Hostname: page-component-669899f699-cf6xr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-26T02:17:10.297Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

TABOO, HERMENEUTICAL INJUSTICE, AND EXPRESSIVELY FREE ENVIRONMENTS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2015

Charlie Crerar
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In Epistemic Injustice (2007), Miranda Fricker has insightfully introduced the notion of a hermeneutical injustice, where historic conditions of marginalisation serve to deprive individuals of the appropriate hermeneutical resources with which to render significant patches of their experience fully intelligible to themselves and others. In this paper I draw attention to a shortcoming in Fricker's account: that the only hermeneutical resource she acknowledges is a shared conceptual framework. Consequently, Fricker creates the impression that hermeneutical injustice manifests itself almost exclusively in the form of a conceptual lacuna. Considering the negative hermeneutical impact of certain societal taboos, however, suggests that there can be cases of hermeneutical injustice even when an agent's conceptual repertoire is perfectly adequate. I argue that this observation highlights the need to expand Fricker's account to accommodate a wider range of hermeneutical resources and, in turn, a broader taxonomy of hermeneutical injustice. Specifically, my central case of a societal taboo presses the need to recognize as a valuable hermeneutical resource an expressively free environment, in which individuals can put their conceptual-interpretative resources to good hermeneutical effect.

Type
Articles
Information
Episteme , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , June 2016 , pp. 195 - 207
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Allan, K. and Burridge, K. 2006. Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, E. 2012. ‘Epistemic Justice as a Virtue of Social Institutions.’ Social Epistemology, 26: 163–73.Google Scholar
Bobel, C. 2010. New Blood: Third Wave Feminism and the Politics of Menstruation. Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Britton, C. K. 1996. ‘Learning about “The Curse” – An anthropological Perspective on Experiences of Menstruation.’ Women's Studies International Forum, 19: 645–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, S. C. and Koch, P. B. 2007. ‘“Nobody told me nothing”: Communication about Menstruation among Low-income African American Women.’ Women & Health, 46: 57–78.Google Scholar
Fricker, M. 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fricker, M. 2013a. ‘Epistemic Justice as a Condition of Political Freedom?’ Synthese, 190: 1317–32.Google Scholar
Fricker, M. 2013b. ‘How is Hermeneutical Injustice Related To “White Ignorance”? Reply to José Medina's ‘Hermeneutical Injustice and Polyphonic Contextualism: Social Silences and Shared Hermeneutical Responsibilities.’ Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective, 2: 49–53.Google Scholar
Houppert, K. 1999. The Curse: Confronting the Last Unmentionable Taboo: Menstruation. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Houston, A. M., Abraham, A., Huang, Z., and D'Angelo, L. J. 2006. ‘Knowledge, Attitudes, and Consequences of Menstrual Health in Urban Adolescent Females.’ Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, 19: 271–5.Google Scholar
Kissling, E. 2002. ‘On the Rag on Screen: Menarche in Film and Television.’ Sex Roles, 46: 5–12.Google Scholar
Laadanlanguage.org 2009. Laádan to English dictionary. http://www.laadanlanguage.org/node/5.Google Scholar
Lee, J. and Sasser-Coen, J. 1996. ‘Memories of Menarche: Older Women Remember their First Period.’ Journal of Aging Studies, 10: 83–101.Google Scholar
McPherson, M. E. and Korfine, L. 2004. ‘Menstruation Across Time: Menarche, Menstrual Attitudes, Experiences, and Behaviours.’ Womens Health Issues, 14: 193–200.Google Scholar
Phipps, W. E. 1980. ‘The Menstrual Taboo in the Judeo-Christian Tradition.’ Journal of Religion and Health, 19: 298–303.Google Scholar
Roy, A. 2004. ‘The 2004 Sydney Peace Prize Lecture.’ Delivered at The Sydney Peace Prize: The University of Sydney. http://www.smh.com.au/news/Opinion/Roys-full-speech/2004/11/04/1099362264349.html.Google Scholar
Strange, J-M. 2001. ‘The assault on Ignorance: Teaching Menstrual Etiquette in English Schools.’ Social History of Medicine, 14: 247–65.Google Scholar