Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T04:30:48.110Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An alternative approach to the ergodic theory of measured foliations on surfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2008

Mary Rees
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We consider measured foliations on surfaces, and interval exchanges. We give alternative proofs of the following theorems first proved by Masur and (independently) Veech. The action of the diffeomorphism group of the surface on the projective space of measured foliations (with respect to a natural ‘Lebesgue’ measure) is ergodic. Almost all measured foliations are uniquely ergodic. Almost all interval exchanges (again, with respect to a natural ‘Lebesgue’ measure) are uniquely ergodic.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

References

REFERENCES

[1]Arnoux, P.. Echanges d'intervalles et flots sur les surfaces. Monographic No. 29 de l'Enseignement Mathématique, pp. 538. Université de Genève.Google Scholar
[2]Fathi, A., Laudenbach, F. & Poenaru, V. et al. Travaux de Thurston sur les surfaces. Astérisque 6667 (1979).Google Scholar
[3]Keane, M.. Interval exchange transformations. Math. Z. 141 (1975), 2531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Levitt, G.. Pantalons et feuilletages des surfaces. Topology 21 (1982), 934.Google Scholar
[5]Masur, H.. Interval exchange transformations and measured foliations. Ann. Math. 115 (1982), 169200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Sullivan, D.. The density at infinity of a discrete group of hyperbolic motions. IHES Publ. Math. 50 (1979), 171202.Google Scholar
[7]Veech, W.. Gauss measures for transformations on the space of interval exchange maps. Ann. Math. 115 (1982), 201242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar