Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T04:46:27.279Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Absolutely continuous invariant measures for non-uniformly expanding maps

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2009

HUYI HU  and
SANDRO VAIENTI
HUYI HU
Affiliation:
Mathematics Department, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA (email: [email protected])
SANDRO VAIENTI
Affiliation:
UMR-6207 Centre de Physique Théorique, CNRS, Universités d’Aix-Marseille I, II, Université du Sud Toulon-Var and FRUMAM, Fédéderation de Recherche des Unitiés de Mathématiques de Marseille, France (email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

For a large class of non-uniformly expanding maps of ℝm, with indifferent fixed points and unbounded distortion and that are non-necessarily Markovian, we construct an absolutely continuous invariant measure. We extend previously used techniques for expanding maps on quasi-Hölder spaces to our case. We give general conditions and provide examples to which our results apply.

Type
Research Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 29 , Issue 4 , August 2009 , pp. 1185 - 1215
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Adl-Zarabi, K.. Absolutely continuous invariant measures for piecewise expanding C 2 transformations in ℝn on domains with cusps on the boundaries. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 16 (1996), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Alves, J. F., Bonatti, C. and Viana, M.. SRB measures for partially hyperbolic systems whose central direction in mostly expanding. Invent. Math. 140 (2000), 351–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Blank, M.. Stochastic properties of deterministic dynamical systems. Sov. Sci. Rev. C Math. Phys. 6 (1987), 243–271.Google Scholar
[4]Boyarsky, A. and Gora, P.. Absolutely continuous invariant measures for piecewise expanding C 2 transformations in ℝn. Israel J. Math. 67 (1987), 272–286.Google Scholar
[5]Buzzi, J.. Absolutely continuous invariant probability measures for arbitrary expanding piecewise R-analytic mappings of the plane. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 20 (2000), 697–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Buzzi, J. and Keller, G.. Zeta functions and transfer operators for multidimensional piecewise affine and expanding maps. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 21 (2001), 689–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Buzzi, J., Paccaut, F. and Schmitt, B.. Conformal measures for multidimensional piecewise invertible maps. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 21 (2001), 1035–1049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Cowienson, W. J.. Absolutely continuous invariant measures for most piecewise smooth expanding maps. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 22 (2002), 1061–1078.Google Scholar
[9]Fan, A. and Jiang, Y.. On Ruelle–Perron–Frobenius operators. I. Ruelle theorem. Comm. Math. Phys. 223 (2001), 125–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Hu, H.. Equilibriums of some non-Hölder potentials. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 390 (2008), 2153–2190.Google Scholar
[11]Ionescu-Tulcea, C. and Marinescu, G.. Théorie ergodique pour des classes d’opérations non complétement continues. Ann. of Math. (2) 52 (1950), 140–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Keller, G.. Generalized bounded variation and applications to piecewise monotonic transformations. Z. Wahr. verw. Geb. 69 (1985), 461–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Lasota, A. and Yorke, J. A.. On the existence of invariant measures for piecewise monotonic transformations. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 186 (1973), 481–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Poppe, H., Gora, P. and Boyarsky, A.. Inadequacy of the bounded variation technique in the ergodic theory of higher-dimensional transformations in ℝn. Israel J. Math. 3 (1990), 1081–1087.Google Scholar
[15]Pianigiani, G.. First return map and invariant measures. Israel J. Math. 35 (1980), 32–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Saussol, B.. Absolutely continuous invariant measures for multidimensional expanding maps. Israel J. Math. 116 (2000), 223–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Shilov, G. and Gurevich, B.. Integral, Measure, and Derivative; a Unified Approach. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1966.Google Scholar
[18]Thaler, M.. Estimates of the invariant densities of endomorphisms with indifferent periodic points. Israel J. Math. 37 (1980), 303–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19]Tsujii, M.. Absolutely continuous invariant measures for expanding piecewise linear maps. Invent. Math. 143 (2001), 349–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20]Young, L.-S.. Statistical properties of dynamical systems with some hyperbolicity. Ann. of Math. (2) 147 (1950), 585–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21]Young, L.-S.. Recurrence times and rates of mixing. Israel J. Math. 110 (1999), 153–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22]Yuri, M.. Invariant measures for certain multi-dimensional maps. Nonlinearity 7 (1994), 1093–1124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23]Yuri, M.. On the speed of convergence to equilibrium states for multi-dimensional maps with indifferent periodic points. Nonlinearity 15 (2002), 429–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar