Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:10:25.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Strong pure infiniteness of crossed products

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2016

E. KIRCHBERG  and
A. SIERAKOWSKI
E. KIRCHBERG
Affiliation:
Institut für Mathematik, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, D-10099 Berlin, Germany email [email protected]
A. SIERAKOWSKI
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics & Applied Statistics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia email [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Consider an exact action of a discrete group $G$ on a separable C*-algebra $A$. It is shown that the reduced crossed product $A\rtimes _{\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E},\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}}G$ is strongly purely infinite—provided that the action of $G$ on any quotient $A/I$ by a $G$-invariant closed ideal $I\neq A$ is element-wise properly outer and that the action of $G$ on $A$ is $G$-separating (cf. Definition 5.1). This is the first non-trivial sufficient general criterion for strong pure infiniteness of reduced crossed products of C*-algebras $A$ that are not $G$-simple. In the case $A=\text{C}_{0}(X)$, the notion of a $G$-separating action corresponds to the property that two compact sets $C_{1}$ and $C_{2}$, that are contained in open subsets $C_{j}\subseteq U_{j}\subseteq X$, can be mapped by elements $g_{1},g_{2}$ of $G$ onto disjoint sets $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}_{g_{j}}(C_{j})\subseteq U_{j}$, but satisfy not necessarily the contraction property $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}_{g_{j}}(U_{j})\subseteq \overline{U_{j}}$. A generalization of strong boundary actions on compact spaces to non-unital and non-commutative C*-algebras $A$ (cf. Definition 7.1) is also introduced. It is stronger than the notion of $G$-separating actions by Proposition 7.6, because $G$-separation does not imply $G$-simplicity and there are examples of $G$-separating actions with reduced crossed products that are stably projection-less and non-simple.

Type
Research Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 38 , Issue 1 , February 2018 , pp. 220 - 243
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press, 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Archbold, R. J. and Spielberg, J. S.. Topologically free actions and ideals in discrete C*-dynamical systems. Proc. Edinb. Math. Soc. (2) 37 (1994), 119–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arzhantseva, G., Guba, V. and Sapir, M.. Metrics on diagram groups and uniform embeddings in Hilbert space. Comment. Math. Helv. 81 (2006), 911–929.Google Scholar
Blanchard, E. and Kirchberg, E.. Non-simple purely infinite C*-algebras: the Hausdorff case. J. Funct. Anal. 207 (2004), 461–513.Google Scholar
Brown, L. G. and Pedersen, G. K.. C*-algebras of real rank zero. J. Funct. Anal. 99 (1991), 131–149.Google Scholar
Cuntz, J.. K-theory for certain C*-algebras. Ann. of Math. (2) 113 (1981), 181–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, G. A.. Some simple C*-algebras constructed as crossed products with discrete outer automorphism groups. Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. 16 (1980), 299–311.Google Scholar
Exel, R., Laca, M. and Quigg, J.. Partial dynamical systems and C*-algebras generated by partial isometries. J. Operator Theory 47 (2002), 169–186.Google Scholar
Haagerup, S., Haagerup, U. and Ramirez-Solano, M.. A computational approach to the Thompson group F. Int. J. Algebra Comput. 25 (2015), 875–885.Google Scholar
Haagerup, U. and Picioroaga, G.. New presentations of Thompson’s groups and applications. J. Operator Theory 66 (2011), 217–232.Google Scholar
Jolissaint, P. and Robertson, G.. Simple purely infinite C*-algebras and n-filling actions. J. Funct. Anal. 175 (2000), 197–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawamura, S. and Tomiyama, J.. Properties of topological dynamical systems and corresponding C*-algebras. Tokyo J. Math. 13 (1990), 251–257.Google Scholar
Kirchberg, E. and Rørdam, M.. Non-simple purely infinite C*-algebras. Amer. J. Math. 122 (2000), 637–666.Google Scholar
Kirchberg, E. and Rørdam, M.. Infinite non-simple C*-algebras: absorbing the Cuntz algebras 𝓞 ∞ . Adv. Math. 167(2) (2002), 195–264.Google Scholar
Kirchberg, E. and Sierakowski, A.. Filling families and strong pure infiniteness. Preprint, 2015, arXiv:1503.08519v2.Google Scholar
Kirchberg, E. and Wassermann, S.. Exact groups and continuous bundles of C*-algebras. Math. Ann. 315 (1999), 169–203.Google Scholar
Kishimoto, A.. Outer automorphisms and reduced crossed products of simple C*-algebras. Comm. Math. Phys. 81 (1981), 429–435.Google Scholar
Laca, M. and Spielberg, J.. Purely infinite C*-algebras from boundary actions of discrete groups. J. reine angew. Math. 480 (1996), 125–139.Google Scholar
Olesen, D. and Pedersen, G. K.. Applications of the Connes spectrum to C*-dynamical systems. III. J. Funct. Anal. 45 (1982), 357–390.Google Scholar
Pedersen, G. K.. C*-algebras and Their Automorphism Groups (London Mathematical Society Monographs, 14) . Academic Press, London, 1979.Google Scholar
Renault, J.. The ideal structure of groupoid crossed product C*-algebras, with an appendix by Georges Skandalis. J. Operator Theory 25 (1991), 3–36.Google Scholar
Rørdam, M., Larsen, F. and Laustsen, N.. An Introduction to K-theory for C*-algebras (London Mathematical Society Student Texts, 49) . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000.Google Scholar
Sierakowski, A.. The ideal structure of reduced crossed products. Münster J. Math. 3 (2010), 223–248.Google Scholar