Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T01:25:48.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Foliations and conjugacy, II: the Mendes conjecture for time-one maps of flows

Part of: Smooth dynamical systems: general theory Low-dimensional dynamical systems Dynamical systems with hyperbolic behavior

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2020

JORGE GROISMAN  and
ZBIGNIEW NITECKI
JORGE GROISMAN
Affiliation:
Instituto de Matemática y Estadística Prof. Ing. Rafael Laguardia, Facultad de Ingeniería Julio Herrera y Reissig 565 11300, Montevideo, Uruguay (e-mail: [email protected])
ZBIGNIEW NITECKI*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155, USA
*
e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A diffeomorphism of the plane is Anosov if it has a hyperbolic splitting at every point of the plane. In addition to linear hyperbolic automorphisms, translations of the plane also carry an Anosov structure (the existence of Anosov structures for plane translations was originally shown by White). Mendes conjectured that these are the only topological conjugacy classes for Anosov diffeomorphisms in the plane. Very recently, Matsumoto gave an example of an Anosov diffeomorphism of the plane, which is a Brouwer translation but not topologically conjugate to a translation, disproving Mendes’ conjecture. In this paper we prove that Mendes’ claim holds when the Anosov diffeomorphism is the time-one map of a flow, via a theorem about foliations invariant under a time-one map. In particular, this shows that the kind of counterexample constructed by Matsumoto cannot be obtained from a flow on the plane.

Keywords

dynamics in the planeAnosov diffeomorphismsplanar flowsMendes conjecture

MSC classification

Primary: 37C15: Topological and differentiable equivalence, conjugacy, invariants, moduli, classification 37D20: Uniformly hyperbolic systems (expanding, Anosov, Axiom A, etc.) 37E30: Homeomorphisms and diffeomorphisms of planes and surfaces
Type
Original Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 41 , Issue 11 , November 2021 , pp. 3307 - 3324
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Godbillon, C.. Fibrés en drôites et feuilletages du plan. Enseigne. Math. 18 (1972), 213–244.Google Scholar
Godbillon, C. and Reeb, G.. Fibrés sur le branchement simple. Enseigne. Math. 12 (1966), 277–287.Google Scholar
Groisman, J. and Nitecki, Z.. Foliations and conjugacy: Anosov structures in the plane. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 35 (2015), 1229–1242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haefliger, A. and Reeb, G.. Variétés (non séparées) a une dimension et structures feuilletées du plan. Enseigne. Math. 3 (1957), 107–126.Google Scholar
Kaplan, W.. Regular curve-families filling the plane, I. Duke Math. J. 7 (1940), 154–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, S.. An example of a planar Anosov diffeomorphism without fixed points. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. doi:10.1017/etds.2019.104. Published online 6 December 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendes, P.. On Anosov diffeomorphisms on the plane. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 63 (1977), 231–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palis, J.. On Morse-Smale dynamical systems. Topology 8 (1968), 385–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, W.. An Anosov translation. Dynamical Systems (Proc. Symp. University of Bahia, Salvador, Brasil, July 26–August 14, 1971). Ed. Peixoto, M. M.. Academic Press NY, London, 1973, pp. 667–670.Google Scholar
Whitney, H.. Regular families of curves. Ann. Math. 34 (1933), 244–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar