference signal evolves within a prespecified performance envelope or funnel in the sense that ${\varphi}(t)\| e(t)\| < 1$ for all t ≥ 0, where φ a prescribed real-valued function of class W1,∞ with the property that φ(s) > 0 for all s > 0 and $\liminf_{s\rightarrow\infty}{\varphi}(s)>0$. A simple (neither adaptive nor dynamic) error feedback control of the form $u(t)=- \alpha ({\varphi}(t)\|e(t)\|)e(t)$ is introduced which achieves the objective whilst maintaining boundedness of the control and of the scalar gain $\alpha ({\varphi}(\cdot )\|e(\cdot )\|)$.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© EDP Sciences, SMAI, 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

C.I. Byrnes and J.C. Willems, Adaptive stabilization of multivariable linear systems, in Proc. 23rd Conf. on Decision and Control. Las Vegas (1984) 1574-1577.
Ilchmann, A., Ryan, E.P. and Sangwin, C.J., Systems of controlled functional differential equations and adaptive tracking. SIAM J. Control Optim. 40 (2002) 1746-1764. CrossRef
H. Logemann and A.D. Mawby, Low-gain integral control of infinite dimensional regular linear systems subject to input hysteresis, in Advances in Mathematical Systems Theory, edited by F. Colonius, U. Helmke, D. Prätzel-Wolters and F. Wirth. Birkhäuser Verlag, Boston, Basel, Berlin (2000) 255-293.
Miller, D.E. and Davison, E.J., An adaptive controller which provides an arbitrarily good transient and steady-state response. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control 36 (1991) 68-81. CrossRef
Ryan, E.P. and Sangwin, C.J., Controlled functional differential equations and adaptive stabilization. Int. J. Control 74 (2001) 77-90. CrossRef
Sontag, E.D., Smooth stabilization implies coprime factorization. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control 34 (1989) 435-443. CrossRef
C. Sparrow, The Lorenz equations: Bifurcations, chaos and strange attractors. Springer-Verlag, New York (1982).
Weiss, G., Transfer functions of regular linear systems, Part 1: Characterization of regularity. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 342 (1994) 827-854.