Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T00:35:12.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Graph covers and ergodicity for zero-dimensional systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 October 2014

TAKASHI SHIMOMURA*
Affiliation:
Nagoya University of Economics, Uchikubo 61-1, Inuyama 484-8504, Japan email [email protected]

Abstract

Bratteli–Vershik systems have been widely studied. In the context of general zero-dimensional systems, Bratteli–Vershik systems are homeomorphisms that have Kakutani–Rohlin refinements. Bratteli diagrams are well suited to analyzing such systems. Besides this approach, general graph covers can be used to represent any zero-dimensional system. Indeed, all zero-dimensional systems can be described as certain kinds of sequences of graph covers that may not be brought about by Kakutani–Rohlin partitions. In this paper, we follow the context of general graph covers to analyze the relations between ergodic measures and circuits of graph covers. First, we formalize the condition for a sequence of graph covers to represent minimal Cantor systems. In constructing invariant measures, we deal with general compact metrizable zero-dimensional systems. In the context of Bratteli diagrams with finite rank, it has previously been mentioned that all ergodic measures should be limits of some combinations of towers of Kakutani–Rohlin refinements. We demonstrate this for the general zero-dimensional case, and develop a theorem that expresses the coincidence of the time average and the space average for ergodic measures. Additionally, we formulate a theorem that signifies the old relation between uniform convergence and unique ergodicity in the context of graph circuits for general zero-dimensional systems. Unlike previous studies, in our case of general graph covers there arises the possibility of the linear dependence of circuits. We give a condition for a full circuit system to be linearly independent. Previous research also showed that the bounded combinatorics imply unique ergodicity. We present a lemma that enables us to consider unbounded ranks of winding matrices. Finally, we present examples that are linked with a set of simple Bratteli diagrams having the equal path number property.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press, 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akin, E., Glasner, E. and Weiss, B.. Generically there is but one self homeomorphism of the Cantor set. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 360 (2008), 36133630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bezuglyi, S., Kwiatkowski, J., Medynets, K. and Solomyak, B.. Finite rank Bratteli diagrams: structure of invariant measures. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 365 (2013), 26372679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. and Gottschalk, W. H.. Homomorphisms of transformation groups. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 94 (1960), 258271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gambaudo, J.-M. and Martens, M.. Algebraic topology for minimal Cantor sets. Ann. Henri Poincaré 7 (2006), 423446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gjerde, R. and Johansen, O.. Bratteli–Vershik models for Cantor minimal systems: applications to Toeplitz flows. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 20 (2000), 16871710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herman, R. H., Putnam, I. and Skau, C.. Ordered Bratteli diagrams, dimension groups, and topological dynamics. Int. J. Math. 3 (1992), 827864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medynets, K.. Cantor aperiodic systems and Bratteli diagrams. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. I 342 (2006), 4346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, M. E.. Construction of almost automorphic symbolic minimal flows. Gen. Topol. Appl. 6 (1976), 4556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shimomura, T.. Special homeomorphisms and approximation for Cantor systems. Topol. Appl. 161 (2014), 178195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walters, P.. An Introduction to Ergodic Theory (Graduate Text in Mathematics, 79). Springer, New York, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar