Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T14:15:34.502Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relationships between exercise capacity and front hoof longitudinal balance in horses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

G Tacchio ,
HMS Davies ,
M Morgante  and
D Bernardini
G Tacchio*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Cliniche Veterinarie, Università degli Studi di Padova, 35 020 Agripolis Legnaro (PD), Italy
HMS Davies
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Science, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia
M Morgante
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Cliniche Veterinarie, Università degli Studi di Padova, 35 020 Agripolis Legnaro (PD), Italy
D Bernardini
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Cliniche Veterinarie, Università degli Studi di Padova, 35 020 Agripolis Legnaro (PD), Italy
*
*[email protected]
Get access

Abstract

To the authors' knowledge, the effect of hoof balance alteration on exercise capacity or performance has not been investigated. With the aim of evaluating the relationships between longitudinal front hoof balance and exercise capacity (lactate vs. speed relationship, run time and stride characteristics), two experiments were undertaken. In the first test the horses, left unshod, performed an incremental speed test in which parameters chosen to evaluate exercise capacity were related to hoof longitudinal balance. In the second part of the study the same group of horses had the length of the toe altered (decreased and increased) with the application of shoes, while the angle of the foot and the height of the foot from the ground remained the same. The relative change in exercise capacity due to the alteration of longitudinal balance was observed. In the unshod experiment, lactate level at the speed of 10 ms-1 (5.0±2.0 mmoll-1) was significantly associated with the angles DC° (angle described by the dorsal cortex with respect to the ground; 50.0±3.2°) and PC° (angle described by the palmar cortex with respect to the ground; 29.6 ± 2.9°), while run time (14.07 ± 1.44 min) was associated with breakover indices (Breakover index1 0.33±0.03; Breakover index2 0.30 ± 0.04 – all values mean ± standard deviation (SD)) (breakover indices were created to express the distance between the point of the toe and the point of the third phalanx relative to the length of the palmar cortex or relative to the distance between the point of the third phalanx and the centre of rotation of the distal interphalangeal joint). These associations have to be judged cautiously because the influence of hoof balance on exercise capacity could be biased by other physiological factors and because hoof balance parameters themselves could reflect the conformation of other anatomical structures far from the phalanges. The selective alteration of front hoof balance in the second part of the study produced a significant difference in blood lactate level only at 6 ms-1 (mean ± SD: La6?m?s-1 0.32 ± 0.39 mmoll-1), with this benefit in terms of lactate level being associated with an increase in stride length (mean ± SD: ΔSL6ms-1 0.01 ± 0.05 m; ΔSL10ms-1 0.112 ± 0.218 m). In conclusion, while higher exercise capacity seemed to be associated with lower DC°, PC° and breakover indices, decreasing the toe length without altering the foot angle was beneficial only in terms of lactate level at the speed of 6 ms-1 for horses with DC° greater than 45°; this benefit was accompanied by a slight lengthening of the stride at both 6 and 10 ms-1.

Keywords

hoof balancebreakover indexexercise capacitytoe length
Type
Research Paper
Information
Equine and Comparative Exercise Physiology , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , February 2005 , pp. 27 - 36
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Kane, AJ, Stover, SM, Gardner, IA, Bock, KB, Case, JT, Johnson, BJ et al. (1998). Hoof size, shape, and balance as possible risk factors for catastrophic musculoskeletal injury of thoroughbred racehorses. American Journal of Veterinary Research 59: 1545–1552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Clayton, HM (1987). Comparison of the stride of trotting horses trimmed with a normal and a broken-back hoof axis. Proceedings of the American Association of Equine Practice 32: 289–298.Google Scholar
3Colahan, P, Leach, D, Muir, G (1991). Center of pressure location of the hoof with and without hoof wedges. In: Persson, SGB, Lindholm, A & Jeffcott, LB (eds), Equine Exercise Physiology 3. Davis, CA: ICEEP Publications. pp. 113–119.Google Scholar
4Riemersma, DJ, van den, Bogert AJ, Jansen, MO and Shamhardt, HC (1996). Influence of shoeing on ground reaction forces and tendon strains in the forelimbs of ponies. Equine Veterinary Journal 28: 126–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Balch, O, Clayton, H, Lanovaz, J (1996). Weight- and length-induced changes in limb kinematics in trotting horses. Proceedings of the American Association of Equine Practice 42: 218–219.Google Scholar
6Wilson, AM, Seelig, TJ, Shield, RA and Silverman, BW (1998). The effect of foot imbalance on point of force application in the horse. Equine Veterinary Journal 30: 540–545.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Willemen, MA, Salveberg, HHCM and Barneveld, A (1999). The effect of orthopaedic shoeing on the force exerted by the deep digital flexor tendon on the navicular bone in horses. Equine Veterinary Journal 31: 25–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Clayton, HM, Willemen, MA, Lanovaz, JL and Shamhardt, HC (2000). Effects of a heel wedge in horses with superficial digital flexor tendonitis. Veterinary Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology 13: 1–8.Google Scholar
9Crevier-Denoix, N, Roosen, C, Dardillat, C, Pourcelot, P, Jerbi, H, Saana, M et al. (2001). Effects of heel and toe elevation upon the digital joint angles in the standing horse. Equine Veterinary Journal Supplement 33: 33: 74–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Eliashar, E, McGuigan, MP, Rogers, KA, Wilson, AM (2002). A comparison of three horseshoeing styles on the kinetics of breakover in sound horses. Equine Veterinary Journal 34: 184–190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Billat, LV (1996). Use of lactate measurements for prediction of exercise performance and for control of training. Sports Medicine 22: 157–175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Persson, SGB (1983). Analysis of fitness and state of training. Equine Exercise Physiology. In: Cambridge: Granta Editions.Google Scholar
13Tacchio, G, Davies, HMS, Morgante, M and Bernardini, D (2002). A radiographic technique to assess longitudinal balance in front hooves. Equine Veterinary Journal Supplement 34: 368–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Daniels, J, Daniels, N (1992). Running economy of elite male and elite female runners. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 24: 483–489.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15Roberts, TJ, Marsh, RL, Weyand, PG and Taylor, CR (1997). Muscular force in running turkeys: the economy of minimizing work. Science 275: 1113–1114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16Pennisi, E (1997). A new concept of how leg muscles operate on the run. Science 275: 1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Balch, O, Clayton, H and Lanovaz, J (1994). Effects of increasing hoof length on limb kinematics of trotting horses. Proceedings of the American Association of Equine Practice 40: 43–44.Google Scholar
18Balch, O, White, K and Butler, D (1991). Factors involved in the balancing of equine hooves. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 198: 1980–1989.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed