Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T04:28:03.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Semigroups of local homeomorphisms and interaction groups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2007

R. EXEL  and
J. RENAULT
R. EXEL
Affiliation:
Departamento de Matemática, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, 88040-900, Florianópolis, Brazil (email: [email protected])
J. RENAULT
Affiliation:
Départment de Mathématiques, Université d’Orléans, 45067 Orléans, France (email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Given a semigroup of surjective local homeomorphisms on a compact space X we consider the corresponding semigroup of *-endomorphisms on C(X) and discuss the possibility of extending it to an interaction group, a concept recently introduced by the first named author. We also define a transformation groupoid whose C*-algebra turns out to be isomorphic to the crossed product algebra for the interaction group. Several examples are considered, including one which gives rise to a slightly different construction and should be interpreted as being the C*-algebra of a certain polymorphism.

Type
Research Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 27 , Issue 6 , December 2007 , pp. 1737 - 1771
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Arzumanian, V. and Renault, J.. Examples of pseudogroups and their C*-algebras. Operator Algebras and Quantum Field Theory (Rome, 1996). International Press, Cambridge, MA, 1997, pp. 93–104.Google Scholar
[2]Deaconu, V.. Groupoids associated with endomorphisms. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 347 (1995), 1779–1786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Deaconu, V.. C*-algebras of commuting endomorphisms. Advances in Operator Algebras and Mathematical Physics (Theta Series in Advanced Mathematics, 5). Theta, Bucharest, 2005, pp. 47–55 [arXiv:math.OA/0406624].Google Scholar
[4]Exel, R.. Amenability for Fell bundles. J. Reine Angew. Math. 492 (1997), 41–73 [arXiv:funct-an/9604009].Google Scholar
[5]Exel, R.. A new look at the crossed-product of a C*-algebra by an endomorphism. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 23 (2003), 1733–1750 [arXiv:math.OA/0012084].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Exel, R.. A new look at the crossed-product of a C*-algebra by a semigroup of endomorphisms. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. to appear [arXiv:math.OA/0511061].Google Scholar
[7]Exel, R. and Vershik, A.. C*-algebras of irreversible dynamical systems. Canad. J. Math. 58 (2006), 39–63 [arXiv:math.OA/0203185].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Hedlund, G. A.. Endormorphisms and automorphisms of the shift dynamical system. Math. Systems Theory 3 (1969), 320–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Ledrappier, F.. Un champ markovien peut être d’entropie nulle et mélangeant. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. A–B 287(7) (1978), A561–A563.Google Scholar
[10]Renault, J.. A Groupoid Approach to C*-algebras (Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 793). Springer, Berlin, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Yeend, T.. Groupoid models for the C*-algebras of topological higher-rank graphs. J. Operator Theory 57(1) (2007), 95–120.Google Scholar