Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T02:01:33.020Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ground reaction force and hoof deceleration patterns on two different surfaces at the trot

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2006

Pia Gustås ,
Christopher Johnston  and
Stig Drevemo
Pia Gustås*
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy and Physiology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
Christopher Johnston
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy and Physiology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden Department of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
Stig Drevemo
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy and Physiology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
*
*Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to compare the hoof deceleration and ground reaction forces following impact on two different surfaces. Seven unshod Standardbreds were trotted by hand at 3.0–5.7 m s− 1 over a force plate covered by either of the two surfaces, sandpaper or a 1 cm layer of sand. Impact deceleration data were recorded from one triaxial accelerometer mounted on the fore- and hind hooves, respectively. Ground reaction force data were obtained synchronously from a force plate, sampled at 4.8 kHz. The differences between the two surfaces were studied by analysing representative deceleration and force variables for individual horses. The maximum horizontal peak deceleration and the loading rates of the vertical and the horizontal forces were significantly higher on sandpaper compared with the sand surface (P < 0.001). In addition, the initial vertical deceleration was significantly higher on sandpaper in the forelimb (P < 0.001). In conclusion, it was shown that the different qualities of the ground surface result in differences in the hoof-braking pattern, which may be of great importance for the strength of the distal horse limb also at slow speeds.

