Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T01:12:56.470Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Upper bounds on measure-theoretic tail entropy for dominated splittings

Part of: Dynamical systems with hyperbolic behavior Smooth dynamical systems: general theory Ergodic theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2019

YONGLUO CAO ,
GANG LIAO  and
ZHIYUAN YOU
YONGLUO CAO
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, East China Normal University, Shanghai200062, China email [email protected] School of Mathematical Sciences, Center for Dynamical Systems and Differential Equations, Soochow University, Suzhou215006, China email [email protected], [email protected]
GANG LIAO
Affiliation:
School of Mathematical Sciences, Center for Dynamical Systems and Differential Equations, Soochow University, Suzhou215006, China email [email protected], [email protected]
ZHIYUAN YOU
Affiliation:
School of Mathematical Sciences, Center for Dynamical Systems and Differential Equations, Soochow University, Suzhou215006, China email [email protected], [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

For differentiable dynamical systems with dominated splittings, we give upper estimates on the measure-theoretic tail entropy in terms of Lyapunov exponents. As our primary application, we verify the upper semi-continuity of metric entropy in various settings with domination.

Keywords

measure-theoretic tail entropydominated splittingupper semi-continuity

MSC classification

Primary: 37A35: Entropy and other invariants, isomorphism, classification
Secondary: 37D30: Partially hyperbolic systems and dominated splittings 37C40: Smooth ergodic theory, invariant measures
Type
Original Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 40 , Issue 9 , September 2020 , pp. 2305 - 2316
Check for updates
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press, 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdenur, F., Bonatti, C. and Crovisier, S.. Uniform hyperbolicity for C 1 -generic diffeomorphisms. Israel J. Math. 183 (2011), 1–60.Google Scholar
Avila, A., Crovisier, S. and Wilkinson, A.. Diffeomorphisms with positive metric entropy. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 124 (2016), 319–347.Google Scholar
Bochi, J. and Viana, M.. The Lyapunov exponents of generic volume-preserving and symplectic maps. Ann. Math. 161 (2005), 1423–1485.Google Scholar
Bonatti, C. and Viana, M.. SRB measures for partially hyperbolic systems whose central direction is mostly contracting. Israel J. Math. 115 (2000), 157–193.Google Scholar
Bowen, R.. Entropy expansive maps. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 164 (1972), 323–331.Google Scholar
Burguet, D.. A direct proof of the tail variational principle and its extension to maps. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 29 (2009), 357–369.Google Scholar
Burns, D. and Wilkinson, A.. On the ergodicity of partially hyperbolic systems. Ann. of Math. (2) 171 (2010), 451–489.Google Scholar
Buzzi, J., Crovisier, S. and Fisher, T.. Entropy of $C^{1}$ diffeomorphisms without a dominated splitting. Preprint, 2016, arXiv:1606.01765.Google Scholar
Cao, Y. and Yang, D.. On Pesin’s entropy formula for dominated splittings without mixed behavior. J. Differential Equations 261 (2016), 3964–3986.Google Scholar
Downarowicz, T.. Entropy structure. J. Anal. Math. 96 (2005), 57–116.Google Scholar
Hirsch, M., Pugh, C. and Shub, M.. Invariant Manifolds (Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 583). Springer, Berlin, 1977.Google Scholar
Liao, G., Sun, W. and Wang, S.. Upper semi-continuity of entropy map for nonuniformly hyperbolic systems. Nonlinearity 28 (2015), 2977–2992.Google Scholar
Liao, G., Viana, M. and Yang, J.. The entropy conjecture for diffeomorphisms away from tangencies. J. Eur. Math. Soc. 15 (2013), 2043–2060.Google Scholar
Mañé, R.. Contributions to the stability conjecture. Topology 17 (1978), 383–396.Google Scholar
Mañé, R.. Oseledec’s theorem from the generic viewpoint. Proc. Int. Congress Mathematicians (Warsaw, 1983). Vol. 12. PWN, Warsaw, 1984, pp. 1269–1276.Google Scholar
Misiurewicz, M.. Topological conditional entropy. Studia Math. 2 (1976), 175–200.Google Scholar
Nikolaz, G.. Adapted metrics for dominated splittings. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 27 (2007), 1839–1849.Google Scholar
Oseledec, V. I.. A multiplicative ergodic theorem. Trans. Moscow Math. Soc. 19 (1968), 197–231.Google Scholar
Pliss, V.. On a conjecture due to Smale. Differ. Uravn. 8 (1972), 262–268.Google Scholar
Shub, M.. Topologically transitive diffeomorphisms on 𝕋4. Dynamical Systems (Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 206). Springer, Berlin, 1971, p. 39.Google Scholar
Walters, P.. An Introduction to Ergodic Theory. Springer, Berlin, 1982.Google Scholar
Zang, Y., Yang, D. and Cao, Y.. The entropy conjecture for dominated splitting with multi 1D centers via upper semi-continuity of the metric entropy. Nonlinearity 30 (2017), 3076–3087.Google Scholar