Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T04:14:54.069Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Transitivity of Heisenberg group extensions of hyperbolic systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2011

IAN MELBOURNE ,
VIOREL NIŢICĂ  and
ANDREI TÖRÖK
IAN MELBOURNE
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey GU2 7XH, UK (email: [email protected])
VIOREL NIŢICĂ
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, West Chester University, West Chester, PA 19383, USA (email: [email protected]) Institute of Mathematics of the Romanian Academy, PO Box 1–764, RO-70700 Bucharest, Romania
ANDREI TÖRÖK
Affiliation:
Institute of Mathematics of the Romanian Academy, PO Box 1–764, RO-70700 Bucharest, Romania Department of Mathematics, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204-3008, USA (email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We show that among Cr extensions (r>0) of a uniformly hyperbolic dynamical system with fiber the standard real Heisenberg group ℋn of dimension 2n+1, those that avoid an obvious obstruction to topological transitivity are generically topologically transitive. Moreover, if one considers extensions with fiber a connected nilpotent Lie group with a compact commutator subgroup (for example ℋn/ℤ), among those that avoid the obvious obstruction, topological transitivity is open and dense.

Type
Research Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , February 2012 , pp. 223 - 235
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Bousch, T.. La condition de Walters. Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. 34 (2001), 287–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Field, M., Melbourne, I. and Török, A.. Stable ergodicity for smooth compact Lie group extensions of hyperbolic basic sets. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 25 (2005), 517–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Katok, A. and Hasselblatt, B.. Introduction to the Modern Theory of Dynamical Systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Kargapolov, M. I. and Merzljakov, Ju. I.. Fundamentals of the Theory of Groups (Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 62). Springer, Berlin, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Melbourne, I. and Nicol, M.. Stable transitivity of Euclidean group extensions. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 23 (2003), 611–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Melbourne, I., Niţică, V. and Török, A.. Stable transitivity of certain noncompact extensions of hyperbolic systems. Ann. Henri Poincaré 6 (2005), 725–746.Google Scholar
[7]Melbourne, I., Niţică, V. and Török, A.. A note about stable transitivity of noncompact extensions of hyperbolic systems. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 14 (2006), 355–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Melbourne, I., Niţică, V. and Török, A.. Transitivity of Euclidean-type extensions of hyperbolic systems. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 29 (2009), 1585–1602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Niţică, V.. Stably transitivity for extensions of hyperbolic systems by semidirect products of compact and nilpotent Lie groups. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 29(3) (2011), 1197–1203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Niţică, V. and Pollicott, M.. Transitivity of Euclidean extensions of Anosov diffeomorphisms. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 25 (2005), 257–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Niţică, V. and Török, A.. An open and dense set of stably ergodic diffeomorphisms in a neighborhood of a non-ergodic one. Topology 40 (2001), 259–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Seale, R. Q.. A new proof of Minkowski’s theorem on the product of two linear forms. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 41 (1935), 419–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Winkelmann, J.. Generic subgroups of Lie groups. Topology 41 (2002), 163–181.Google Scholar