Keywords

accelerometerhorseimpactkinematicskineticslocomotion
Type
Research Paper
Information
Equine and Comparative Exercise Physiology , Volume 3 , Issue 4 , November 2006 , pp. 209 - 216
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Pratt, GW and O'Connor, JT Jr (1976). Force plate studies of equine biomechanics. American Journal of Veterinary Research 37: 1251–1255.Google ScholarPubMed
2Hjertén, G and Drevemo, S (1994). Semi-quantitative analysis of hoof-strike in the horse. Journal of Biomechanics 27: 997–1004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Merkens, HW and Schamhardt, HC (1994). Relationships between ground reaction force patterns and kinematics in the walking and trotting horse. Equine Veterinary Journal Supplement 17: 67–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Radin, EL, Yang, KH, Riegger, C, Kish, VL and O'Connor, JJ (1991). Relationship between lower limb dynamics and knee joint pain. Journal of Orthopedical Research 9: 398–405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Radin, EL, Parker, HG, Pugh, JW, Steinberg, RS, Paul, IL and Rose, RM (1973). Response of joints to impact loading – III relationship between trabecular microfractures and cartilage degeneration. Journal of Biomechanics 6: 51–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Serink, MT, Nachemson, A and Hansson, G (1977). The effect of impact loading on rabbit knee joints. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica 48: 250–262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Lahm, A, Uhl, M, Erggelet, C, Haberstroh, J and Mrosek, E (2004). Articular cartilage degeneration after acute subchondral bone damage. An experimental study in dogs with histopathological grading. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica 75: 762–767.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Lahm, A, Uhl, M, Edlich, M, Erggelet, C, Haberstroh, J and Kreuz, PC (2005). An experimental canine model for subchondral lesions of the knee joint. The Knee 12: 51–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Gustås, P, Johnston, C, Roepstorff, L and Drevemo, S (2001). In vivo transmission of impact shock waves in the distal forelimb of the horse. Equine Veterinary Journal Supplement 33: 11–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Gustås, P, Johnston, C, Roepstorff, L, Drevemo, S and Lanshammar, H (2004). Relationships between fore- and hindlimb ground reaction force and hoof deceleration patterns in trotting horses. Equine Veterinary Journal 36: 737–742.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Ratzlaff, MH, Wilson, PD, Hutton, DV and Slinker, BK (2005). Relationships between hoof-acceleration patterns of galloping horses and dynamic properties of the track. American Journal of Veterinary Research 66: 589–595.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Dyhre-Poulsen, P, Smedegard, HH, Roed, J and Korsgaard, E (1994). Equine hoof function investigated by pressure transducers inside the hoof and accelerometers mounted on the first phalanx. Equine Veterinary Journal 26: 362–366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Willemen, MA, Jacobs, MWH and Schamhardt, HC (1999). In vitro transmission and attenuation of impact vibrations in the distal forelimb. Equine Veterinary Journal Supplement 30: 245–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Lanovaz, JL, Clayton, HM and Watson, LG (1998). In vitro attenuation of impact shock in equine digits. Equine Veterinary Journal Supplement 26: 96–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Johnston, C, Roepstorff, L, Drevemo, S and Ronéus, N (1995). Kinematics of the distal forelimb during the stance phase in the fast trotting Standardbred. Equine Veterinary Journal Supplement 18: 170–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Johnston, C, Roepstorff, L, Drevemo, S and Kallings, P (1996). Kinematics of the distal hindlimb during stance phase in the fast trotting Standardbred. Equine Veterinary Journal 28: 263–268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Burn, JF, Wilson, A and Nason, GP (1997). Impact during equine locomotion: techniques for measurement and analysis. Equine Veterinary Journal Supplement 23: 9–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Schamhardt, HC and Merkens, HW (1994). Objective determination of ground contact of equine limbs at the walk and trot: comparison between ground reaction forces, accelerometer data and kinematics. Equine Veterinary Journal Supplement 17: 75–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Hennig, EM and Lafortune, MA (1991). Relationships between ground reaction force and tibial bone acceleration parameters. International Journal of Sport Biomechanics 7: 303–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20Leleu, C, Bariller, F, Cotrel, C and Barrey, E (2004). Reproducibility of a locomotor test for trotter horses. The Veterinary Journal 168: 160–166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21Back, W, Schamhardt, HC, Savelberg, HH, van den Bogert, AJ, Bruin, G, Hartman, W and Barneveld, A (1995a). How the horse moves: significance of graphical representations of equine forelimb kinematics. Equine Veterinary Journal 27: 31–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22Back, W, Schamhardt, HC, Savelberg, HHCM, van den Bogert, AJ, Bruin, G, Hartman, W and Barneveld, A (1995b). How the horse moves: 2. significance of graphical representations of equine hind limb kinematics. Equine Veterinary Journal 27: 39–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23Barr, ARS, Dow, SM and Goodship, AE (1995). Parameters of forelimb ground reaction force in 48 normal ponies. Veterinary Record 136: 283–286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24McLaughlin, RM, Gaughan, EM, Roush, JK and Skaggs, CL (1996). Effects of subject velocity on ground reaction force measurements and stance times in clinically normal horses at the walk and trot. American Journal of Veterinary Research 57: 7–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25Barrey, E, Landjerit, B and Wolter, R (1991). Shock and vibration during the hoof impact on different track surfaces. In: Persson, SG, Lindholm, A and Jeffcott, LB (eds), Equine Exercise Physiology 3 (pp. 97–106). Davis, CA: ICEEP Publications.Google Scholar
26Benoit, P, Barrey, E, Regnault, JC and Brochet, JL (1993). Comparison of the damping effect of different shoeing by the measurement of hoof acceleration. Acta Anatomica 146: 109–113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27Johnston, C, Hjertén, G and Drevemo, S (1991). Hoof landing velocities in trotting horses. In: Persson, SG, Lindholm, A and Jeffcott, LB (eds), Equine Exercise Physiology 3 (pp. 167–172). Davis, CA: ICEEP Publications.Google Scholar
28Riemersma, DJ, Schamhardt, HC, Hartman, W and Lammertink, JLMA (1987a). Kinetics and kinematics of the equine hind limb: in vivo tendon loads and force plate measurements in ponies. American Journal of Veterinary Research 49: 1344–1352.Google Scholar
29Riemersma, DJ, van den Bogert, AJ, Schamhardt, HC and Hartman, W (1987b). Kinetics and kinematics of the equine hind limb: in vivo tendon strain and joint kinematics. American Journal of Veterinary Research 49: 1353–1359.Google Scholar