Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T22:10:47.835Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

ON TESTIMONY AND TRANSMISSION

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2014

Abstract

Jennifer Lackey's case “Creationist Teacher,” in which students acquire knowledge of evolutionary theory from a teacher who does not herself believe the theory, has been discussed widely as a counterexample to so-called transmission theories of testimonial knowledge and justification. The case purports to show that a speaker need not herself have knowledge or justification in order to enable listeners to acquire knowledge or justification from her assertion. The original case has been criticized on the ground that it does not really refute the transmission theory, because there is still somebody in a chain of testifiers – the person from whom the creationist teacher acquired what she testifies – who knows the truth of the testified statements. In this paper, we provide a kind of pattern for generating counterexample cases, one that avoids objections discussed by Peter Graham and others in relation to such cases.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adler, J. 2010. ‘Epistemological problems of testimony.’ In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. plato.stanford.eduGoogle Scholar
Audi, R. 1997. ‘The Place of Testimony in the Fabrication of Knowledge and Justification.’ American Philosophical Quarterly, 34: 405–22.Google Scholar
Audi, R.. 2006. ‘Testimony, Credulity and Veracity.’ In Lackey, J. and Sosa, E. (eds), The Epistemology of Testimony. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burge, T. 1993. ‘Content Preservation.’ Philosophical Review, 102: 457–88.Google Scholar
Burge, T.. 1998. ‘Computer Proof, a priori Knowledge, and other Minds.’ Noûs, 32 (S12): 137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burge, T.. 2013. Cognition through Understanding: Self-Knowledge, Locution, Reasoning, Reflection: Philosophical Essays, Volume 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dummett, M. 1994. ‘Testimony and Memory’. In B.K. and Matilal, A. Chakrabarti (eds), Knowing From Words, Vol. 230, pp. 251–72. Dordrecht: Kluwer (Springer Library).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faulkner, P. 2006. ‘Understanding Knowledge Transmission.’ Ratio, 19: 156–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faulkner, P.. 2011. Knowledge on Trust. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Graham, P. J. 2000. ‘Conveying Information.’ Synthese, 123: 365–92.Google Scholar
Graham, P. J.. 2006 a. ‘Can Testimony Generate Knowledge?Philosophica, 78: 105–27.Google Scholar
Graham, P. J.. 2006 b. ‘Testimonial Justification: Inferential or Non-Inferential?Philosophical Quarterly, 56: 8495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kletzl, S. 2011. ‘Somebody Has to Know: Jennifer Lackey on the Transmission of Epistemic Properties.’ In Jäger, C. and Löffler, W. (eds), Erkenntnistheorie: Kontexte, Werte, Dissens. Kirchberg am Wechsel: Niederösterreich Kultur.Google Scholar
Lackey, J. 2008. Learning from Words: Testimony as a Source of Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lackey, J.. 2011. ‘Assertion and Isolated Second-Hand Knowledge.’ In Brown, J. and Cappelen, H. (eds), Assertion: New Philosophical Essays, pp. 251–76. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McDowell, J. 1994. Knowledge By Hearsay. In B.K. and Matilal, A. Chakrabarti (eds), Knowing From Words, Vol. 230, pp. 195224. Dordrecht: Kluwer (Springer Library).Google Scholar
Moran, R. 2005. ‘Getting Told and Being Believed.’ Philosophers' Imprint, 5: 129.Google Scholar
Murray, M. J. and Rea, M. C. 2008. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, R. 2009. Law and Literature, Third Edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, T. 2000. Knowledge and its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar