Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T00:08:11.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Physical measures for certain partially hyperbolic attractors on 3-manifolds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 May 2017

RICARDO T. BORTOLOTTI
RICARDO T. BORTOLOTTI*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Matemática – UFPE, Recife, PE, Brazil email [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this work, we analyze ergodic properties of certain partially hyperbolic attractors whose central direction has a neutral behavior; the main feature is a condition of transversality between the projections of unstable leaves, projecting through the stable foliation. We prove that partial hyperbolic attractors satisfying this condition of transversality, neutrality in the central direction and regularity of the stable foliation admit a finite number of physical measures, coinciding with the ergodic u-Gibbs States, whose union of the basins has full Lebesgue measure. Moreover, we describe the construction of robustly non-hyperbolic attractors satisfying these properties.

Type
Original Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , January 2019 , pp. 74 - 104
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press, 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alves, J., Bonatti, C. and Viana, M.. SRB measures for partially hyperbolic systems whose central directions is mostly expanding. Invent. Math. 140 (2000), 351–398.Google Scholar
Araujo, V.. Attractors and time averages for random maps. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire 17 (2000), 307–369.Google Scholar
Araujo, V. and Melbourne, I.. Existence and smoothness of the stable foliation for sectional hyperbolic attractors. Preprint, 2016, arXiv:1604.06924.Google Scholar
Benedicks, M. and Carleson, L.. The dynamics of the Hénon map. Ann. of Math. (2) 133 (1991), 73–169.Google Scholar
Benedicks, M. and Viana, M.. Solution of the basin problem for Hénon-like attractors. Invent. Math. 143 (2001), 375–434.Google Scholar
Benedicks, M. and Young, L.-S.. Sinai–Bowen–Ruelle measures for certain Hénon maps. Invent. Math. 112 (1993), 541–576.Google Scholar
Bonatti, C., Diaz, L. and Viana, M.. Dynamics Beyond Uniform Hyperbolicity (Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences, 102) . Springer, Berlin, 2005.Google Scholar
Bonatti, C. and Viana, M.. SRB measures for partially hyperbolic systems whose central direction is mostly contracting. Israel J. Math. 115 (2000), 157–193.Google Scholar
Bowen, R.. Equilibrium States and the Ergodic Theory of Anosov Diffeomorphisms (Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 470) . Springer, Berlin, 1975.Google Scholar
Bowen, R. and Ruelle, D.. The ergodic theory of Axiom A flows. Invent. Math. 29 (1975), 181–202.Google Scholar
Carvalho, M.. Sinai–Ruelle–Bowen measures for N-dimensional derived from Anosov diffeomorphisms. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 13 (1993), 21–44.Google Scholar
Castaing, C. and Valadier, M.. Convex Analysis and Measurable Multifunctions (Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 580) . Springer, 1977.Google Scholar
Chernov, N.. Markov approximations and decay of correlations for Anosov flows. Ann. of Math. (2) 147 (1998), 269–324.Google Scholar
Dolgopyat, D.. On decay of correlations in Anosov flows. Ann. of Math. (2) 147 (1998), 357–390.Google Scholar
Hirsch, M., Pugh, C. and Shub, M.. Invariant Manifolds (Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 583) . Springer, 1977.Google Scholar
Hertz, F. R., Hertz, J. R. and Ures, R.. A Survey on Partially Hyperbolic Dynamics (Partially Hyperbolic Dynamics, Laminations, and Teichmuller Flow, Fields Inst. Commun., 51) . American Mathematical Society, 2007.Google Scholar
Liverani, C.. On contact Anosov flows. Ann. of Math. (2) 159 (2004), 1275–1312.Google Scholar
Lyubich, M.. Almost every real quadratic map is either regular or stochastic. Ann. of Math. (2) 156 (2002), 1–78.Google Scholar
Mañé, R.. Contributions to the stability conjecture. Topology 17 (1978), 383–396.Google Scholar
Palis, J.. A global perspective for non-conservative dynamics. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire 22 (2005), 485–507.Google Scholar
Pesin, Y.. Dynamical systems with generalized hyperbolic attractors: hyperbolic, ergodic and topological properties. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 12 (1992), 123–151.Google Scholar
Pugh, C., Shub, M. and Wilkinson, A.. Holder foliations. Duke Math. J. 86 (1997), 517–546.Google Scholar
Pujals, E.. Density of hyperbolicity and homoclinic bifurcations for topologically hyperbolic sets. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 20 (2008), 337–408.Google Scholar
Ruelle, D.. A measure associated with Axiom A attractors. Amer. J. Math. 98 (1976), 619–654.Google Scholar
Sataev, E.. Invariant measures for hyperbolic maps with singularities. Russian Math. Surveys 471 (1992), 191–251.Google Scholar
Sinai, Y.. Gibbs measure in ergodic theory. Russian Math. Surveys 27 (1972), 21–69.Google Scholar
Tsujii, M.. Fat solenoidal attractor. Nonlinearity 14 (2001), 1011–1027.Google Scholar
Tsujii, M.. Physical measures for partially hyperbolic surface endomorphism. Acta Math. 194 (2005), 37–132.Google Scholar
Tucker, W.. The Lorenz attractor exists. C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 328(I) (1999), 1197–1202.Google Scholar
Viana, M. and Yang, J.. Physical measures and absolute continuity for one-dimensional center direction. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire 30 (2013), 845–877.Google Scholar
Young, L. S.. Statistical properties of dynamical systems with some hyperbolicity. Ann. of Math. (2) 147 (1998), 585–650.Google Scholar