Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T16:10:58.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Medieval Social Epistemology: Scientia for Mere Mortals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2012

Robert Pasnau
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Medieval epistemology begins as ideal theory: when is one ideally situated with regard to one's grasp of the way things are? Taking as their starting point Aristotle's Posterior Analytics, scholastic authors conceive of the goal of cognitive inquiry as the achievement of scientia, a systematic body of beliefs, grasped as certain, and grounded in demonstrative reasons that show the reason why things are so. Obviously, however, there is not much we know in this way. The very strictness of this ideal in fact gives rise to a body of literature on how Aristotle's framework might be relaxed in various ways, for certain specific purposes. In asking such questions, scholastic authors are in effect pursuing the project of social epistemology, by trying to adapt their ideal theory to the circumstances of everyday life.

Type
Research Article
Information
Episteme , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , February 2010 , pp. 23 - 41
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aristotle, . 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation. Barnes, J. (ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, Myles. 1981. “Aristotle on Understanding Knowledge.” In Berti, E. (ed.), Aristotle on Science: The “Posterior Analytics,” pp. 97–139. Padua: Editrice Antenore.Google Scholar
Chillingworth, William. 1638. The Religion of the Protestants a Safe Way to Salvation. Oxford: L. Lichfield.Google Scholar
Crombie, A. C. 1953. Robert Grosseteste and the Origins of Experimental Science, 1100–1700. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
De Pace, Anna. 1993. Le matematiche e il mondo: ricerche su un dibattito in Italia nella seconda metà del Cinquecento. Milan: FrancoAngeli.Google Scholar
Descartes, René. 1984. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R., and Murdoch, D. (tr.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grellard, Christophe. 2005. Croire et savoir: les principes de la connaissance selon Nicolas d'Autrécourt. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian. 2006. The Emergence of Probability: A Philosophical Study of Early Ideas about Probability, Induction and Statistical Inference. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
John, Buridan. 1513/1968. Quaestiones super decem libros Ethicorum Aristotelis ad Nicomachum. Repr. Frankfurt: Minerva.Google Scholar
John, Buridan. 1518/1964. In Metaphysicam Aristotelis quaestiones acutissimae. Repr. Frankfurt: Minerva.Google Scholar
John, Buridan. 2009. Summulae de dialectica. Klima, G. (tr.). New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Buridan, John. Quaestiones in primum librum Analyticorum Posteriorum. Hubien, H. (ed.). http://individual.utoronto.ca/pking/resources/buridan/QQ_in_Post_An.txtGoogle Scholar
John, Duns Scotus. 1950–. Opera omnia. Balić, C. et al. (eds.). Vatican City: Typis Polyglottis Vaticanis.Google Scholar
John, Duns Scotus. 1639/1968. Opera omnia. Wadding, L. (ed.). Repr. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
John, Duns Scotus. 2005. Die Prologe der Reportata Parisiensia des Johannes Duns Scotus: Untersuchugen zur Textüberlieferung und kritische Edition. Innsbruck: Institut für Christliche Philosophie.Google Scholar
John, Wyclif. 1893–9. Tractatus de logica. 3 vols. Dziewicki, M. H. (ed.). London: Trübner.Google Scholar
King, Peter. 1987. “Jean Buridan's Philosophy of Science.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 18: 109–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klima, Gyula. 2009. John Buridan. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maier, Anneliese. 1967. “Das Problem der Evidenz in der Philosophie des 14. Jahrhunderts.” In Ausgehendes Mittelalter: Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Geistesgeschichte des 14. Jahrhunderts, II: 367–418. Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura.Google Scholar
Murray, Michael J. 1995. “Leibniz on Divine Foreknowledge of Future Contingents and Human Freedom.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55: 75–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholas of Autrecourt. 1994. Correspondence with Master Giles and Bernard of Arezzo. Rijk, L. M. de (ed. and tr.). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Pasnau, Robert. 1995. “William Heytesbury on Knowledge: Epistemology Without Necessary and Sufficient Conditions.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 12: 347–66.Google Scholar
Pasnau, Robert. 2009. “Science and Certainty.” In Pasnau, R. (ed.), Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy, pp. 357–68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. 2003. The History of Scepticism from Savonarola to Bayle. Rev. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robert, Grosseteste. 1981. Commentarius in Posteriorum analyticorum libros. Rossi, P. (ed.). Florence: L. S. Olschki.Google Scholar
Silhon, Jean de. 1634. De l'immortalité de l'ame. Paris.Google Scholar
Stump, Eleonore. 1982. “Topics: Their Development and Absorption into Consequences.” In Kretzmann, N. et al. (eds.), Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy, pp. 273–99. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thijssen, Johannes M.M.H. 2000. “The Quest for Certain Knowledge in the Fourteenth Century: Nicholas of Autrecourt against the Academics.” In Sihvola, J. (ed.), Ancient Scepticism and the Sceptical Tradition, pp. 199–223. Helsinki: Societas Philosophica Fennica.Google Scholar
Waldman, Theodore. 1959. “Origins of the Legal Doctrine of Reasonable Doubt.” Journal of the History of Ideas 20: 299–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Thomas. 1665. An Exclusion of Scepticks from All Title to Dispute: Being an Answer to the Vanity of Dogmatizing. London: J. Williams.Google Scholar
William, Ockham. 1967–89. Expositio Physicorum. Richter, V. and Leibold, G. (eds.). In Opera philosophica, vol. IV. St. Bonaventure: Franciscan Institute Publications.Google Scholar
William, Ockham. 1989. Philosophical Writings. Rev. ed. Boehner, P. (tr.). Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, Henry. 1970. The Problem of Certainty in English Thought: 1630–1690. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zupko, Jack. 2001. “On Certitude.” In Thijssen, J. and Zupko, J. (eds.), The Metaphysics and Natural Philosophy of John Buridan, pp. 165–82. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar