Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T12:00:49.742Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The structure of automorphisms of real suspension flows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2008

Harvey B. Keynes ,
Nelson G. Markley  and
Michael Sears
Harvey B. Keynes
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
Nelson G. Markley
Affiliation:
Mathematics Department, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA
Michael Sears
Affiliation:
Department of Computational and Applied Mathematics, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, RSA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper is motivated by the connections between automorphisms of real suspension flows and ℝ2 suspension actions. Automorphisms which naturally lead to ℤ2-cocyles are examined from the viewpoint of covering theory in terms of an associated cylinder flow. A natural type of automorphisms (called simple) is analyzed via ergodic methods. It is shown that all automorphisms of suspensions built over minimal rotations on tori satisfy this condition. A more general approach using eigenfunctions extends this result to minimal affines, Furstenberg-type distal flows, certain nilmanifolds and a class of non-distal flows on the 2-torus.

Type
Research Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , June 1991 , pp. 349 - 364
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Rigge, D. De & Markley, N.. The structure of codimension one distal flows with non-trivial isotropy. Rocky Mountain J. Math. 9 (1979), 601–616.Google Scholar
[2]Furstenberg, H.. Strict ergodicity and transformations of the torus. Amer. J. Math. 83 (1961), 573–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Glasner, S. & Weiss, B.. On the construction of minimal skew products. Isreal J. Math. 34 4 (1979), 321–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Gottschalk, W. & Hedlund, G.. Topological dynamics. Amer. Math. Soc. Coll. 36 Providence, R.I. (1955).Google Scholar
[5]Hahn, F. & Parry, W.. Minimal dynamical systems with quasi-discrete spectrum. J. London Math. Soc. 40 (1965), 309–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Hoare, H. & Parry, W.. Affine transformations with quasi-discrete spectrum (I). J. London Math. Soc. 41 (1966), 88–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Keynes, H., Markley, N. & Sears, M.. Automorphisms of suspension flows over the circle. Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1342, Springer-Verlag 342–353.Google Scholar
[8]Rees, M.. A point distal transformation of the torus. Israel J. Math. 32 (1979), 201–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Rudolph, D.. Markov tilings of ℝn and representations of ℝn actions. In: Measure and Measurable Dynamics. Contemporary Math. 94 Amer. Math. Soc., Providence 1989, pp. 271–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar